Thread: Trump nominee for top Agriculture post withdraws amid Russia probe

Trump nominee for top Agriculture post withdraws amid Russia probe

By Evan Perez, Jeff Zeleny, Manu Raju and Dan Merica, CNN
Updated 1:08 PM ET, Thu November 2, 2017

(CNN) Sam Clovis, President Donald Trump's nominee to be the Department of Agriculture's chief scientist, withdrew himself from consideration Thursday, the White House announced.

"We respect Mr. Clovis' decision to withdraw his nomination," White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said in a statement to pool reporters.

Trump had picked Clovis for the position despite him not having a background in science, and that lack of experience, alongside a history of racially charged and homophobic comments, made his nomination particularly controversial.

But sources told CNN earlier Thursday that Clovis' nomination was imperiled over his connections to the ongoing Russia probe. The development is the latest sign that Justice Department special counsel Robert Mueller's probe into the Trump campaign and Russian collusion is impacting the day-to-day of Trump's administration, despite top White House aides -- including Trump himself -- claiming that the indictments of former top Trump campaign advisers Paul Manafort and Rick Gates had nothing to do with the administration or the campaign.

"The political climate inside Washington has made it impossible for me to receive balanced and fair consideration for this position," Clovis wrote in a letter addressed to Trump that was dated Wednesday. "The relentless assaults on you and your team seem to be a blood sport that only increases in intensity each day. As I am focused on your success and the success of this administration, I do not want to be a distraction or negative influence, particularly with so much important work left to do for the American people."

Clovis, who was already serving as the senior White House adviser on the Agriculture Department, added that he will "continue to serve at the pleasure of you and the secretary of agriculture." A USDA spokesperson confirmed Clovis will stay on in that capacity.

Questions are swirling over Clovis' relationship with George Papadopoulos -- the Trump campaign foreign policy adviser who has admitted to making a false statement to the FBI regarding his interactions with foreign officials close to the Russian government -- and a trip Papadopoulos took during the election where he met with a Russian figure.

The White House did not comment Wednesday night, and messages to Clovis' attorney regarding the latest developments in the Russia investigation were not returned.



Trump pick Sam Clovis blasted schools for 'indoctrinating' students with ideas like 'environmentalism' and 'racism'


Asked Monday if Trump was "still comfortable" with Clovis serving in the administration, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders responded, "I'm not aware of any change that would be necessary."

The Washington Post reported earlier this week that Clovis was one of the campaign officials referred to in court documents who Papadopoulos was emailing with. The FBI did not identify Clovis.

In the wake of the Post's report, Clovis' attorney said that inside the campaign, Clovis always "vigorously" opposed any Russian trip for Trump or staff. The attorney, Victoria Toensing, said in a statement that if a volunteer made a foreign policy suggestion, as a "polite gentleman from Iowa (he) would have expressed courtesy and appreciation."

She also said that Clovis would have had no authority to prohibit personal travel.

Sen. Debbie Stabenow, the ranking Democrat on the Senate agriculture committee, said court records released this week raised more questions over Clovis' nomination.



Who is George Papadopoulos?


"From early on, I have strongly opposed the nomination of Sam Clovis to be the chief scientist at USDA," she said in a statement.

"The emerging information about his role in the Trump campaign's interactions with Russia raises serious concerns. As we consider his nomination, I will be looking into these facts, along with his questionable qualifications and long history of divisive and outrageous statements."

Clovis, a former conservative radio talk show host in Iowa who was a frequent guest on CNN during the election, became an early supporter of Trump's two years ago. He quickly rose through the ranks of the campaign after Trump's strong finish in the Iowa caucuses, taking a national role in the organization as officials scrambled to build a campaign team.

Clovis, a novice to national presidential campaigns, was supervising Papadopoulos and became a visible spokesman for Trump on CNN and other networks.

A Republican official close to Clovis told CNN earlier Thursday that he remained loyal to Trump, adding that Clovis would not have fought the White House in backing away from his USDA nomination if asked.

"There's no way he would fight this or cause trouble for the White House," a Republican official and longtime associate of Clovis said.

Clovis' decision to step aside followed weeks of reports about incendiary comments he had previously made that had not disqualified him from the administration post.

Clovis previously argued that protections for LGBT people would lead to protections for pedophilia, and as a radio host and political activist, he promoted the hoax that former President Barack Obama was not born in the US. Likewise, he called Obama a "Maoist" and said Attorney General Eric Holder is a "racist black."

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/02/politi...ure/index.html

It's just as well, I don't think he would have been easily confirmed because he's not a scientist.

Do not understand trump's thinking on many of his choices for very important positions. If he continues on this path, he could risk not being reelected down the road.

Americans want safety, clean environment so our children do not need chemo or we die prematurely of cancer all so PROFITEERS can pollute and degradate.

We also do not want our great symbol of the American west to be killed off so polluting cattle ranchers can graze or toxic mining companies can profit at our expense on DESIGNATED LANDS FOR OUR WILD HORSES!

trump needs to come into a balance between profiteers and safety for American citizens and our creatures. He understands safety from untraceable illegals but he just can't seem to relate to money vs health or preservation of the precious wilderness areas of USA. He needs to step up to the plate.

trump & his profiteers will never be re-elected if they continue on the destructive paths of ignoramus candidates he continues to pick. This letter below from IDA is @ wild horses but there are many more issues - our ocean wildlife will be killed off or deafened to death with sonic testing for offshore drilling etc - many are on the brink of extinction. How extraordinarily selfish to eliminate species! Is nothing sacred save the profits of the rich?
Stop the Execution Order for Wild Horses and Burros

'On behalf of In Defense of Animals, I respectfully ask you to uphold the Congressional ban on killing healthy wild horses and burros and to oppose any language allowing unlimited sales of those held captive.
Moneyed interests that wish to control our public lands have long blamed wild equines for range degradation in order to shift attention away from decades of livestock overgrazing and damage caused by extractive industries. They are promoting the House version of the Interior budget which authorizes "humane euthanasia" of wild horses and burros in holding and those which the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) terms "excess" on the range without any scientific validation.
Their stated goal is to reduce equine herd population, through mass killing and/or mass removals, to 26,710. This target nearly equals the population estimate of 1971, a level so dangerously low that Congress unanimously passed the Wild Free-Roaming Horse and Burros Act to ensure their survival by protecting wild horse and burro herds in the areas where they were originally found.
Wild horses and burros inhabit a small fraction of public lands, while cows and sheep graze on the vast majority. The BLM has removed wild equines from 22 million acres historically designated for their use. It continues to round them up relentlessly. This failed policy causes population spikes. The costs for inhumane roundups and stockpiling account for the bulk of the Agency's wild horse and burro budget.
The House version of the Administration's budget request includes an amendment by Representative Chris Stewart that would amount to government-sponsored extinction.
If politicians with integrity don't act now, tens of thousands of wild horses and burros will pay with their lives for government mismanagement, and the cycle of waste, conflict and bloodshed will continue.
Advocates and animal welfare groups have proposed many cost-effective and humane options, including safe, reversible fertility control (as proposed by the National Academy of Sciences), support for public-private partnerships on the range, and cost-free alternatives to holding. However, the BLM has consistently opted for policies that cost taxpayers the most while benefiting private interests at every turn.
Please honor the overwhelming will of the American people and reject any language that authorizes killing, "euthanizing," or selling to slaughter these federally-protected animals. We want viable, humane solutions, not the extermination of our living cultural heritage. We insist on accountability, not slaughter under another name.'
http://Stop the Execution Order for ...ses and Burros