Results 1 to 3 of 3
Like Tree5Likes

Thread: Supreme Court Agrees to Rule on Trump Travel Ban

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member European Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    France
    Posts
    4,548

    Post Supreme Court Agrees to Rule on Trump Travel Ban

    Supreme Court Agrees to Rule on Trump Travel Ban

    The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide the legality of the latest version of President Donald Trump's ban on travel to the United States by residents of six majority-Muslim countries.

    The issue pits an administration that considers the restrictions necessary for Americans' security against challengers who claim it is illegally aimed at Muslims and stems from Trump's campaign call for a "complete shutdown of Muslims" entering the U.S.

    The justices plan to hear argument in April and issue a final ruling by late June on a Trump policy that has been repeatedly blocked and struck down in the lower courts.

    The latest of those rulings came last month when the federal appeals court in San Francisco ruled that the travel ban Trump announced in September violates federal immigration law.

    The federal appeals court in Richmond, Virginia, also is considering a challenge to the ban.

    Last month, the high court said the ban could be fully enforced while appeals made their way through the courts.

    The policy applies to travelers from Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen. It also affects two non-Muslim countries: blocking travelers from North Korea and some Venezuelan government officials and their families.

    The Supreme Court has never ruled on whether any of the three versions of the travel ban is legal. The court agreed last June to take up the second version until it expired in the early fall.

    Trump's first travel ban was issued almost a year ago, almost immediately after he took office, and was aimed at seven countries. It triggered chaos and protests across the U.S. as travelers were stopped from boarding international flights and detained at airports for hours. Trump tweaked the order after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit refused to reinstate the ban.

    The next version, unveiled in March, dropped Iraq from the list of covered countries and made it clear the 90-day ban covering Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen didn't apply to those travelers who already had valid visas. It also got rid of language that would give priority to religious minorities. Critics said the changes didn't erase the legal problems with the ban.

    The same appeals courts that are evaluating the current policy agreed with the challengers. The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond said the ban "drips with religious intolerance, animus and discrimination." The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Trump violated immigration law.

    The Supreme Court allowed the ban to take partial effect, but said those with a claim of a "bona fide" relationship with someone in the United States could not be kept out of the country. Grandparents, cousins and other relatives were among those who could not be excluded.

    But the high court said lower courts were wrong to apply the same limits to the new policy, at least while it is being appealed. The justices did not explain their brief order.

    The third version is permanent, unlike the other two, and the administration said it is the product of a thorough review by several agencies of how other countries' screen their own citizens and share information with the U.S.

    Solicitor General Noel Francisco said in court papers that the policy is well within the president's "broad authority to suspend or restrict the entry of aliens outside the United States when he deems it in the Nation's interest."

    In response, the challengers said the policy violates the Constitution because it is biased against Muslims and also violates immigration law. The new version continues "the same unlawful policy" that was struck down by lower courts last year, lawyer Neal Katyal said in his brief on behalf of the challengers.

    Supreme Court Agrees to Rule on Trump Travel Ban
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member southBronx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    4,773
    Obama this is all your doing & Hillary are you both happy now . But now we have a President that care about us & we will stand by him he know what best . Trump don't back down ship every one of them back home . (Dreamer's my foot)

  3. #3
    Moderator Beezer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    31,048
    We need this ban and add more countries to it.

    We need to get systems up in place for better tracking.

    We need to DEPORT every Visa overstay out of the country!

    We need to DEPORT every illegal alien, refugee and asylum liar.

    We need to DEPORT every anchor baby...they are NOT US Citizens!
    ILLEGAL ALIENS HAVE "BROKEN" OUR IMMIGRATION SYSTEM

    DO NOT REWARD THEM - DEPORT THEM ALL

Similar Threads

  1. Trump to Ask Supreme Court to Block Travel Ban Ruling
    By lorrie in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-15-2017, 02:53 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-25-2017, 10:57 AM
  3. 16 states ask Supreme Court to revive Trump travel ban
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-07-2017, 09:00 AM
  4. Justice Department will ask Supreme Court to review court’s ruling on Trump travel ba
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-25-2017, 10:34 PM
  5. Supreme Court Agrees to Rule on Health Law
    By JohnDoe2 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-14-2011, 08:37 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •