Thread: Syrian Snipers Using Unborn Babies As Target Practice to Win Cigarettes - Video

2 hours ago by Janna Brock

Syrian Snipers Using Unborn Babies As Target Practice to Win Cigarettes

8 Comments

Of all the horrors inflicted by mankind, this has to be the most ghastly. It has been reported that Syrian snipers are shooting pregnant women, specifically targeting their unborn children. They are also shooting children. All innocent civilians are being used as target practice for these ruthless snipers, allegedly working for the Assad regime. With Al-Qaeda rebels battling the Assad regime for supremacy, the death toll continues to swell. No one is safe from the atrocities, not even the unborn. What's even more depraved is that this is all for a packet of cigarettes for the winner of the target practice.



The Syrian conflict has taken an even darker turn. Al-Qaeda rebels, aided by the United States, have been battling the Assad regime for months now, raging war against Christians. They have killed, maimed, and executed those who would not convert to Islam. Yet, all the while, the U.S. has pledged support for these monsters, the very Islamic savages who perpetrated 9/11.

Horrifying: The x-ray image shows a full-term baby with a bullet lodged in its brain, shot dead in its mother's womb

However, Syrian snipers, are now doing the unthinkable. Using pregnant women as targets, they are specifically aiming at their unborn fetuses, putting bullets in their still forming brains. It's the ultimate sickness and depravity.

Allegedly working for the Assad regime, this is all a game for the snipers. This is target practice, and the winner gets a complimentary pack of cigarettes. Take a life, get a cigarette. This couldn't be more repulsive.

David Nott, a British surgeon who recently returned from Syria after volunteering at a hospital for five weeks, told Britain's Times (of London) newspaper that snipers were targeting different body parts of civilians who were out to buy food and supplies.

"One day it would be shots to the groin. The next, it would only be the left chest. The day after, we would see no chest wounds; they were all neck," Nott said. "From the first patients that came in in the morning, you could almost tell what you would see for the rest of the day. It was a game. We heard the snipers were winning packets of cigarettes for hitting the correct number of targets."

Nott noticed that snipers targeted at least six pregnant women in one day, and they shot in a way that the women survived but their unborn babies died. "The women were all shot through the uterus, so that must have been where they were aiming for.

I can't even begin to tell you how awful it was. Usually, civilians are caught in the crossfire. This is the first time I've ever seen anything like this. This was deliberate. It was hell beyond hell."

This truly is hell on earth. To shoot a pregnant woman in the uterus is unthinkable and unfathomable, but theses monsters do it at random, and without conscience. This is Islam. For the United States and any other country to choose to support one side over another as more "tolerable" is diseased thinking.

Assad is propped up by Russia, Iran, and Hezbollah. Bashar Al-Assad isn't going anywhere unless the Al-Qaeda rebels, or Israeli forces, take him out. And with chemical weapons inspections taking place and weapons being destroyed, these vicious Syrian snipers are wreaking havoc on civilians.

Some of the locals think the snipers are coming from China and Azerbaijan in an effort to aid President Assad.

Snipers are targeting women and children as they fetch food and supplies. such as here in Homs where a girl is seen collecting water

Dr. David Mott has worked in war zones before. He has gone to Bosnia, Libya, Chad, Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo.His visit to Syria was supported by charities Syria Relief, Hand in Hand for Syria, and the Syrian British Medical Society. Mott knows war zones, but this was much worse than imagined. He revealed how hard it is to enter rebel-controlled areas in order to aid civilians caught up in the bloodshed.

Assad has been accused of executing a chemical weapons attack on his own people, but in light of these revelations, one has to wonder if this is just the Assad regime's work, or if Al-Qaeda rebels are also involved in these sniper attacks.

Regardless, this shows the true nature of Islam. Dead children, women, and shooting unborn babies like they were clay pigeons. There is no regard for life. Islam is death, even before life begins.

Putting a bullet in a baby's brain for a "prize." This is proof of Islam's horror. Al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, the Muslim Brotherhood, and Hamas, it doesn't matter. All roads in Islam lead to the same end: terror and death. Secular Islam is the biggest scam ever believed and propagated by the West. The proof is in the actions, in the endless cycle of death and violence. Living and dying by the sword is the essence of Islam. And killing all in it's path, Muslim or not. Even those who are still in utero.

http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/10/he...rget-practice/

These are Barry's Boy'Z and John McCain's Hero's

Feel Good Moment :Syrian Jihadists Accidentally Blow Themselves Up

Posted on Thursday, October 17th, 2013 at 10:10 pm. by: Benjamin Franklin



via redflagnews
LOL



http://www.conservativeinfidel.com/u...dentally-blow/

British Press Shills for Syria War With ‘Baby Snipers’ Story

by Ron Paul Institute on October 21, 2013

The Times of London yesterday published a sensational Syria story based on an interview with British doctor David Nott, who had volunteered his medical expertise in Syria over the past several weeks. Dr. Nott said that he had seen several pregnant women come in with abdominal wounds. He speculated that snipers must have been playing some sort of game where they would target the fetuses of pregnant women — a grisly business to be sure.
Said Dr. Nott:

It seemed to me that it was some sort of a game they (the snipers) were having with each other… One day we’d have pregnant women being brought in with gunshot wounds to the uterus. Not just one or two, but seven or eight, which meant to me they (the snipers) must be targeting pregnant women.

Nott “heard local rumors” that these snipers, who seemed were playing a game, were Chinese or Azeri mercenaries fighting with Assad’s government forces.
None of this was confirmed in any way. Speculation.
But how did Rupert Murdoch’s Times of London report this very imprecise bit of speculation on the part of Dr. Nott — in a huge dramatic spread?
“Assad’s snipers target unborn babies”
How is that for thorough journalism?
With no additional or collaborating reporting, the Daily Mail took the story several steps further. It reported that Dr. Nott heard “local rumors” that snipers were rewarded a cigarette for each fetus they successfully murdered in the womb. Proof? None. A rumor. How horrific and spectacularly diabolical if true, but does it make sense? If indeed this is some sort of sick game played out by snipers, how exactly do they verify that a fetus has been killed while inside the mother’s womb so as to claim their cigarette? It doesn’t sound right.
And where is any evidence that the snipers were government troops? We do know that the insurgents make regular use of snipers, and in fact just today they shot and killed Gen. Jameh Jameh, a senior government intelligence official. We also know that insurgent snipers are holed up in the caves above the Christian village of Maaloula, where they terrorize the local civilian population. Insurgent snipers also routinely target journalists.
The Times piece (and several related pieces in the British press) was accompanied by a gruesome-looking x-ray of a fetus with what looked like a large caliber bullet lodged in its skull. Strangely enough, this large bullet seems to have passed through the mother’s body and into the skull of the fetus, passing through the soft tissue and resting perfectly and dramatically in the frontal lobe of the brain — with no visible damage to the baby’s cranium. Why no skull damage? Why no visible point of entry?
Also, we are told throughout the article that the doctors there are managing with virtually no medical resources and in a combat situation. Why would a doctor in such a crisis situation take the time and limited resources to x-ray an already dead baby? Does it make sense?
Incidentally, the photograph was provided to a range of British media by a British “NGO” called “Syria Relief,” which claims the photo was provided by a “Syria Relief media team inside Syria.” This may be a legitimate NGO, but its website is incredibly reticent to provide any information about the organization, its founders, its officers, its trustees, and its funders.
Interestingly, Dr. Nott is listed as one-time doctor to former British Prime Minister and war profiteer Tony Blair…
The Times, Independent, Daily Mail, ITV, and others are Goebbles-like in their transparently pro-war propaganda. They have fallen over themselves to print another “babies yanked from incubators” story. Only the Israeli YNET outlet was skeptical of the bloody British claim. “Record cruelty: Syrian rebels target fetuses,” is how the Israeli news site put it. Perhaps, but at least there is solid past evidence of such terroristic acts on the part of the rebels.
Shame on Rupert Murdoch’s bloody Times.

Tell Congress: Stop Obama from funding the Syrian Rebels! Sign the petition.

Tagged as: british press, propaganda, ron paul institute, syria, syrian civil war

http://www.conservativeactionalerts....snipers-story/

http://www.alipac.us/f9/rights-group...crimes-290654/