PJTV Exclusive: Does Ann Coulter Still Support Donald Trump for President?

PJTV Exclusive: Does Ann Coulter Still Support Donald Trump for President?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWH9wcQI6d8

https://yt3.ggpht.com/-B3AghGMMyaA/A...ffff/photo.jpg
PJ Media

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWH9wcQI6d8

Ann Coulter says in this video that she supports Donald Trump more than ever before now. But, smart way to phrase the title to attract viewers with that question :)

W

Trump needs to win in Wisconsin. Without that his nomination may become an impossibility. But here is a a guy who is a doer, who actually takes resolute action, who thinks outside the box. I know that on the issue of immigration Cruz will be better than most others. What I see happening is a protracted civil conflict---even under the most stringent border policies. Basically our society now has a permanent progressive cast to it, because the influence of religion has declined and enthusiastic young people are more inclined to be shaped by the currents of academic thought and prodded into corresponding political action, than religious thought and duties. And today the unspoken motto in nearly all human affairs is "WINNING IS EVERYTHING."

I am thinking of writing an original article for ALIPAC---because I don't see any conservative commentators taking this up. And living in one of the most left wing states in the country this is clearly happening and is a new power tactic: Ethics Complaints!

No, these are not your grandparents or parents ethics complaints or anything we have actually known until now. What they are are ethics complaints against conservative politicians based upon brand new standards as our laws are changed by federal court decisions and as governmental ethics commissions lose their traditional bearings. In our state a county judge has been forced out because he declined to marry gays. The tool: A state ethics complaint.
Now they are trying to use that same tactic against a county prosecutor who, on a Facebook page on his own time, remarked how different races tend to commit different crimes (and he included whites in his remark) therefore, profiling was still very necessary. This has resulted in two state Commissions filing ethics complaints.

And in my own County a competent Sheriff has come under court sanctions (i.e. financial settlements) for some tough skinned verbal exchanges with a subordinate. This has also resulted in the County Chair asking the State attorney general to do a criminal investigation. They have targeted this Sheriff, because they really want enforcement according to new diversity standards that let crimes "of color" go unchallenged." They even have a Committee looking into how to replace this elected position with an appointed one.

This is very serious. It means that progressive groups, can remove elected officials, as long as they are able to convince a likely sympathetic State Ethics Commission that said official does not meet the NEW standards. It is no longer based upon the CONVENTIONAL ethics standards that we have known for decades. It may be based upon politically charged court decisions.

Ethics has become as vague as beauty because it sits in the minds of the beholders. What is unethical to one is patriotic to another. Given the state of our nation, we need to do away with "ethics" in government and just follow criminal and civil law. If private organizations want to have "ethics" committees to hound their members and hold them to a certain level of conduct, that's fine, it's a voluntary submission to the Grand Poo-Bah.

But in government? A politically charged organization with no common ground or mutual respect? It's a fallacy, a tool to remove without cause under the false flag of "ethics".

Quote:

I am thinking of writing an original article for ALIPAC---because I don't see any conservative commentators taking this up. And living in one of the most left wing states in the country this is clearly happening and is a new power tactic: Ethics Complaints!

I hope that you do.