Thread: DHS AGENT WITNESSED MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD INFILTRATION

DHS AGENT WITNESSED MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD INFILTRATION

'I did my utmost to warn my chain of command'

Published: 06/05/2016 at 3:34 PM

Obama senior adviser Valerie Jarrett at ISNA’s annual convention in 2009 (Photo credit: Vince Isner, ISNA)

By Paul Bremmer

The Islamic Society of North America was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation trial, in which the HLF was charged with providing material support to Hamas. Yet Valerie Jarrett, President Barack Obama’s senior adviser, addressed the ISNA annual convention in 2009, months after the trial exposed the Muslim Brotherhood front groups operating in the U.S.

The administration surely knew about ISNA’s radical ties, but they failed to disassociate themselves from the organization, noted recently retired Department of Homeland Security officer Philip Haney in an interview with nationally syndicated talk-host Laura Ingraham.

“They made a decision to move away from a law enforcement-based policy of counter-terrorism into what is now referred to as Countering Violent Extremism (CVE), which is based on an emphasis on civil rights and civil liberties,” Haney said Friday.

Ingraham called Haney’s new book about his decade as a DHS whistleblower, “See Something, Say Nothing,” a must-read “blockbuster.”
“His new book is just terrific,” she said told her listeners.

Not only did the Obama administration ignore the guilt of various individuals and organizations named in the Holy Land Foundation trial, they actually brought them into the administration to help form national security policy, Haney charged.

He said the best proof of this was in the CVE Steering Committee, created in the spring of 2010.

“At least six of the individuals on that steering committee were affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood,” Haney told Ingraham.

This cozying up to the Muslim Brotherhood came back to bite the administration in February 2015 when it scheduled a Countering Violent Extremism summit at the White House. In preparation for the summit, the administration had designated three U.S. Muslim communities – in Boston, Minneapolis and Los Angeles – as “model communities.”



Philip B. Haney



“A day or two before the pending CVE summit, the leaders of each one of these so-called ‘model communities’ came out and publicly renounced the program as being discriminatory, ineffective and stigmatizing,” Haney recalled.

“They completely separated themselves from the very program that they had helped initiate, and then a few months later they did it again in New York City.”

Undeterred, the Obama administration took the CVE program global, with a complete infrastructure based in Europe. Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced the program was going global at the U.N. in September 2015.

“However, [CVE] started within the Department of Homeland Security,” Haney said. “I saw all of it happen because I was active duty the whole time, and I did my utmost to warn my chain of command that these people are not our friends.”

Much of Haney’s work at DHS was focused on compiling information on individuals and groups affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood. He had input nearly 850 records into Customs and Border Protection’s electronic database.

In June 2009, Haney received a phone call from his superiors at the Port of Atlanta. They told him he would be ordered to remove the “linking information” from all of his Muslim Brotherhood-related files.

“That means the administration knowingly ordered me to remove information tied to the Muslim Brotherhood network after the evidence was presented in the Holy Land trial in November 2008,” Haney told Ingraham. “It wasn’t accidental, passive or even ignorant; they did it deliberately and intentionally.”
Ingraham was effusive in her praise of “See Something, Say Nothing.”

“This book has got to be read by you; you have to pick up this book,” Ingraham told her audience. “[Haney] saw it all from the inside, with the beginning of the apology tour, the Muslim Brotherhood infiltration and the refusal to say what this is – Islamic jihadism.”

See a trailer for “See Something, Say Nothing”: At Link.

http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/dhs-agent...-infiltration/

Shocking DHS Restrictions on Naming Our Enemies



Published on Jun 1, 2016
Order your copy of See Something, Say Nothing here: http://superstore.wnd.com/See-Somethi...

When recently retired DHS frontline officer and intelligence expert Philip Haney bravely tried to say something about the people and organizations that threatened the nation, his intelligence information was eliminated, and he was investigated by the very agency assigned to protect the country. The national campaign by the DHS to raise public awareness of terrorism and terrorism-related crime known as If You See Something, Say Something effectively has become If You See Something, Say Nothing.

In "See Something, Say Nothing," Haney – a charter member of DHS with previous experience in the Middle East – and co-author Art Moore expose just how deeply the submission, denial and deception run. Haney's insider, eyewitness account, supported by internal memos and documents, exposes a federal government capitulating to an enemy within and punishing those who reject its narrative.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uJ-v8kp9SM

There is just something so sinister, underhanded, treasonous @ USA admins and EU involved with all this muslim stuff - to the point that a muslim takeover is evident in EU and they have been working on it in the USA.

Globalist agenda it would seem - muslims at Bilderberg meeting too, muslim mayor of Rotterdam for one. There was info on the web of 3 major Dutch cities have banned dog walking so not to offend the schizo muslims but articles seem to have been scrubbed off the web. Only recent story found is from 2012 @ requests also in Spain, taxis in Britain will not pick up blind people with guide dogs. Definitely the wrong direction for the leading civilized countries of the world.

1 reference from 2012, off topic but one instance of the takeover aside from the rapes, robberies etc & this is prior to the current multitude of muslims spread to western countries:
Muslims Declare Jihad on Dogs in Europe

by Soeren Kern
January 31, 2012 at 5:00 am

A Dutch Muslim politician has called for a ban on dogs in The Hague, the third-largest city in the Netherlands.

Islamic legal tradition holds that dogs are "unclean" animals, and some say the call to ban them in Holland and elsewhere represents an attempted encroachment of Islamic Sharia law in Europe.

This latest canine controversy -- which the Dutch public has greeted with a mix of amusement and outrage -- follows dozens of other Muslim-vs-dog-related incidents in Europe. Critics say it reflects the growing assertiveness of Muslims in Europe as they attempt to impose Islamic legal and religious norms on European society.

The Dutch dustup erupted after Hasan Küçük, a Turkish-Dutch representative on The Hague city council for the Islam Democrats, vehemently opposed a proposal by the Party for the Animals (Partij voor de Dieren) to make the city more dog friendly.

According to a January 28 report in the Amsterdam-based newspaper De Telegraaf, Küçük counter-argued that keeping dogs as pets is tantamount to animal abuse and he then called for the possession of dogs in The Hague to be criminalized.

According to its website, the Islam Democrats [ID] party is "founded on the Islamic principles of justice, equality and solidarity. ID is a bottom-up response to the large gap between the Muslim and immigrant communities and local politics…ID focuses on the political awareness within the Muslim and immigrant communities. Awareness about the need to organize, but also the need for mutual support."

Paul ter Linden, who represents the Dutch Freedom Party (PVV) on The Hague city council, responded to Küçük by saying: "In this country pet ownership is legal. Whoever disagrees with this should move to another country."

Dutch political commentators believe Küçük's declarations are a provocation designed to stir up the Muslim population in The Hague. Muslims -- who now make up more than 12% of the city's population of 500,000 -- view dogs as ritually unclean animals and Küçük's call for a ban on them is a sure vote-getter, they say.

The incident in Holland follows dog-related controversies in other European countries.

In Spain, two Islamic groups based in Lérida -- a city in the northeastern region of Catalonia where 29,000 Muslims now make up around 20% of the city's total population -- asked local officials to regulate the presence of dogs in public spaces so they do not "offend Muslims."

Muslims demanded that dogs be banned from all forms of public transportation including all city buses as well as from all areas frequented by Muslim immigrants. Muslims said the presence of dogs in Lérida violates their religious freedom and their right to live according to Islamic principles.

After the municipality refused to acquiesce to Muslim demands, the city experienced a wave of dog poisonings. More than a dozen dogs were poisoned in September 2011 (local media reports here, here, here, here and here) in Lérida's working class neighborhoods of Cappont and La Bordeta, districts that are heavily populated by Muslim immigrants and where many dogs have been killed over the past several years.

Local residents taking their dogs for walks say they have been harassed by Muslim immigrants who are opposed to seeing the animals in public. Muslims have also launched a number of anti-dog campaigns on Islamic websites and blogs based in Spain.

In Britain, which has become "ground zero" for Europe's canine controversies, blind passengers are being ordered off buses or refused taxi rides because Muslim drivers or passengers object to their "unclean" guide dogs.

In Reading, for example, one pensioner, a cancer sufferer, was repeatedly confronted by drivers and asked to get off the bus because of his guide dog. He also faced hostility at a hospital and in a supermarket over the animal.

In Nottingham, a Muslim taxi driver refused to carry a blind man because he was accompanied by his guide dog. The taxi driver was later fined £300 ($470).

In Stafford, a Muslim taxi driver refused to carry an elderly blind couple from a grocery store because they were accompanied by their seeing-eye dog.

In Tunbridge Wells, Kent, a blind man was turned away from an Indian restaurant because the owner said it was against his Muslim beliefs to allow dogs into his establishment.

In London, a bus driver prevented a woman from boarding a bus with her dog because there was a Muslim lady on the bus who "might be upset by the dog." As the woman attempted to complain, the doors closed and the bus drove away. When a second bus arrived, she again tried to embark, but was stopped again, this time because the driver said he was Muslim.

Also in Britain, police sniffer dogs trained to spot terrorists at train stations may no longer come into contact with Muslim passengers, following complaints that it was offensive to their religion.

A report for the Transport Department advised that the animals should only touch passengers' luggage because it is considered "more acceptable." British Transport Police still use sniffer dogs -- which are trained to detect explosives -- with any passengers regardless of faith, but handlers are now more aware of "cultural sensitivities."

Sniffer dogs used by police to search mosques and Muslim homes are now being fitted with leather bootees to cover their paws so that they do not cause offense.

Critics say the complaints are just another example of Muslims trying to force their rules and morals on British society. Tory MP Philip Davies said: "As far as I am concerned, everyone should be treated equally in the face of the law and we cannot have people of different religious groups laying the law down. I hope the police will go about their business as they would do normally."

Meanwhile, Muslim prisoners in Britain are being given fresh clothes and bedding after sniffer dogs search their cells.

The inmates say their bedclothes and prison uniforms must be changed according to Islamic law if they have come anywhere near dog saliva. Government rules mean prison wardens must hand out replacement sets after random drug searches to avoid religious discrimination claims.

The dogs have also been banned from touching copies of the Islamic holy book the Koran and other religious items. Prisoners are handed special bags to protect the articles.

In Scotland, the Tayside Police Department apologized for featuring a German shepherd puppy as part of a campaign to publicize its new non-emergency telephone number. The postcards are potentially offensive to the city's 3,000-strong Muslim community.

In Norway, Gry Berg, a blind woman, was denied entry into four taxis in the center of Oslo because she was accompanied by her guide dog.

In France, Marie Laforêt, one of the country's most well-known singers and actresses, appeared in a Paris courtroom in December to defend herself against charges that a job advertisement she placed discriminated against Muslims.

The 72-year-old Laforêt had placed an ad on an Internet website looking for someone to do some work on her terrace in 2009. She specified in the ad that "people with allergies or orthodox Muslims" should not apply "due to a small Chihuahua."

Laforêt claimed that she made the stipulation because she believed the Muslim faith saw dogs as unclean.

The case was taken up by an anti-discrimination group called the Movement against Racism and for Friendship between Peoples (MRAP), which lodged a complaint against Laforêt.

Laforêt's lawyer said his client "knew that the presence of a dog could conflict with the religious convictions of orthodox Muslims. It was a sign of respect." But Muslims rejected her defense.

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/27...an-dogs-europe

WOW...no words, so sick of these people. Send them ALL back, they do not belong in Western countries.

They are so strange. They hate pork, dogs, women, gays, America, western values, western society, US law, Christians, blacks, etc., etc., etc. They are full of hate, racism, bigotry, xenophobia, misogyny and sociopathy. This does not apply to all Muslims, American Muslims whose families have been in our country for generations do not hold all these same views. There are Black Muslims who hold few if any of these views. Yet the foreign Muslims who come here from Muslim-political countries do and as we saw in the Orlrando shooting, raise their children with the same hate, racism, chauvinism and bigotry they hold from their home country. As Trump said, if Omar Mateen's parents hadn't been allowed into the United States, Omar wouldn't have been here trying to murder over 100 innocent people in Orlando. And he's absolutely right.

Time to stop the insanity.

We need an immediate 10 to 20 Year Moratorium on All Immigration

Hillary’s State Dept. DELETED Records That Could Have Stopped Orlando Attack

Ben Marquis on June 13, 2016 at 11:41am

Following the tragic terrorist shooting attack in San Bernardino in December, it was revealed by a former Department of Homeland Security agent that he had been running a special investigation that potentially could have prevented that attack from taking place.

Now, following the even more deadly mass shooting terrorist assault on a nightclub in Orlando, Florida, that same agent is suggesting that his investigation could have prevented that attack from occurring as well.

According to WND, retired DHS agent Philip Haney had been running a special investigation into a worldwide Islamist movement originating from Pakistan known as Tablighi Jamaat. In the course of his investigation, Haney uncovered numerous connections between several mosques and individuals in the U.S. with known terrorists and terrorist organizations, including Al Qaida and Hamas, among others.

Unortunately, just as Haney’s investigation was really ramping up, it was shut down in a joint effort by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s State Department and the Civil Rights division of DHS, due to “concern” that the investigation was unfairly targeting Muslims.

Making matters worse, much of the important information and links Haney had documented were summarily deleted in 2012.

Had the investigation not been halted, and the information deleted, there’s no telling what radical Islamic mayhem could have been prevented — including, possibly, the San Bernardino and Orlando attacks.

What couldn’t be deleted was the information remaining in Haney’s mind, and following the attack in Orlando and the revelation of the mosque the shooter attended. Haney knew the mosque was familiar, and did some digging. He quickly determined that the gunman’s mosque, the Islamic Center of Fort Pierce, was part of the network he had uncovered five years ago.

“This case struck me as very similar to the San Bernardino shooting case,” Haney said. “I suspected that they were both part of a national and international network of organizations.”

Using only open-source material, Haney was able to reestablish the connections he first discovered years ago in the span of only a few hours. That left him critical of the FBI’s efforts at previously investigating the Orlando jihadist.

“It means they didn’t go through the same basic, analytical process that I went through over a three- or four-hour period in which I was able to link the mosque to my previous cases,” he said.

Sadly, because of the prevailing PC culture and desire to avoid offending radical Muslims that runs rampant through President Barack Obama’s administration, an investigation that could have led to a shut down of radical mosques and the arrest of real and potential terrorists was ended before it could do any good.

http://conservativetribune.com/hilla...rlando-attack/