Results 1 to 5 of 5
Like Tree7Likes

Thread: Cruz: Why Yes, Denying Trump the Nomination at a Contested Convention Would be Legiti

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012

    Cruz: Why Yes, Denying Trump the Nomination at a Contested Convention Would be Legiti

    Cruz: Why Yes, Denying Trump the Nomination at a Contested Convention Would be Legitimate

    Guy Benson |
    Mar 16, 2016






    First, a few thoughts on last night's results, followed by a look at Cruz's remarks. Super Tuesday 3.0's big winner was Hillary Clinton. She dominated the delegate count, swept the night, and used her (grating, shouty) victory speech to focus her attention on Republican frontrunner Donald Trump -- the one Republican who's most likely to help solve some of her problems on the Left and among the so-called Obama coalition. She also witnessed the exit of Marco Rubio, who boasted some of the strongest general election fundamentals and head-to-head numbers of anyone in the race. His potential threat has been neutralized, much to the delight of liberals. John Kasich closed strong and carried his home state of Ohio comfortably, denying Trump 66 delegates -- but he literally has no path to the nomination, outside of a contested convention from which he'd be exceedingly unlikely to emerge as the GOP standard bearer. There's an argument that his continued presence in the race might help siphon off Trump votes in certain areas and states moving forward, but it's more likely that he's maxed out his 'Stop Trump' utility at this point. Nevertheless, he vowed to fight on to Cleveland, and is making moves to that effect.

    Which brings us to Ted Cruz. The Texas Senator came in third in last night's delegate race, but is the only Republican standing with a serious chance of stopping Trump. He welcomed Rubio supporters into the fold, offering kind words for his colleague from Florida. He's hoping to unite the anti-Trump movement and fight tooth and nail for delegates throughout the spring, culminating in a contested convention in July. More on that in a moment. Given Trump's very Super Tuesday, in which he appears to have won five of six nominating contests (Missouri is extremely tight and may go to a recount) and bagged the most delegates by far, Cruz's pre-Cleveland path to victory has all but evaporated. In fact, Trump's delegate haul in Illinois and Missouri overcame his Ohio loss. He is a stronger frontrunner today than he was yesterday. But he's still not invincible. Why? Despite bragging about polling at 50 percent nationally in his victory speech, his polling average is nowhere near that mark at the moment. And then there's the polarization factor, which has given rise to entrenched opposition within a deeply dissatisfied center-right electorate:


    Even if these contingents are sliced in half as the cycle progresses, those data points are still really problematic numbers for a candidate with so many serious structural vulnerabilities. Ted Cruz will now prosecute a two-pronged case against Trump: That he's unelectable in the fall, and that he's unworthy of both the conservative and populist mantles to which he's laying claim. Now, having dismissed and critiqued the concept of a contested convention for weeks, Cruz's campaign and allies should take note of the argument their candidate advanced with Hugh Hewitt last evening prior to returns coming in. There's a difference between an establishment-"brokered" convention and acontested convention, he said, contending that a scenario under which the delegate frontrunner doesn't end up claiming the final crown wouldn't necessarily be illegitimate:


    For what it's worth, he also said he has "zero interest" in running as Trump's running mate, stating that the billionaire will lose to Hillary Clinton. John Kasich has also said there's "no way" he'll end up on Trump's ticket. As you contemplate the possibility of fireworks in Cleveland, keep in mind what the rules are, what the behind-the-scenes maneuvering might entail, and how a multi-ballot convention would work. As anti-Trump forces simultaneously gird for a convention battle and huddle over a potential independent bid, Ramesh Ponnuru devises a plan under which a contested convention would be as open and fair as possible. Interesting:
    Republicans could change the rules of their convention to permit some kind of preferential ballot. The rule change would have to be proposed in advance, so that members of the convention’s rules committee have time to consider it before voting on it during the week before all the delegates arrive in Cleveland. Then, if it passes the committee, a majority of delegates would have to vote for it too. When it came time for the delegates to vote on the presidential nomination, delegates would rank their candidates — with pledged delegates putting the candidates to whom they are pledged at the top of their lists. It would probably also be necessary—to reduce the likelihood of accusations of dirty tricks — for each delegate to make his or her rank orderings public immediately after the vote.

    It’s a process that would generate a majority for a candidate automatically: There would no need for multiple ballots, and thus no politicking between rounds of voting. The process would also be formally neutral. My guess is that most of the delegates who are not pledged to either Trump or Cruz will prefer the senator to the billionaire, and so the process will work to Cruz’s advantage. But it is certainly possible that Trump would win the instant runoff — and even possible, if less likely, that a third candidate could.Whoever lost the nomination contest would have no legitimate complaint with this process, which would be entirely above-board. Supporters of the losing candidate would, of course, still be able to withhold their votes from the nominee in the fall, by voting for a third-party candidate, or voting for the Democratic nominee, or just staying home. But they would have no grounds for arguing that the nomination had been stolen.
    I'll leave you with two divergent takes on the road ahead, based on last night's outcomes:

    Bottom line: Hard to see how Trump DOESN'T get to 1,237 from here. Beating Cruz in red states, likely to beat Kasich in blue states.

    .@jaketapper: "We're probably going to be covering a contested Republican convention"


    http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybens...imate-n2134448

  2. #2
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    67,681
    bttt
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,150
    If contesting or brokering the results of the primary elections is legitimate within the Republican Party, then why do they participate in the primary elections at all? And why did they convince Trump to give up an independent run for a run at the primary elections? These people are totally corrupt.

    There has to be a trail of quotes going all the way back to Trump's agreement to run as a Republican in the primary election that exposes these crooks.
    Support ALIPAC'sFIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  4. #4
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    The solution is for Trump to win in the primary elections and collect enough committed delegates to win on the first ballot with 1237 delegates or more. Trump Supporters just have to work hard to help him win on the first ballot, then they can't do anything to take it away from him.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  5. #5
    Administrator ALIPAC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Gheen, Minnesota, United States
    Posts
    67,681
    Ted Cruz and John Kasich's efforts to defy the votes and will of the public to elect themselves over the clear primary winner, Donald Trump, are disgusting and must be stopped.

    W
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Similar Threads

  1. Seeing Trump as vulnerable, GOP elites now eye a contested convention
    By ALIPAC in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-09-2016, 08:20 PM
  2. First on CNN: Rubio prepares for contested convention
    By ALIPAC in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-03-2016, 09:47 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-25-2016, 02:28 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-31-2016, 03:44 PM
  5. 76% of GOP now 'conservative,' pick Cruz for 2016 nomination
    By Reciprocity in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-28-2013, 07:01 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •