Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012

    Clinton Email Exposes Liberal Non-Profit’s Partisan Campaign Work

    Clinton Email Exposes Liberal Non-Profit’s Partisan Campaign Work


    MARK TAPSCOTT
    10:09 PM 12/10/2015

    Tax-exempt non-profit foundations are “absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in” partisan campaigns, but that didn’t prevent Center for American Progress President Neera Tanden from helping President Obama and his Democratic allies in the 2010 election.

    Tanden – who was CAP’s chief executive officer at the time – was responding to a Sept. 7, 2010, email from then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asking “do you and CAP have any ideas as to how to change the dynamic before it’s too late? Losing the House would be a disaster in every way.”

    John Podesta, Clinton’s 2016 national campaign manager and White House chief of staff under President Clinton, was the founding president of CAP and was there at the time of the Clinton-Neera email exchange about how to rescue Democratic campaigns from electoral disaster five years ago.

    Clinton hit the send button at 7:06 a.m. that day. Tanden responded at length at 11:15 p.m. that night, according to copies of the exchange recently made public by the State Department. Clinton and Tanden go way back, with the latter serving in the former’s 2008 presidential bid.


    “On whither the Democrats, well, that is a long email or even a memo,” Tanden said. “A few things – as it stands now, we could well lose the Senate, not just the House … CAP is doing its own polling and focus groups on economic messages, so I’ll have more to report soon if you’re interested.”

    Tanden continued, saying that in April of 2010, “she went told the [White House] folks to get a core economic contrast, and create a contrast with the [Republicans] for the seven months that was then left till November.”

    She pointed, among others, to Wisconsin Democrat Sen. Bruce Feingold’s ultimately unsuccessful bid for re-election and Oregon Democrat Sen. Patty Murray, who was re-elected, as campaigns that needed help.

    Among the White House “folks” Tanden advised was the President, who she said she talked “directly to … and they did try for a little bit, but then it didn’t really take Mold.” (Apparently, Tanden intended to type “Hold.”)

    Optimism was not in Tanden’s assessment as she observed that “we also said to show that he was working relentlessly on the jobs problem, he had to do economic events almost every day. But they were focused on financial regulation (though they never tied that to job security) and then the BP oil spill … and now it’s a little late.”

    Tanden’s email concluded by saying “I’m not sure that this would have closed a 10-point gap, but we think it would have helped.”

    In the event, the 2010 election proved to be the disaster Clinton predicted, with Republicans regaining control of the House of Representatives, electing new senators and governors in key states and boosting the party’s state legislative seat total to heights not seen since Calvin Coolidge was in the White House.

    The federal tax code is clear in prohibiting non-profit executives like Tanden from giving partisan political advice to candidates or political parties.

    “Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office,” according to the IRS.

    “Contributions to political campaign funds or public statements of position (verbal or written) made on behalf of the organization in favor of or in opposition to any candidate for public office clearly violate the prohibition against political campaign activity. Violating this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes.”

    Tanden may also have exposed a prohibited activity involving others at her think tank in her offer to Clinton to make available for campaign purposes CAP’s “own polling and focus groups on economic messages …”

    On its web site, Tanden claims its purpose is to “develop new policy ideas, challenge the media to cover the issues that truly matter, and shape the national debate. With policy teams in major issue areas, CAP can think creatively at the cross-section of traditional boundaries to develop ideas for policymakers that lead to real change. By employing an extensive communications and outreach effort that we adapt to a rapidly changing media landscape, we move our ideas aggressively in the national policy debate.”

    Sharing for partisan political purposes the results of polls and focus groups meant to help develop and market policy ideas an proposals seems problematic in view of the clear prohibitions in the federal tax code.

    Tanden could not be reached for comment.

    The email exchange may also pose new problems for Clinton in her campaign for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination.

    The Hatch Act’s prohibition of partisan political activities by federal employees is partially waived in the case of the Secretary of State and certain other presidentially appointed and Senate-confirmed officials.

    But the Secretary of State is still barred from using “his official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election; knowingly solicit, accept, or receive a political contribution from any person …,” according to the Office of Special Counsel, which is responsible for investigating allegations of Hatch Act violations.

    The Sept. 7, 2010, email includes both Clinton seeking advice on how to affect the results of the 2010 congressional elections and soliciting such advice from another individual.
    A Clinton spokesman could not be reached for comment.

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/12/10/re...#ixzz3tyrw1aw0


  2. #2
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    Yes, and I've been telling you all for years now that the only way to stop this 501 C 3 tax fraud "charity" crap that's robbing our treasuries, changing our political system, and bankrupting our country is to pass the FairTax which for all practical purposes puts all these tax fraud scams and shams out of business the day HR 25 is signed into law.

    FairTax Act of 2015: HR 25 in the US House of Representatives and S 155 in the US Senate.

    Make it happen. Save our nation.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. Kids For Cash Scheme Exposes Horrors of For-Profit Prisons: Documentary
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-08-2014, 05:33 PM
  2. McCain-Obama Alliance Exposes The Partisan Charade
    By kathyet in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-21-2013, 02:54 PM
  3. Mark Levin Exposes Liberal Front Group Americans for a Conservative Direction
    By ALIPAC in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-07-2013, 03:04 PM
  4. CBS Exposes Hillary Clinton Bosnia Trip.
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-25-2008, 10:16 PM
  5. Dobbs: Campaign a lot of partisan nonsense
    By zeezil in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-16-2008, 05:09 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •