Results 1 to 9 of 9
Like Tree13Likes

Thread: Senator Schumer’s wish list to end the government shutdown

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member johnwk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    2,484

    Senator Schumer’s wish list to end the government shutdown

    .

    It seems quite clear that Chucky Boy Schumer is demanding the following laundry list to end his filibuster which has caused our federal government to close down.


    Schumer wants permanent residency for the DACA children, most of whom are over 25 years old.


    Schumer wants citizenship granted, within a few years, to the DACA children.


    Schumer wants legal entry and residency granted the relatives of DACA children


    Schumer wants citizenship granted to the relatives of DACA children within a few years.


    If these demands are granted Schumer will then end his filibuster and also give funding for the “wall”.


    Of course Schumer will give funding for the wall because the wall will no longer be an obstacle to import the estimated 20 million more democrat voters which his above demands will bring.


    And it seems very likely that Senator Lindsey Graham negotiated this list of demands with Chucky Boy Schumer.


    JWK




    American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance a maternity ward for the poverty stricken populations of other countries who invade America’s borders to give birth.


  2. #2
    Super Moderator GeorgiaPeach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    21,835
    They want everything to guarantee the broadest and the largest amnesty possible to as many people as possible. They want to shame President Trump and to continue the Schumer Shutdown till he caves to their demands. Many republicans will assist.

    The democrats want to get their millions of new democrat voters. They want to see as many anchor babies as possible born to solidify a permanent democrat voting block who will be dependent on government services and therefore they will be more easy to control. The truth however is that this group is unstable, radical, socialist leaning and a real threat to our nation. They will continue with never ending demands and demonstrations, sit-ins, riots, intimidation tactics. They are connected to groups trying to destablize our country, ready to call them up for action. The American people are in a precarious situation if amnesty of any size is given. The troubles of California are expanding into other states and a decade or two can see the same results if amnesty if given, if democrats gain control, and if the demographic changes continue at such a fast pace.
    Matthew 19:26
    But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
    ____________________

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)


  3. #3
    Senior Member johnwk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    2,484
    Quote Originally Posted by GeorgiaPeach View Post
    They want everything to guarantee the broadest and the largest amnesty possible to as many people as possible. They want to shame President Trump and to continue the Schumer Shutdown till he caves to their demands. Many republicans will assist.

    The democrats want to get their millions of new democrat voters. They want to see as many anchor babies as possible born to solidify a permanent democrat voting block who will be dependent on government services and therefore they will be more easy to control. The truth however is that this group is unstable, radical, socialist leaning and a real threat to our nation. They will continue with never ending demands and demonstrations, sit-ins, riots, intimidation tactics. They are connected to groups trying to destablize our country, ready to call them up for action. The American people are in a precarious situation if amnesty of any size is given. The troubles of California are expanding into other states and a decade or two can see the same results if amnesty if given, if democrats gain control, and if the demographic changes continue at such a fast pace.
    I just hope President Trump does not cave. He needs to post, or is that "tweet" the destructive demands Schumer wants to end his filibuster.


    JWK


    If we can make 51 percent of America’s population dependent upon, welfare, food stamp, section 8 housing, college loan checks, and now free Obamacare being given to illegal aliens, we can blackmail them for their vote, keep ourselves in power and keep the remaining portion of America’s productive citizens enslaved to pay the bills ____ Our Washington Establishment’s Free Cheese Democracy, designed to establish a federal plantation which redistributes wealth that wage earners, business and investors have worked to create.

  4. #4
    Super Moderator GeorgiaPeach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    21,835
    just hope President Trump does not cave. He needs to post, or is that "tweet" the destructive demands Schumer wants to end his fi
    I believe we all agree with you, johnwk.
    Matthew 19:26
    But Jesus beheld them, and said unto them, With men this is impossible; but with God all things are possible.
    ____________________

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)


  5. #5
    Senior Member lorrie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Redondo Beach, California
    Posts
    6,765
    He should be thrown out of government!


    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty
    by joining our E-mail Alerts athttp://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  6. #6
    Member MagicCity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    S FL
    Posts
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by johnwk View Post
    .

    It seems quite clear that Chucky Boy Schumer is demanding the following laundry list to end his filibuster which has caused our federal government to close down.


    Schumer wants permanent residency for the DACA children, most of whom are over 25 years old.


    Schumer wants citizenship granted, within a few years, to the DACA children.


    Schumer wants legal entry and residency granted the relatives of DACA children


    Schumer wants citizenship granted to the relatives of DACA children within a few years.


    If these demands are granted Schumer will then end his filibuster and also give funding for the “wall”.


    Of course Schumer will give funding for the wall because the wall will no longer be an obstacle to import the estimated 20 million more democrat voters which his above demands will bring.


    And it seems very likely that Senator Lindsey Graham negotiated this list of demands with Chucky Boy Schumer.


    JWK




    American citizens are sick and tired of being made into tax-slaves to finance a maternity ward for the poverty stricken populations of other countries who invade America’s borders to give birth.

    To hell with Chuck Schumer, the Democrats, Lindsey Graham and the other RINOs! Our government should not provide amnesty to any illegal aliens! Ever! Apparently due to the shutdown, none of our politicians in D.C. are answering their phones but I urge all of my fellow ALIPACers to call their Congressmen and Senators anyway and leave a message.

  7. #7
    Senior Member johnwk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    2,484

    Common sense immigration rules make Democrat leaders’ heads explode. Why?


    President Trump has identified four requirements which must be agreed upon with any DACA legislation. They are:



    An end to chain migration;


    a merit based immigration system;


    a secured border with a physical wall were necessary;


    and an end to the suicidal immigration lottery system.


    Why do these common sense requirements make our open border Fifth Column's heads expload and cause them to shut down our federal government?


    JWK




    Without a Fifth Column Media, Yellow Journalism and a corrupted FBI, Loretta Lynch, Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama, would be making license tags in a federal penitentiary
    Last edited by johnwk; 01-23-2018 at 10:22 AM.

  8. #8
    Moderator Beezer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    30,909
    END BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP NOW!
    ILLEGAL ALIENS HAVE "BROKEN" OUR IMMIGRATION SYSTEM

    DO NOT REWARD THEM - DEPORT THEM ALL

  9. #9
    Senior Member johnwk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    2,484

    Judge Napolitano distorts 14th Amendment on FoxNews regarding birthright Citizenship

    Quote Originally Posted by Beezer View Post
    END BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP NOW!


    See: Judge Nap: Trump's Deportation Vow Is Prohibited By Constitution
    8/17/15

    ”Judge Andrew Napolitano explained this morning on "America's Newsroom" what Trump can and cannot do on immigration. He said that Trump's promise to deport children born in America to illegal immigrant mothers is "prohibited by the Constitution."

    "The Constitution says very clearly, whoever is born here - no matter the intent of the parent - is a natural-born citizen. He could not change that. Even if he were to change the Constitution, it would not affect people who had already been born here. It would only affect people not yet born here," said Napolitano.”


    Why FoxNews allows this propaganda to go unchallenged is suspect to say the least! Let us look at some historical facts.


    We are led to believe that if a foreigner enters our country illegally and gives birth to a child, that child, because of the 14th Amendment, becomes a citizen of the United States upon birth. As we shall see, that is one of the biggest myths alleged concerning the text and legislative intent of the 14th Amendment. Let us look at some documented facts.


    In IN RE SLAUGHTER-HOUSE CASES, 83 U.S. 36 (1872) the Court states the following regarding the 14th Amendment:

    “That its main purpose was to establish the citizenship of the negro can admit of no doubt. The phrase, subject to its jurisdiction' was intended to exclude from its operation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States“.

    And in Elk v. Wilkins (1884) the Court affirms the Court’s opinion in the Slaughter-House cases:

    ”Now, I take it that the children of aliens, whose parents have not only not renounced their allegiance to their native country . . . must necessarily remain themselves subject to the same sovereignty as their parents, and cannot, in the nature of things, be, any more than their parents, completely subject to the jurisdiction of such other country”


    '”This section contemplates two sources of citizenship, and two sources only,-birth and naturalization. The persons declared to be citizens are 'all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof .' The evident meaning of these last words is, not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate allegiance”

    So why would the Court indicate the wording in the 14th Amendment which declares “and subject to its jurisdiction” was intended to exclude from citizenship “children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States“?

    The answer is to be found in the Congressional Globe, 39th Congress, which framed and debated the 14th Amendment. For example, in discussing the proposed 14th Amendment, Senator Howard explains the clear intentions of the 14th Amendment as follows:

    The first amendment is to section one, declaring that all "persons born in the United States and Subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside. I do not propose to say anything on that subject except that the question of citizenship has been fully discussed in this body as not to need any further elucidation, in my opinion. This amendment which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country.(my emphasis) see: Congressional Globe, 39th Congress (1866) pg. 2890

    Later, and after the question was repeatedly asked as to who is and who is not a citizen of the United States, Mr. TRUMBULL responds as follows SEE: page 2893, Congressional Globe, 39th Congress (1866)
    1st column halfway down

    “The provision is, that “all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.” That means “subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof.” . . . “What do we mean by “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States?” Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means.”

    Mr. Trumbull later emphasizes in crystal clear language that: “It cannot be said of any Indian who owes allegiance, partial allegiance if you please, to some other Government that he is “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States”


    Mr. JOHNSON then rises to say: “…there is no definition in the Constitution as it now stands as to citizenship. Who is a citizen of the United States is an open question….there is no definition as to how citizenship can exist in the United States except through the medium of a citizenship in a State.

    “Now, all that this amendment provides is, that all persons born in the United States and not subject to some foreign Power--for that, no doubt, is the meaning of the committee who have brought the matter before us--shall be considered as citizens of the United States.”
    …he then continues “…the amendment says that citizenship may depend upon birth, and I know of no better way to give rise to citizenship than the fact of birth within the territory of the United States, born of parents who at the time were subject to the authority of the United States.”

    And then there is John A. Bingham, chief architect of the 14th Amendments first section who considered the proposed national law on citizenship as “simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen…” Cong. Globe, page 1291(March 9, 1866) middle column half way down.

    And so, a baby born to a foreign national mother while on American soil is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment, nor becomes a citizen of the United States upon birth.

    So why is FoxNews allowing Judge Napolitano distortions to go unchallenged?


    JWK



    "The Constitution is the act of the people, speaking in their original character, and defining the permanent conditions of the social alliance; and there can be no doubt on the point with us, that every act of the legislative power contrary to the true intent and meaning of the Constitution, is absolutely null and void. ___ Chancellor James Kent, in his Commentaries on American Law [1858]

Similar Threads

  1. Live Updates – Schumer Amnesty Shutdown: Washington on Edge as Cliff Approaches
    By GeorgiaPeach in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 01-22-2018, 02:42 PM
  2. Will News Media Recall Schumer's 2013 Vow to Not Shutdown Over Immigration?
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-18-2018, 02:22 PM
  3. Trump May Need A Government Shutdown This Week...And Other Shutdown News
    By Judy in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-16-2018, 03:38 AM
  4. Senator Schumer, You are Wrong!
    By MontereySherry in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-20-2010, 11:20 AM
  5. Senator Schumer: H-1B use undercuts pay
    By artclam in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-18-2010, 09:21 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •