Thread: What If We All Went on Welfare......

For the purpose of creating as big a family size as the typical Hispanic seperatist does? I'm saying this because many patriots cannot afford a larger family size working a regular job...while many of those wishing to overthrow us are receiving welfare and breeding like rabbits. Of course, those who have great jobs and don't need to do this shouldn't resort to this. I know it would be a strain on us....but what if we too, cried "poormouth" and got on public welfare so we too could all have large families? The benefit would be that we have more patriots to help fight against the ferals. It's just a thought, but would it work? At least we'd get some of the money back that we give in taxes....or would it sink the economy that much faster? Just wondering, what does everybody here think? (BTW I'm not married and old-fashioned...I have no prospects of having a family at all right now....) Good idea? Bad idea? What does everyone think?

I am tooooooooo ancient to have a larger family, why don't we just end payments to anybody who can not PROVE they are looking for work or who turn down any job. My city is paying dearly to cut grass for abandond homes, why don't we just make the welfare recipiants show up to do this kind of manuel labor?

Sacredrage, I certainly grasp the sentiment of your post, I've heard it angrily threatened by many. First in fighting the ferals, we have the greatest military in the world but our government does not see this as a hot war or, unfortunately, a cold one, based upon their inaction.

Welfare costs someone money, usually taxpayers or benevelent organizations. If we got into competitive breeding and a war did not come to control population growth, in a few years even more jobs would be required to employ these people created from spite.

I tend to personally believe that over population of the world now has a minor part in all this. Children in Africa starve to death daily. Provided that there is enough food and/or wealth to provide for these folks, I do not believe the compassionate organizations of the world would allow that.

New world leadership, including in U.S., needs to be someone that can think forward adequately to solve, or at least offer sensible solutions to major problems existing worldwide. I do not see that in any American leaders today. (Where the hell is HST when he is sorely neededd.)


All that said, I will say that welfare begins at home and we do have to do a better job of taking care of ours to beccome strong enough or wealthy enough to care for others.


I will be glad to see responses, listen to opinions, accept criticism, exchange ideas.

Liberals want all of us on welfare...Government checks are government control over everyone..Not just the recipient of my tax monies...
Next they want your gun for food stamps?
Or give you a hundred bucks to spy on me! Can you be bought too?

This country's back is broke, welfare and unemployment benefits are running on fumes.
And millions will be losing their unemployment benefits soon and jumping on the "Gravy Train"

"Communism" does not work it is a proven fact, and the whole "Gimme' Generation" will fail.

'A government big enough to give you anything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.' - Thomas Jefferson

Originally Posted by kevinssdad

I will be glad to see responses, listen to opinions, accept criticism, exchange ideas.

My plan is simple as far as the welfare issue is concerned. Instead of welfare checks and food stamps, those in need can pick up "care packages" of filling, nutritious, but not exciting or particularly tasty food. The only choices or exception will be based on medically proven allergies. Housing will be provided, but those in need of the housing will be limited in items they can own as well as income limits. One small tv, no computers, car must have a max value of 2k, one car per family. Anything of value must be sold prior to qualifying for housing assistance. Failure to comply would include mandatory jail time plus reimbursement of entire amount of government aid given. Any able bodied member of the family on aid, who is not employed, over the age of 16 must do community service work such as maintaining parks, mowing the lawns of abandoned houses ect. Illegals applying for aid for their anchor babies will be given transportation to their country of citizenship. They will be given the option of taking the anchor babies with them or extingueshing parental rights so the children can stay and be adopted.

Also, anybody who is currently on government aid would have their voting privileges suspended until the time they are no longer receiving aid.

There is very little, if anything, suggested to date on this thread that I would take major issue with if enacted today.

That acknowledged personally I believe that we have had to much action and reaction in America for two generatins without thinking. That thinking should include how does this bill if it become law affect our country tomorrow, next year, next decade, next generation,


I've had enough of "gore anyone's ox except mine." I've had enough of what do I have to promise to get elected, I'll flip-flop next time if necessary to get re-elected. The House of Representatives was never intended, by Constitution, to be a Chamber of professional politicians. We need leaders that are willing to sacrifice personal glory for the betterment of the country.


Does anyone else see or desire same?

OK, OK, bad idea. I was just thinking if I have to pay for my enemies to have children why not pay for my side...but yeah, you're right about the job need, resources being strained, etc. And I really don't wish to live in a country jam-packed tight with people like sardines, even when we wind up winning this war in the end and the only Hispanics remaining in the U.S. are those who are real Americans.

Don't worry airdale, nobody is going to "buy off" THIS American to sell you or any other patriot out!! You're talking to someone who has a conscience and believes we'll all have to account for how we lived at the end of our lives....unlike the majority of our politicians.

Originally Posted by sacredrage

OK, OK, bad idea. I was just thinking if I have to pay for my enemies to have children why not pay for my side...but yeah, you're right about the job need, resources being strained, etc. And I really don't wish to live in a country jam-packed tight with people like sardines, even when we wind up winning this war in the end and the only Hispanics remaining in the U.S. are those who are real Americans.

Don't worry airdale, nobody is going to "buy off" THIS American to sell you or any other patriot out!! You're talking to someone who has a conscience and believes we'll all have to account for how we lived at the end of our lives....unlike the majority of our politicians.

sacredrage and all other participants of this thread: I hope that this thread does not end quickly with just this much discusssion. One idea that is not well thought through or hastily offered can lead to solutions. Probably none of us individulallyhave the answers, but reasonalble minds working openly with others sometimes creates good ideas out of not so great ones, Frankly, I was elated to see this thread started, and sacredrage, thank you.