Terry Anderson came to the same conclusion, and pointed this out on his show!!Quote:
Originally Posted by PinestrawGuys
Printable View
Terry Anderson came to the same conclusion, and pointed this out on his show!!Quote:
Originally Posted by PinestrawGuys
Then Terry Anderson is delusional. :roll:
I've listened to Terry once or twice and I recall he said something about he liked gun control so he's not the expert about the Constitution or our best interest as a Nation!
Well, I think it is fair to say that RP was a hard core OBL in the past. There is no denying that. I guess for some it is OK, because that was 1987. Well, for me that is not OK, because I clearly remember illegal immigration being a big problem in 1987 in California. And Paul's response to Russert was inadequate IMO. It goes back to the welfare state again....its not a problem unless they are receiving social services. End those, and we would be "generous in our immigration policy." I really don't think the libertarian views have been altered all that much. He did mention 9-11, but not that bone-headed views on immigration lead to these attacks. I really don't think we need to reinstitute the Bracero Program. Illegal immigration was huge during that period, because the regulations were uninforced -- and I don't see anywhere where Paul is going to be strict with employers. All I see is another failed guest worker program that brings with it the same flaws of Bracero, illegal immigration and wage depression.
What???? NO WAY!!! You are crazy, he never said this!!Quote:
Originally Posted by sturmruger
Yes a couple of weeks ago!Quote:
Originally Posted by Bren4824
Bear Flag,Quote:
Originally Posted by BearFlagRepublic
There we are with the 'E' word... ENFORCEMENT. If we'd had it since 1986 we wouldn't have this problem now.
That's the BIG reason I believe Ron Paul is the best candidate. Enforcement is the job of the Executive, and Ron Paul has ALWAYS done his job, regardless of his own PERSONAL feelings. I don't think he'll let his FEELINGS get in the way of doing his DUTY.
I listened to that show---and it was a joke. In NO way, shape, or form does he agree with gun control.Quote:
Originally Posted by sturmruger
I will see if he has transcripts from his show.
Forward the Dec. 16th show to about .55!Quote:
Originally Posted by Bren4824
http://thewakeupamerica.com/TERRY_AN...ES_PAGE_01.htm
Right after the commercial Terry says "there is a million things I would like to talk about..." ...he says he is an avid believer in gun control then says he believes in using two hands. Now the "two hands may have been a "joke" however not his stance about guns.
Around .65 Terry bashes FOX and Sean Hanity for not giving Tancredo and Hunter any time and did not mention Ron Paul!
About .8 an unbiased caller for Tancredo, Hunter, and Paul states some things about Paul and Terry said he would not give his opinion!
About .9 Greg from Reno called about Romney on the Glenn Beck show. Evidently when Romney was asked if he would pardon Ramos and Compean he said he would have to think about it.
About .95 Scott from Hartford called and suggested Paul should run with Tancredo.
You are right on the money with this post!!! They just keep spitting out the same vomit. :lol: :lol: I almost feel sorry for them. :wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by sturmruger
Other than Ron Paul there isn't anybody worth voting for. If anyone else gets elected we are going to have more of the same mess we have now. Every other candidate has changed his stand or just out right lied (Romney & Huckabee) saying anything that they think will help them get elected.
I am tired of voting for the lesser of 2 evils or voting against somebody this time I want to vote for somebody and Ron Paul is it.
You must have missed the first 20 seconds of every show then.Quote:
Originally Posted by sturmruger
Listen to first 20 seconds - of any show
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=estLGc0JU7Y
Bad_Hand wrote:
I totally disagree! Duncan Hunter is worth voting for. Furthermore, he has been extremely consistent during his 27 years in Congress. The man has never flipped, flopped, or lied on an issue that I'm aware of, and I consider myself fairly knowledgable on Hunter's history.Quote:
Other than Ron Paul there isn't anybody worth voting for. If anyone else gets elected we are going to have more of the same mess we have now. Every other candidate has changed his stand or just out right lied (Romney & Huckabee) saying anything that they think will help them get elected.
PineStrawGuys wrote:
Well, we certainly wouldn't have to worry about Hunter's feelings because there is no doubt as to where he stands on all issues regarding illegal immigration and border security. :wink:Quote:
That's the BIG reason I believe Ron Paul is the best candidate. Enforcement is the job of the Executive, and Ron Paul has ALWAYS done his job, regardless of his own PERSONAL feelings. I don't think he'll let his FEELINGS get in the way of doing his DUTY.
Terry gave his opinion of RP in his 12/23/2007 show at about 30min markQuote:
Originally Posted by sturmruger
and callers followed including CCIR
http://thewakeupamerica.com/TERRY_ANDER ... AGE_01.htm
Link the Dec 16th and around 35 minutes he says he is an avid supporter of gun control and believes we should use two hands. Maybe he ment to say something different and misspoke or he interprets the 2nd Amendment differently.Quote:
Originally Posted by Once_A_Democrat
http://thewakeupamerica.com/TERRY_AN...ES_PAGE_01.htm
Geez oh man----You are just "reaching" for anything. It was a JOKE about the gun control----I listened to the show.Quote:
Originally Posted by sturmruger
AGAIN----IT WAS A JOKE!!!! I heard the show!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by sturmruger
Ron Paul has NO plans/intentions of going after employers. He is not the "best" candidate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad_Hand
Romney has NOT outright lied about anything.
No, not really. I just find it unbelievable that Paul has no plan for going after employers---NONE----or holding employers accountable in any way----which is why THOUSANDS of illegals have left Arizona and Oklahoma----but this FACT is totally ignored by the Paul supporters.Quote:
Originally Posted by Balboa
A joke in which he states he is for gun control about three times before (i guess) the punch line that he would rather use two hands. Misspoke? He did say the second amendment protects the first after correcting himself by originally stating the reversed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bren4824
OBVIOUSLY, you do not listen to Terry Anderson on a regular basis----many people do.Quote:
Originally Posted by sturmruger
Those who do, will automatically know that Terry was joking.
What he said about using two hands is the punchline to the joke about gun control.
Control the gun with 2 hands when you shoot it - your kidding on not getting it.Quote:
Originally Posted by sturmruger
[quote=Once_A_Democrat]Control the gun with 2 hands when you shoot it - your kidding on not getting it.[/quote:2sjyk0k1]He didn't use those exact words but after hearing the first twenty seconds of each show that is what he was talking about. lolQuote:
Originally Posted by sturmruger
My apologies for criticizing Terry about gun control, he is supports the second amendment.
[quote=sturmruger]He didn't use those exact words but after hearing the first twenty seconds of each show that is what he was talking about. lolQuote:
Originally Posted by Once_A_Democrat
My apologies for criticizing Terry about gun control, he is supports the second amendment.[/quote:3oaheuy4]
No problem.
You should listen to his show live----he is on every Sunday night at 12AM EST.
I know that is late, I usually try to make it. However, I will go back and listen to the archives if I cannot stay up.
Ya, he only ran Libertarian one time. Some live in the past. How do you win anything in the present when the past is all that matters?Quote:
Originally Posted by kniggit
It's nice to know we are all on the same side fighting to take American back. :lol:
How about those New England Patriots winning 16 - 0. Awesome team/winners.
Maybe we could be a team and win like they do All The Time as a team...instead of arguing constantly on every issue. 8O
Go Patriots.
Yet what they have actually done in the past is usually all we
have to judge them on , If that wasn't the case then we would fall
for the BS that Huck , Rudi and McCain are spewing also
We look at their past , why not look at Pauls past?
Again your so scared of Ron Paul that you have to bring up his Libertarian Party past in which he ran against Reagan who had a CFR Vice and over 300 CFR people on his staff as a result granted amnesty, all in a thread titled "Mitt Romney on Immigration". You think Ron Paul should have ran as a Democrat against Reagan, Paul has stated he was in "trouble" with the Libertarian Party for his strict stance with illegals. The other issues your referring about is in regards to legal immigration so I guess as long as your CFR candidate Romney is OK with high IQ foriegners taking our professional jobs then that is OK.Quote:
Originally Posted by usanevada
Actually sturmruger, Ron Paul ran against George H.W. Bush in 1988, not Reagan.
Have you seen W's post in the Announcements area yet?
He's asking that we call a truce until after the Iowa caucuses.
Let's try and make that happen, OK? :wink:
Truce on this issue until after Iowa
I stand corrected Ron Paul ran against the CFR candidate GH Bush in 1988 (worse than Reagan), so we're calling a truce until after Iowa.Quote:
Originally Posted by PinestrawGuys
YesQuote:
Originally Posted by sturmruger
William ask in announcements that we call a truce until after Iowa and thats fine with me , I think Pine agrees also
Besides , we should be bashing Huck anyway, he is the real problem for now
Earlier today I watched Sheriff Arpaio's interview on Fox, where he was adamant that Romney believes in enforcement by attrition and that companies should be heavily fined. I will support Romney if Hunter is more then 10 pts behind the other leading candidates. I have a difficult time believing Tancredo, Simcox or Arpaio would sell America out and I would love to see them in the next administration.(my hopes)