Thread: Powerful Democrats Demand New Constitution, Continuing Obama's Tyranny Beyond 2 Terms

Mad World News

Powerful Democrats Demand New Constitution, Continuing Obama's Tyranny Beyond Two Terms!
http://madworldnews.com/constitution-obama-tyranny/
With the direction the country is going, do you see it happening?




Powerful Democrats Demand New Constitution, Continuing Obama's Tyranny Beyond Two Terms!
If you ask most of the readers here what is the best part of President Barack Obama's second term, most of them will say there is no best part. However, I
madworldnews.com

Powerful Democrats Demand New Constitution, Continuing Obama’s Tyranny Beyond Two Terms!

in News, Opinion, Politics / by Jan Omega / on October 4, 2014 at 3:28 pm /

If you ask most of the readers here what is the best part of President Barack Obama’s second term, most of them will say there is no best part. However, I beg to differ because the best part is that it will eventually end. What is even better, because this is his second term, we don’t have to worry about dealing with him for another four years! That is surely good news, especially with what we here at Mad World News have reported on our current president, such as Obama praising a Muslim cleric who supports the massacre of American soldiers. This may be expected from someone who reportedly admitted to shredding up the Constitution to support his agenda right?
However, there are reports that powerful liberals and Democrats are forcing a brand new constitution to be written up. The reason is simple: to keep Barack Obama in office past the maximum of two terms.



By overturning the amendment that limits presidents to two terms, Democrats will be able to achieve their goal of a Democratic Monarch (tyrant)!

According to an article by American News, recent reports say liberal Democrat Donna Brazile has called for a new constitution to be created to “save America” from “charlatans, loudmouths, and the one percent.” It should be obvious that those terms are pointed with derogatory intent towards Conservatives. The thing about our Constitution is that it was written with intents and purposes beyond what most people think. For example, the 2nd Amendment gives us the right to bear arms. It wasn’t added for hunting, but defense from a militant tyrannical government.

Donna Brazile ✔ @donnabrazile Follow We need a new constitution: Here’s how we save American democracy from charlatans, loudmouths and the 1 percent http://zite.to/1CvqRpU
10:22 PM - 27 Sep 2014

The reason for Thomas Dewey supporting an amendment limiting presidential terms is because it was seen as a bulwark against monarchy, which is a form of rule our forefathers wanted to escape. Even Thomas Jefferson railed against the prospect of third terms and more, associating them to life-long presidents.

“If some termination to the services of the chief Magistrate be not fixed by the Constitution, or supplied by practice, his office, nominally four years, will in fact become for life.”

Nevertheless, Democrats have long-desired for a third term for President Barack Obama as reported by Infowars. It reports that Democrats every couple of years throw out the prospect of overturning the amendment limiting presidents to two terms. Apparently, they want President Barack Obama to be King Barry II where he would have the necessary time to fully carry out what has been called his neo-socialist plan.
Now that you’ve read this travesty of Democrats wanting to write up a new Constitution for their own agenda (being Barack Obama), we want to know what you think. With the direction the country is going, do you see it happening? Will the Democrats achieve their goal or will Conservatives succeed in stopping this crime-in-the-making? Please let us know in the comments below.

[Images via Bing]

Like the aggressive reporting of Jan Omega?
Follow him at Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, and Pinterest


http://madworldnews.com/constitution-obama-tyranny/

Here's an excerpt from Chapter 2 of Saul Alinsky's book, Rules for Radicals:

"The means-and-ends moralists, constantly obsessed with the ethics of the means used by the Have-Nots against the Haves, should search themselves as to their real political position. In fact, they are passive -- but real -- allies of the Haves...The most unethical of all means is the non-use of any means... The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be."

Here again are the rules they play by:

"Tactics are those conscious deliberate acts by which human beings live with each other and deal with the world around them. ... Here our concern is with the tactic of taking; how the Have-Nots can take power away from the Haves." p.126

Always remember the first rule of power tactics (pps.127-134):

1. "Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have."

2. "Never go outside the expertise of your people. When an action or tactic is outside the experience of the people, the result is confusion, fear and retreat.... [and] the collapse of communication.

3. "Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy. Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

4. "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity."

5. "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counteract ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage."

6. "A good tactic is one your people enjoy."

7. "A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Man can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time...."

8. "Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose."

9. "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself."

10. "The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign."

11. "If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside... every positive has its negative."

12. "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative."

13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. In conflict tactics there are certain rules that [should be regarded] as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and 'frozen.'... "...any target can always say, 'Why do you center on me when there are others to blame as well?' When your 'freeze the target,' you disregard these [rational but distracting] arguments.... Then, as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all the 'others' come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target...' "One acts decisively only in the conviction that all the angels are on one side and all the devils on the other." (pps.127-134)

Uploaded on Dec 6, 2011
Hillary Rodham's thesis from 1969 Wellesley College, on Rules for Radicals. She met with Saul Alinsky, interviewed him and was even offered a job by Alinsky.
The Occupy Wall Street movement is backed and funded by these guys. They all go back to Daddy WarBucks - George, I want to destroy America, Soros - Hillary, Francis Piven, Richard Cloward, William Ayers, Cass Sunstein, Bernadine Dohrn and the younger Barry Soetoro and Van Jones.

here's the original blog
http://thedailytrumpet.blogspot.com/2...

Hillary's thesis
http://nukegingrich.files.wordpress.c...

the American Thinker blog
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/1...

Hillary, Obama and the Cult of Alinsky
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-n...

my website blog
http://thedailytrumpet.blogspot.com/

ne·o-Marx·ist

ˌnēōˈmärksəst/
adjective
adjective: neo-Marxist

• 
  of or relating to forms of political philosophy that arise from the adaptation of Marxist thought to accommodate or confront modern issues such as the global economy, the capitalist welfare state, and the stability of liberal democracies.

noun
noun: neo-Marxist; plural noun: neo-Marxists

• a person with neo-Marxist views.

NEW WORLD ORDER DECLARED (2014 ALERT)- OBAMA'S NEW AMERICA