Printable View
SHARIA LAW Has Completely Taken Over Dearborn, Michigan
Muslims Have Taken Over Dearborn Michigan Completely! On Welfare too! No American flags either.
Published on Apr 4, 2017
The News Guru: Dearborn: Muslim at city council meeting calls for Sharia patrols, restriction on free speech. Residents say that Dearborn Michigan Doesn't look like America anymore, but looks more like Saudi or Iran. MUST SEE!!
https://youtu.be/RMBESTJPdo4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...&v=RMBESTJPdo4
It's disgusting.
Why is there no mention of this by our MSM, such as the New York Times, MSNBC, ABC, The Washington Post, The New York Daily News, etc.?
JWK
This is NOT assimilation to America which is a requirement for a foreigner to be allowed here to live.
This muslim thing has been going on for many years now - gw imported as many as obama and obama brazenly added all the secretive allowances. Forced political correctness down our throats as he broke our laws. By controlling the media, the realities of our cities today are not exposed.
Between the multitude of illegals and imported muslims, our cities/states have changed tremendously. As we pay for them all, we get less and less quality of life. You have lawyer groups that state migrants have rights to live illegally here in the USA.
This is all a big con on our citizens - similar to EU's sins/crimes. They actually EVICT their citizens to house migrants that are committing gross social acts - masturbating as they sit next to a woman on a train, defecating while they wait for the train, cats/dogs found dead & actually banned in some major EU cities and charges dropped of child molestation because it is "culturally acceptable" in their home country. None of these people should be allowed in western civilization. They are highly inbred and nuts. See the power of the globalists?
hillary was on board with it - she, kaine did not wear an American flag pin - UNREAL! She said "we will shame Americans if they get upset by the muslim thing" not quoting exactly.
Satirical website makes up ‘article’ on sharia law for humor; City of Dearborn not amused by falsehood; sets record straight
A satirical website called the National Report intentionally made up an article for entertainment purposes on Sunday, Oct. 27, 2013 about the City of Dearborn enacting sharia law over the weekend. The article is false; Dearborn is not under sharia law and has never at any time even considered such an action.
“Dearborn has never been, nor ever will be, under sharia law. We are governed by the U.S. Constitution, the Constitution of the State of Michigan and the City of Dearborn Charter,” said Mayor O’Reilly.
“We are a city named after a Revolutionary War Hero. We have lost loyal Dearborn American military service personnel in every war this country has fought to protect the individual rights we are guaranteed through the U.S. Constitution,” he said.
“We are a community that proudly honors those who served our country to protect those rights. We have annual observances on Memorial Day, Flag Day, Korean War Armistice Day and Veterans Day,” said Mayor O’Reilly.
The phony article appeared on the National Report, a website meant to be humorous, and has since been posted on other websites and circulated over the internet.
It also has been reposted multiple times on Facebook by people who are taking the fictional article at face value, and then expressing outrage about something that is simply not true.
“The National Report’s misguided attempt at humor furthers the goals of some people who have tried to suggest that the City of Dearborn is anti-American because our population includes residents who are Muslim,” said Mayor O’Reilly.
People from across the country, state and region have been contacting the City of Dearborn upset about the false news story.
Many understand that it is not true, but are angry at the National Report for purposely making up the story.
Mayor O’Reilly said the phony story could impact people’s image of Dearborn, which is a city with strong community connections, excellent public services, and well-tended neighborhoods.
Dearborn has a diverse population, originally attracted to the city because of well-paying jobs at the Ford Rouge plant, the Ford World Headquarters and the Ford Research and Development Center.
The city also hosts other major employers, and remains a regional employment center, as well as a destination for shopping, cultural arts, recreation, night life, health care and higher education.
It is home to internationally-renown visitor attractions, led off by The Henry Ford: America’s Greatest History Attraction, which beckons more than a 1.7 million guests each year.
“This hoax has confused people, even some who are familiar with everything Dearborn has to offer, and who have enjoyed visiting our town in the past,” Mayor O’Reilly said.
“The National Report is not a news site, but is only pretending to be one. Its purpose is entertainment. In this case, its outrageous story, with no basis in fact, has ended up fooling people in part because it mirrors allegations made by others in the past with less than humorous intentions,” said Mayor O’Reilly.
“One unique aspect of our community is the strong working relationship that exists among our diverse faith leaders, who foster understanding and tolerance,” he said.
“It is in human nature to fear the unknown, which can lead to hate and attempts to deny the rights of others. But in Dearborn, that fear of the unknown is mitigated because leaders of many faiths regularly come together for dialogue and to celebrate the significant events of each others’ religions,” he said.
“We invite people to learn more about the real Dearborn,” Mayor O’Reilly said. “We want people to know we represent the best of America, our traditions and values, including following the rule of law under the U.S. Constitution.”
http://www.cityofdearborn.org/news-a...ecord-straight
Satirical website makes up ‘article’ on sharia law for humor; City of Dearborn not amused by falsehood; sets record straightQuote:
Originally Posted by johnwk
A satirical website called the National Report intentionally made up an article for entertainment purposes on Sunday, Oct. 27, 2013 about the City of Dearborn enacting sharia law over the weekend.
The article is false; Dearborn is not under sharia law and has never at any time even considered such an action. . .
It is not as false as you pretend! Have we forgotten the following story? See In the first majority-Muslim U.S. city, residents tense about its futureQuote:
Originally Posted by JohnDoe2
"Many longtime residents point to 2004 as the year they suspected that the town’s culture had shifted irrevocably. It was then that the city council gave permission to al-Islah Islamic Center to broadcast its call to prayer from speakers atop its roof.
“The Polish people think we were invading them,” said Masud Khan, one of the mosque’s leaders, recalling that time in an interview earlier this month. “We were a big threat to their religion and culture. Now their days are gone.”
The mosque, which attracts about 500 people for its Friday prayer services, has purchased a neighboring vacant limestone building in the heart of the city that once was a furniture store. The mosque’s leaders plan to put a minaret — a spire — on the building and use it to continue broadcasting a call to prayer five times a day."
Most Muslims come here without any intention of assimilating into our culture. They come here to advance their culture and impose it upon those around them. The facts cannot be changed to what they are not!
JWK
American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance a maternity ward for the poverty stricken populations of other countries who invade our borders to give birth.
The real propaganda is the city's press release.
The video is sort of misnamed as it really doesn't talk @ sharia law but a wealth of knowledge @ Dearborn in that, over 50% muslim population, mostly welfare receivers including their 4 wives each they say are relatives. The houses are single homes with lawns, paleeze, give our poor Americans those homes.
This is what obama and his brotherhood have done in many places. Let us not get into the female genital mutilation happening in the tens of thousands nor those that want to travel "home" and want their rent paid for by public assistance while they leave for 3months. Don't think our American citizen poor could afford to travel such distances - airfare is not cheap. Plus welfare payment to a single adult is @$200 a month and can only be administered for a limited period of time. Paleeze, these imports live quite well and receive much more than our citizens in public assistance. Corruption has been rampant in our highest office of the land.
So you will see denials put out by city, state, federal officials - part of the scam. But seeing is believing.
Like the sanctuary city mayors releasing statements of little crime by illegals and we want them to feel friended so they can report crimes happening - do you see illegals turning in the drug cartels that they ALL are connected with? Do you see them turning in fathers living elsewhere so he doesn't have to pay a dime for his children? How @ turning in killers, rapists, child molesters that flee, someone takes them in. Long list of crimes they DO NOT REPORT - yet the propaganda statements keep coming from officials.
Minnesota Senate Wavering On Bill Targeting Female Genital Mutilation Because Immigrant Groups Oppose It
Photo by Jahi Chikwendiu/The Washington Post via Getty Imageshttp://www.dailywire.com/sites/defau...?itok=RkOuAbpg
By:
Hank Berrien
May 25, 2017
The Minnesota Senate version of a bill passed by the Minnesota House that would punish parents who subjected their daughters to female genital mutilation (FGM) is stalling in the Senate because some members of Minnesota’s immigrant and refugee communities oppose it.
The House bill, introduced by Rep. Mary Franson, would make the crime a felony, with a concomitant loss of custody and a prison term ranging from five to 20 years. It would also increase penalties for anyone performing the procedure. Female genital mutilation has been illegal in the state since Minnesota passed legislation in the 1990's.
On September 30, 1996, Congress criminalized FGM as part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, writing, “Whoever knowingly circumcises, excises, or infibulates the whole or any part of the labia majora or labia minora or clitoris of another person who has not attained the age of 18 years shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.” But the law was not enforced until recently, when a Detroit doctor was arrested for performing the procedure.
But even before that, Minnesota had addressed the issue, and in a more far-reaching way. In 1994, Minnesota was the first state to enact legislation related to FGM. The state amended its criminal code to declare “whoever knowingly circumcises, excises, or infibulates, in whole or in part, the labia majora, labia minora, or clitoris of another is guilty of a felony.” Thus the state did not limit the crime to female victims under the age of 18, but extended the range of victims to include all women.
But now, the Council for Minnesotans of African Heritage, a nonprofit titled Isuroon and other groups assert that the punishment for the crime in the proposed legislation is unduly harsh and thus parents from countries where genital cutting is common would not seek medical care for their children. The Senate bill’s author, Sen. Karin Housley, said she was considering delaying a vote on the legislation, adding, “We all agree this practice is absolutely horrible, and something needs to be done. How can we empower communities to address this practice from within rather than having Big Brother come down and say, ‘This is wrong'? ”
Franson said the Senate was “more concerned with perception than doing the right thing and protecting girls ... Watering down the bill really does a disservice to the little girls who are in danger."
In the House, 124 out of 128 House members voted for the bill, including Rep. Ilhan Omar, the country’s first Somali-American legislator.
Opponents of the bill argue that parents who come to the United States with girls who have already undergone the procedure could be punished because the bill mandates reporting to authorities by health care providers.
Brikti Hiwet, a reproductive health lecturer at the University of Minnesota and St. Catherine University, commented, “How can you protect children when you take them away from their families and put them in foster care?”
But Franson pointed out the language in the bill limits penalties to those residing in the United States when the procedure is executed. She concluded, “America is the land of the brave and the home of the free. Little girls who moved here from other countries have the right to be free from the oppression of female genital mutilation.”
http://www.dailywire.com/news/16851/...aign=position6
May 27, 2017 By Kirsty Jane
ALERT: Muslim Sues Little Caesars Pizza Over Sharia Law
A Muslim man is suing Little Caesars for $100 million after he says he was served and then accidentally ate pepperoni made with pork, a food prohibited by Islamic law.
From Detroit Free PostThe complaint says Mohamad Bazzi of Dearborn ordered halal pizza twice from the shop on Schaefer in Dearborn. The boxes were labeled “halal,” but the pies inside were topped with regular pepperoni.
Majed Moughni, Bazzi’s attorney, said he rushed to file the lawsuit Thursday, the eve of Ramadan, so no other Muslims would accidentally eat pork from the pizza shop during the holiday.
“It’s really upsetting,” Moughni said. “My clients want the public to know. Especially during Ramadan, it would be a travesty if Muslims … in Dearborn bought pizza from Little Caesars and discovered they were eating pork.”
He added that for a Muslim, consuming pork is “one of the worst sins you can do.”
Jill Proctor, a spokeswoman for Little Caesars said in a statement that the company believes the claim “is without merit.”
“Little Caesars cherishes our customers from all religions and cultures, and the communities we serve are very important to us. While we can’t comment on pending litigation, we take this claim very seriously,” Proctor said.
The lawsuit, filed in Wayne County Circuit Court, says the first incident happened March 20. Bazzi and his wife were midway through eating a pizza he had brought home from the shop when they realized it had pork pepperoni.
Bazzi knew it was pork because he used to work in a pizza place and knows the different types of pepperoni, Moughni said. He also said Bazzi’s wife could tell because she is a Catholic convert to Islam who grew up eating pork.
They “became sick to their stomach,” according to the lawsuit. Three days later, they filed a police report.
The second incident happened May 24, the day before the lawsuit was filed.
When Bazzi confronted the shop manager, according to the lawsuit, she told him at one point that Bazzi had asked an employee to put a halal sticker on the pizza box, a claim Moughni disputes. Bazzi secretly recorded the conversation.
Halal is the Muslim equivalent of Judaism’s kosher and requires that meat be prepared according to Islamic guidelines, such as reciting a prayer while the animal is cut.
“There’s different schools of Islamic law that allows for the eating of chicken and beef, but there is no such thing as halal pork. The pork itself is forbidden,” Moughni said.
The lawsuit alleges breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, unjust enrichment and fraud. The case is against Little Caesars Pizza, Little Caesars Enterprises and the employees of the shop.
Moughni is seeking class-action status for the case.
The issue of non-halal food labeled as such has landed in court before. In 2011, McDonald’s was sued over claims that the fast-food restaurant was selling non-halal chicken it claimed was halal.
In some cases, employees at the Ford Road location in Dearborn were mistakenly giving non-halal products to customers who asked for halal ones.
The case was settled for $700,000. However, some Muslims, including a group led by Moughni, said the settlement money should have gone to the Muslims affected, not to organizations that were based in Detroit or not affiliated with Islam.
A judge at one point issued an injunction ordering Moughni not to talk about the settlement, but it was eventually lifted.
http://eheadlines.com/alert-muslim-s...er-sharia-law/
Protesters say genital mutilation doesn't happen just to girls, boys need protection too
USA TODAY NETWORK Tresa Baldas, Detroit Free Press Published 7:12 p.m. ET April 17, 2017 | Updated 6:51 a.m. ET April 18, 2017
https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/d4d...7-IMG-7559.JPG
(Photo: Detroit Free Press)
DETROIT — Protesters outside of the U.S. federal courthouse in Detroit argued Monday to outlaw circumcision of boys in the wake of last week's announcement of a highly publicized criminal case of female genital mutilation. The demonstrators say such mutilation doesn't just happen to girls and that boys need protection too.
The protest came as Dr. Jumana Nagarwala, 44, of Northville, Mich., appeared in court for a detention hearing at which she was ordered to remain locked up without bond on charges she mutilated the genitals of two Minnesota girls. She was charged last Thursday with genital mutilation following an FBI investigation into allegations that the two girls came to metro Detroit in February with their mothers and had their genitals cut at a Livonia clinic by Nagarwala.
While the case has triggered international headlines and sparked public outrage, the protesters said boys also need protection from this type of procedure, as they likened circumcision to genital mutilation.
“All babies should be protected and be able to keep their whole bodies,” said Julie Colon, 26, who attended the protest with her toddler son on her back. “There’s just no reason for any child to be altered at birth or, really, anytime.”
Read more:
Jody Farrugia, 35, a registered nurse at the Detroit Medical Center, said she has long been opposed to circumcision and tries to talk new parents out of it, but nobody seems willing to listen. “I see the risks and harms daily. I always encourage mothers to keep their sons intact but they don’t think twice. They think it’s gross, they think it’s cleaner.”Doctor accused of genital mutilation on girls
A doctor is charged with female genital mutilation. What is it?
“I still hear their screams from down the hallway. It haunts me.”
Faruggia said circumcision can cause a certain number of health complications, including too much skin being taken off, which can lead to painful and tight erections as an adult. It can contribute to male erectile dysfunction and sometimes a jagged cut means repeating the surgery, she said.
She was holding a sign that said "Only quacks cut healthy children." She noted that her son has not been circumcised and he is healthy.
https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/d19...656-nocirc.jpgVolunteers and organizers of NOCIRC of Michigan hold a demonstration outside of Theodore Levin Courthouse to express their concerns about male circumcision on Monday, April 17,2017 in Detroit. Dr. Jumana Nagarwala, who is charged with mutilating the genitals of young girls at a Livonia clinic, was in court for a bond hearing. (Photo: Elaine Cromie, Detroit Free Press)
Another protester was Jerry Boor, 70, of Rochester Hills, who believes both science and the Bible are against circumcision.
He noted that his mother had him circumcised but he chose not to circumcise his son after researching the issue and concluding it wasn’t a medical necessity. “I love her, but she didn’t know any better,” he said of his mother.
According to organizers of the protest, the genitals of 49,000 baby boys are cut in Michigan every year at the request of parents, denying a boy's right to intact and normal genitals.
They say they are upset that doctors are legally allowed to cut the genitals of boys, without any medical necessity, but that a federal law prohibits cutting the genitals of girls and makes it a five-year felony.
"The genitals of both girls and boys needs to be protected from the harm of any genital cutting practice," says Norm Cohen, executive director of NOCIRC of Michigan, a non-profit, consumer-rights advocacy group that researches circumcision effects. “Michigan has one of the highest rates of circumcision in the world. This unnecessary custom violates a child’s right to bodily integrity and normal functions.”
According to the group, in Michigan, 83% of newborn boys are circumcised at a cost of more than $11 million per year. The group said it believes that male circumcision is driven by the same reasons used to justify female genital mutilation: Tradition, cleanliness, appearance, medical myths, and sexual moderation.
https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/56d...4911001-vs.jpg
A Detroit area physician faces federal charges for allegedly performing female genital mutilation on multiple 6- to 7-year-old girls as part of a religious and cultural practice at a medical clinic in Livonia. Detroit Free Press
Opponents of female genital mutilation disagree and argue there are key differences in the procedures, specifically: there are more serious short-term and long-term health consequences for girls who undergo genital mutilation, where boys typically do not have those consequences; and the procedure is often performed on women with no anesthesia and in unsanitary conditions, where most circumcisions are performed in hospitals and with anesthesia.
As some medical experts on the topic stated in a 2015 article by The Atlantic:
"Male circumcision does no harm. Female gender mutilation does. Male circumcision cuts the foreskin, FGM cuts the clitoris — the two things cut are not even remotely the same.
For male circumcision to be equivalent to FGM, the entire tip of the male’s penis would need to be cut off ... Constantly trying to claim they are equivalent practices when they are not takes away from the unique seriousness of female 'circumcision/mutilation,' as most cases are performed during a traumatic developmental period and remove most sexual sensation, which is not true with male circumcision."
Circumcision opponents, however, argue that polls indicate that most parents decide to circumcise their sons for reasons other than health care, but physicians profit by promoting it and convincing insurance companies to pay for it.
“Doctors and hospitals profit by perpetuating the myth that infant circumcision is health care. It is not," Cohen states. "It is a harmful custom that removes a normal, functioning part of a child’s genitals at the request of parents."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...ase/100582718/
There is no comparison, they are just trying to have their way re females. Would not consider circumcision mutilation as it enhances hygiene but what they do to females is mutilation and devastating.