Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443

    Obama’s Military Equipment Cuts to Police Will Hurt Border Agencies

    by Sylvia Longmire
    20 May 2015

    On May 18, Administration officials announced President Obama will ban the federal provision of some types of military-style equipment to local police departments, and sharply restrict the availability of others. According to the New York Times, the ban is part of his push to ease tensions between law enforcement and minority communities after the crises in Baltimore, Ferguson, and other cities. Unfortunately, his across-the-board peace-making slash isn’t taking account of the cartel war faced by local police departments on the southwest border every day.

    The buzzword of choice these days for open-borders advocates and anti-police activists is militarization – of our southwest border, larger cities, and small communities. This is understandable, as the equipment being used by some police departments clearly falls under the category of military-grade: armored personnel carriers, ballistic vests, high-powered rifles, and night vision goggles. The sight of a large group of police officers in full riot gear getting ready to face off with an angry mob can be pretty intimidating.

    However, the problem is that Obama is placing the blame for the mistrust between police and minority communities on the intimidation factor of the equipment and vehicles, rather than the human relationships – or lack thereof – between the officers and community residents. As a result of this knee-jerk reaction and idealistic crusade, which he believes will actually placate angry minorities, many police officers will go unprotected from aggressors better armed and protected than they are. Nowhere is this disparity more evident than along the US-Mexico border.

    The worst gang neighborhoods in Los Angeles, Chicago, and Detroit are veritable war zones at times. But gang members are known to police, their tactics familiar, and whereabouts usually local. In places like Brownsville, TX, or Nogales, AZ, local police officers and sheriffs’ deputies are the first line of defense against armed and deadly drug smugglers – most of whom work directly for brutally violent Mexican cartels – who manage to sneak past Border Patrol agents. Most smaller border communities are poor, and their law enforcement agencies rely heavily on federal grants, such as Operation Stonegarden funds, to help pay for much-needed equipment and officer overtime related to the border security mission. Without federal help to buy the protective gear and firearms needed to effectively confront these no-holds-barred criminal thugs, these officers are essentially bringing knives to a gunfight.

    What President Obama fails to understand is that these officers are facing a foreign enemy with unlimited funding, as well-armed and equipped as any conventional army or special operations unit. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was murdered by a Mexican rip crew in southern Arizona in December 2010, despite his entire BORTAC team having military-style weapons and ballistic gear. What would have become of local sheriffs’ deputies under Obama’s equipment ban if these border bandits had not been apprehended or driven back into Mexico, but instead continued to head north?

    It is short-sighted and naïve to presume that softening the look of police officers in crowd-control scenarios will automatically calm down an angry mob, or soften the attitude of a bitter community towards its police department. It’s also irresponsible to implement a general cut on crucial equipment designed to protect officers in the most dangerous situations, without taking into account the unique needs of agencies in certain regions of the country.

    Once again, Obama tries to be the “nice guy” – except this time at home with minority communities, instead of foreign tyrant dictators. In the meantime, he fails to address the very real and disturbing concerns of these cities and towns, endangering the men and women committed to protecting them.

    http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015/...rder-agencies/
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member vistalad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    NorCal
    Posts
    3,036
    This article conflates two different problems.

    On the one hand we have situations in communities such as Ferguson. There black Americans see the local police as symbols of oppression. Fortunately the level of armament that these folks can bring to bear does not pose a large-scale threat to the local police force or to any force brought in from a larger jurisdiction.

    On the other hand we have the situation in border communities and states. There cartel smugglers pose a threat to the locals, including local police forces and border patrol agents. We should make allowances for law enforcement's need to be on at least equal ground with dangerous criminals.

    And finally, we should face up to the reality of both these problems. Black Americans often feel that they have been pushed aside - which in fact they have. Law abiding people in border jurisdictions believe that their safety is being ignored - which in fact it is.

    Illegal aliens play a role in both these situations. Illegals undercut Americans for entry level jobs and they are sometimes part of the smuggling operations.

    Political choice also plays a role in both situations. 'Bama has abandoned the poorest Americans, to get the future votes of his precious Undocumented Democrats. (The Repub leadership huffs and puffs about this, but in truth they're using 'Bama as cover for giving their big money donors the additonal surplus labor which will keep payrolls low and profits high.) By flying in illegals from Central America, he signals the world that the door to the United States in wide open. Policies such as this make it extremely difficult to police our southern border.

    And finally, demand creates supply. We're going to have to admit that we should be treating all drugs the same way that we now treat alcohol: legalization, regulation, taxation, and education. Anything else is a delusion.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-21-2015, 12:38 PM
  2. BUSTED! Obama Regime Caught Giving Russia Free High Level Military Equipment, Even Af
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-30-2014, 05:32 AM
  3. Barack Obama To Leave, Destroy $36B In Military Equipment In Afghanistan
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-14-2013, 10:42 PM
  4. Border Could Receive Unused Military Equipment
    By JohnDoe2 in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-20-2011, 01:54 AM
  5. Cardiologists Crying Foul Over Medicare Cuts Hurt Obama
    By cjbl2929 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-28-2009, 04:56 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •