If it fools any of the other 98 senators, then it will be proof of dementia in the Senate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kate
Printable View
If it fools any of the other 98 senators, then it will be proof of dementia in the Senate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kate
All it is doing for me is pissing me off and making me more determined to STOP THIS TRAVESTY!!!! LETS ROAR and LET Them know we are AS MAD AS HELL AND WE are not going to take it anymore. PHONE, FAX and EMAIL!!! Our country is depending on us!Quote:
Originally Posted by Kate
Phone numbers at:
http://www.alipac.us/modules.php?name=F ... ic&t=68216
What makes me so mad is just a few weeks ago, Feinstein was in a committee hearing where there was testimony about the violent crimes caused by the illegals in this country, yet she can stand there and stick up for these criminals.
Thank God she's done. Now it's hutchinson's turn. Hutchinson wants a touchback provision which will get voted down, you can bet.
Criminals always stand up for other Criminals...till the crap hits the fan than...well you know :wink:Quote:
yet she can stand there and stick up for these criminals.
Hutchinson keeps saying there are good parts in the bill.
No Kay, there isn't. KILL BILL!!
This is the first poison pill amendment. If it passes the bill is on shaky ground.Quote:
Originally Posted by tinybobidaho
Hutchinson keeps saying her amendment takes the amnesty out of the bill. It does not. They still get to stay here immediately under temporary probationary status.
Just the fact they can stay here at all is amnesty. I don't care how she wants spin it.
The good thing is that Feinstien and Kennedy are VERY against any ammendments that alters this bill. THis is going to cause touble between members....which could led to further disruption, which is GOOD!Quote:
Originally Posted by tinybobidaho
DeMint is up.
Says the bill keeps changing, hard to tell what's in the bill.
Now there's a new bill that has significant flaws in it.
He says there's an amendment is being rewritten right now and this bill is like a moving target.
DeMint is requesting the amendment be read, Feinstein is objecting.
Asking the amendment be set aside until it can be read and Feinstein is objecting.
Feinstein is objecting because she doesn't want anyone to know what is really in the bill.