Results 1 to 1 of 1

Thread: Should U.S. strike Syria for ( allegedly) using chemical weapons?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

LinkBack
- LinkBack URL
- About LinkBacks
- Bookmark & Share
- Digg this Thread!
- Add Thread to del.icio.us
- Bookmark in Technorati
- Tweet this thread
Thread Tools
Display
- Linear Mode
- Switch to Hybrid Mode
- Switch to Threaded Mode

08-31-2013, 09:44 AM #1
AirborneSapper7

Senior Member

Join Date

May 2007

Location

South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)

Posts

117,696
Should U.S. strike Syria for ( allegedly) using chemical weapons?
Should U.S. strike Syria for ( allegedly) using chemical weapons?

No (77%, 872 Votes)

Let Congress decide. (20%, 225 Votes)

Yes (3%, 39 Votes)

Total Voters: 1,136

http://www.bizpacreview.com/2013/08/...uicksand-82458
Share

Share this post on

Digg

Del.icio.us

Technorati

Twitter
Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
Reply With Quote

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Tags for this Thread

chemical weapons, syria

Posting Permissions

You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
[VIDEO] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:28 AM.

Paid for by AMERICANS FOR LEGAL IMMIGRATION PAC (ALIPAC)
PO Box 30966,
Raleigh, NC 27622-0966
Tel: (919) 787-6009
FEC ID: C00405878

We are the world's largest archive of information about Illegal Immigration and are archived in the Library of Congress