Thread: U.S. Rep. O'Rourke refutes latest ISIS in Mexico rumors, shows decades-long rumors

Yeah, well, you know, we're a nation of terrorist attacks, 3 in one day a few years back and no one knew about it, well, they did know but claimed we were safe and there were no "credible terrorist threats" in the US. And then there was that other one up there in Boston awhile back, and no one knew about it, well, they did know but claimed Boston was safe and there was no "credible terrorist threats" in the area.

So, as far as relying on the government when it comes to terrorist threats, when you miss 4 really big ones, then you really don't have any credibility when you claim "there are no ISIS camps" anywhere, because the bottom-line is you either don't know or know but are lying to US.; Either way, based on the track record, you're pretty useless when it comes to illegal aliens and terrorists, and should just sit down and shut-up.

Latest ‘ISIS Camp in Mexico’ Story is Completely FAKE

APRIL 17, 2015 BY 21WIRE 47 COMMENTS


J.R. Smith
21st Century Wire

There’s good money to be made in fake news.

Earlier this week on April 14th, a nameless ‘news story’ appeared on the “Corruption Chronicles Blog” section of the website Judicial Watch, which claimed “ISIS Camp a Few Miles from Texas, Mexican Authorities Confirm.” The website claims that ‘an ISIS base’ exists approximately 8 miles from the US-Texas border in an area known as ‘Anapra’ just west of Ciudad Juárez in the Mexican state of Chihuahua.

Upon closer inspection, it’s clear that this story is fake.

The following day, even FOX News distanced itself from the story, reporting that US law enforcement agencies flatly denied there was any truth at all to allegations that ISIS militants had set up a training base in Mexico. El Paso-based local news affiliate ABC-7 also contacted multiple federal border agencies. They all said the same thing: the report is unverified, and there is no ISIS in Anapra, or Juarez.

Today, the US State Department also weighed-in, calling the claims “unfounded”.

Read more @ http://21stcenturywire.com/2015/04/17/latest-isis-camp-in-mexico-story-is-completely-fake/

That's so funny, our national security protectors go to a town looking for ISIS, don't see any and then claim there aren't any because they didn't see them. Sounds like Bush and Tom Ridge on illegal aliens, "We don't know who they are, where they are or what they're doing".

What was fake on the Internet this week: Belle Gibson, ISIS in Mexico and insane weather news

. . . 2. ISIS is not operating a camp miles from the Mexican border.

Earlier this month, the conservative blog Judicial Watch — quoting, conveniently, some unnamed “Mexican sources” — claimed that the Islamic State had set up camp eight miles from El Paso in the Mexican state of Chihuahua. The story, which managed to name-drop a few other polarizing terms (the Bureau of Land Management, illegal border-crossers), quickly spread to other right-wing sites, including One News Now, American Thinker and the Washington Times.

Both national and local officials have repeatedly said, however, that’s there no evidence of an ISIS camp in Chihuahua. It’s probably worth noting that Judicial Watch was behind a similar ISIS-in-Mexico scare last fall, which Politifact ruled “mostly false.”

@ http://www.alipac.us/f19/todays-inte...55/index2.html

Yeah, this is exactly like Bush and Tom Ridge claiming they couldn't deport illegal aliens because they "don't know who they are, where they are or what they're doing" when 8 million of them were filing income tax returns every year under TINS and 71% of them are signed up for at least one form of welfare.

If the government officials said we investigated and couldn't see any when we went down there, but that doesn't mean they weren't there and have moved since the story broke or are concealing themselves so we can't find them, then the government could be somewhat credible. But to claim the story is "fake", or that Judicial Watch is an unreliable source with dishonest sources, THAT is just not credible at all.