Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040

    Private meetings at Trump's Mar-a-Lago raise questions about access

    By MARGARET BRENNAN CBS NEWS April 21, 2017, 7:15 PM

    Private meetings at Trump's Mar-a-Lago raise questions about access

    WASHINGTON -- President Trump has been in office for 91 days. He has spent 25 of them at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida, often mingling with members and guests.

    Since the election, the cost of membership has doubled to $200,000.




    Mr. Trump often railed against pay-to-play politics on the campaign trail, repeatedly slamming a “broken system.”



    Yet the access at Mar-a-Lago is unparalleled. Last weekend, two former presidents of Colombia were guests and quietly met with Mr. Trump.

    Former Colombian President Andres Pastrana later tweeted about the meeting, thanking Mr. Trump for “the cordial and very frank conversation about the problems and prospects in Colombia and the region.”


    The two men are opponents of current Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, who has not yet met with Mr. Trump. The encounter was not on Mr. Trump’s public schedule.


    Five days later, White House press secretary Sean Spicer seemed surprised to hear about it.


    “I’m just saying I’m unaware of the circumstances,” Spicer told reporters.


    The White House later said the men “briefly said hello when the president walked past them.”


    Club members have posted photos with military officers and even with the president himself.



    RICHARD DEAGAZIO
    Democrats in Congress have called on the White House to release names of visitors to all Trump properties, saying the American people have a right to know who has access to the president.

    The images of an open-air meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe caused a controversy in February. The leaders were formulating a response to a North Korean missile test in full view of club members and guests. They condemned the missile launch soon after.


    The Government Accountability Office is also probing security at the resort and if classified information and secure communications are adequately protected. As we head into the summer, the president is expected to spend more of his time at another club in New Jersey.

    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/private-...-about-access/


    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    The Government Accountability Office is also probing security at the resort and if classified information and secure communications are adequately protected. As we head into the summer, the president is expected to spend more of his time at another club in New Jersey.
    No one is getting their stories out of Mar-A-Lago. They're selling stories about not being able to get stories out of Mar-A-Lago, which tells me the security is better at Mar-A-Lago than anywhere else. That's the reason the press and the DemoQuacks can't stand it when Trump is at Mar-A-Lago.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    Secret meeting at Mar-a-Lago raises questions about Colombia peace and Trump

    BY FRANCO ORDOÑEZ AND ANITA KUMAR
    McClatchy Washington Bureau

    BOGOTÁ, COLOMBIA President Donald Trump quietly met a pair of former Colombian presidents last weekend at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, thrusting his administration into an ugly power struggle in Latin America that threatens to undermine the country’s controversial peace agreement with rebel leaders.

    Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos is expected to push Trump to support the peace accord with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia at their first meeting at the White House next month. He wants the Trump administration and Congress to maintain the $450 million in foreign aid promised by former President Barack Obama to implement the plan to end Latin America’s longest armed conflict.


    The meeting between Trump and the former presidents, Álvaro Uribe and Andrés Pastrana – Colombia news media have reported it was arranged by an influential U.S. critic of the plan, Republican U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida – was not on the president’s schedule and was not disclosed to reporters who traveled with him to Palm Beach.


    White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer initially declined to answer questions about the meeting, leading to a rash of speculation in Colombian media. Colombian newspapers, websites and radio stations debated the meeting’s significance — and whether it actually had happened. “I don’t have anything for you at this time,” Spicer said Wednesday when asked.


    The White House later confirmed the meeting to McClatchy but downplayed its significance, saying it was a mere coincidence that both former leaders opposed to the peace pact were at the president’s club. Aides to Rubio declined to comment.


    “They were there with a member from the club and briefly said hello when the president walked past them,” spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders said. “There wasn’t anything beyond a quick hello.”

    But the leaders’ own comments contradict the White House’s characterization.


    In a tweet following the meeting, Pastrana thanked Trump for the “cordial and very frank conversation” about problems in Colombia and the region.


    Uribe was unavailable for an interview, but his former vice president, Francisco Santos, said it was important that the Trump administration and U.S. Congress hear a more complete picture of the reality in Colombia. He described the meeting as short, but with a clear message. The former presidents raised concerns about the situation in Venezuela and Colombia, including damage they say the peace process has caused.


    “We’re very worried,” said Francisco Santos, who is the Bogotá chair of Uribe’s Democratic Center political party and the current president’s cousin. “You have a perfect storm, and the government says everything is going fine and we’re living in peace. And that’s not true.”


    The Mar-a-Lago meeting coincided with a letter Uribe wrote to the Trump administration and Congress, which he published on Twitter, warning that President Santos’ efforts to complete a peace deal with the rebels could lead to Colombia becoming an authoritarian state similar to Venezuela.


    The undisclosed meeting also raises a number of questions about the ease with which people trying to influence Trump can access him through membership in his club without fear of public disclosure; a Mar-a-Lago membership costs $200,000 for the initiation alone.


    “It suggests that the people who patronize the president’s businesses have more influence than the rest of us,” said Noah Bookbinder, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a government watchdog group.


    The White House did not say which Mar-a-Lago member had accompanied the leaders to the resort. Members’ names are not public, though some have leaked out since Trump became president.


    The meeting also raised questions about whether Trump intends to support the Colombia peace plan, the result of years of negotiations to end five decades of combat with the insurgency group, which is known by its Spanish initials as the FARC.

    Santos received the Nobel Peace Prize last year for his efforts at negotiating a deal.


    Spicer and Sanders did not answer questions about whether Trump supports the peace pact.


    Rubio, whose wife is the daughter of Colombian immigrants, has been critical of the peace process. He shares the views of many Colombians that it is inappropriate to negotiate with a guerrilla group known for drug trafficking and kidnappings. He repeatedly has noted that the FARC remains a U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organization, and he has argued that Congress shouldn’t commit any additional money to the Colombian government until the peace plan is approved by the Colombian people.


    An initial peace deal narrowly lost in a referendum in October.

    Santos then reopened negotiations with the rebels, but he bypassed a referendum in favor of submitting the deal to the Colombian Congress, which approved it in November.


    The Colombian government criticized the former presidents for going outside diplomatic channels and taking the country’s “dirty laundry” to the White House.


    Juan Carlos Pinzón, Colombia’s ambassador to the United States, said it was important not to oversimplify the meeting. He noted that Colombia has a long record of strong bipartisan relations with the U.S. Congress.


    Santos was the second Latin American president to speak with Trump after the American was sworn into office. In their 25-minute call, Santos asked Trump to support the U.S. funding to back the country’s peace deal. Santos, who is seen as an “Obamanista” who publicly lobbied for Trump’s Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, has described Trump’s politics as “not in line with what Colombia wants.”


    Pinzón said the Colombian government must respect that Trump had his own way of doing things but that it was dangerous for the former presidents totake Colombia’s polarized politics to the United States, which could damage the country’s bipartisan support.


    “We need to address these issues at home,” Pinzón told W Radio in Colombia. “We need to wash our dirty laundry at home.”


    Follow

    Andrés Pastrana A
    @AndresPastrana_

    Gracias a @POTUS @realDonaldTrump por la cordial y muy franca conversación sobre problemas y perspectivas de Colombia y la región.
    6:26 PM - 14 Apr 2017




    Arlene Tickner, a professor of international relations at Rosario University in Bogotá, said it was disconcerting for the leaders to be campaigning against a sitting president and the peace process.
    “I think they’re hoping to get the Congress to hold back on funding to the government in order to gain leverage vis-à-vis the process,” Tickner said. “And obviously Uribe is posturing, trying to position himself and his party with an eye to the next elections.”

    Last year, Obama promised to throw the White House’s full support behind the historic peace accord, including a pledge of $450 million in aid annually to help pay for regional development and to demobilize and reintegrate around 7,000 fighters.


    That money is now in doubt as the Trump administration plans to slash foreign aid as part of 31 percent cuts to the State Department’s budget.


    “If you’re going to reduce foreign assistance, you have to go to the places where assistance is provided,” said Eric Farnsworth, a former State Department official who is now vice president of the Washington-based Council of the Americas.


    Colombia, the fourth largest economy in Latin America, is considered a major success story for U.S. foreign policy. The U.S. has provided more than $10 billion in aid to Colombia since 2000, supported by both Republican and Democratic administrations, to combat drugs and drug-related violence. But coca cultivation has soared to levels not seen in decades, and some see Trump’s hard-line rhetoric on keeping drugs out of the United States as more sympathetic to the opposition.


    YOU HAVE A PERFECT STORM AND THE GOVERNMENT SAYS EVERYTHING IS GOING FINE AND WE’RE LIVING IN PEACE.

    Francisco Santos, former vice president of Colombia

    While Colombia may not get all the money, Santos needs, at a minimum, some form of support for the peace process, said Sandra Borda,a professor of political science and international relations at University of the Andes in Bogotá. A reduction in aid can be explained as part of Trump’s budget cuts, but not supporting the peace plan could be politically crippling for Santos, Borda said.


    The United States continues to have an outsized role in Colombia’s internal politics. A Trump declaration of support would go a long way to shoring up Santos’ domestic backing.

    Anything less would fuel opposition efforts ahead of next year’s presidential election.


    “If you have a president in the United States who is opposed to the peace process, it’s a form of undermining the legitimacy of the peace process,” Borda said.

    http://www.miamiherald.com/news/poli...145805169.html
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. GOP Sen. Ernst says Trump should spend less time at Mar-a-Lago
    By JohnDoe2 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-18-2017, 09:45 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-19-2017, 07:39 PM
  3. Trump Adviser’s Ties Raise Security Questions
    By European Knight in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-07-2016, 02:06 PM
  4. Lawsuits raise questions about private prisons
    By MyAmerica in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-04-2008, 09:23 PM
  5. Judicial Watch Files Lawsuit Seeking Access to SPP Meetings
    By avenger in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-16-2007, 05:37 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •