Results 1 to 3 of 3
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: White House details ‘destructive’ spending cuts

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member florgal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,386

    White House details ‘destructive’ spending cuts

    White House details ‘destructive’ spending cuts

    By Stephen Dinan
    Updated: 2:06 p.m. on Friday, September 14, 2012


    With excruciating detail, the White House on Friday laid out exactly where it will have to cut $109 billion from federal spending in January, including $11.1 billion from Medicare and $54.7 billion from defense spending.


    The defense cuts include more than $15 billion from the Army, Navy and Air Force operations and maintenance accounts.


    “The report leaves no question that the sequestration would be deeply destructive to national security, domestic investments, and core government functions,” the White House said in the report.
    Everything from fencing and technology along the U.S.-Mexico border to the government’s own internal watchdogs to local environmental programs are also on the chopping block.


    The cuts fall particularly heavy on the federal civilian workforce, where staffing levels and salaries would be docked more than 8 percent almost across the board.


    Also facing slashes are the National Institutes of Health, which would see a $2.5 billion cut, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which would have to trim $464 million, according to the 394-page report.


    The cuts are due under the terms of last year’s debt deal, which set up the automatic “sequesters” in exchange for granting the administration the borrowing authority to go deeper into debt. Last year’s deficit super committee was supposed to come up with replacements for the sequesters, but the bipartisan committee failed, leaving the automatic cuts in place. They take effect Jan. 2.


    In the report, the White House’s budget office took pains to say it didn’t have any discretion, and that it didn’t support the cuts.


    “The percentage cuts in this report, and the identification of exempt and non-exempt accounts, reflect the requirements of the laws that the administration is applying,” the report said. “With the single exception of military personnel accounts, the administration cannot choose which pro- grams to exempt, or what percentage cuts to apply.”


    Administration officials said the numbers are preliminary, and will be updated based on 2013 spending levels that Congress is working on this month.


    The White House specifically exempted military personnel, but other parts of the Pentagon were not, and will see a nearly 10 percent cut. The Army is slated to lose nearly $7 billion in operations and maintenance funding, and the Navy and Air Force will lose another $4.3 billion each in operations money.


    Meanwhile Howard University, an historically black institution in the District of Columbia, would lose $19 million.


    Friday’s report was required under a law Congress passed over the summer.

  2. #2
    Senior Member 4thHorseman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Gulf Coast
    Posts
    1,003
    With excruciating detail, the White House on Friday laid out exactly where it will have to cut $109 billion from federal spending in January, including $11.1 billion from Medicare and $54.7 billion from defense spending.
    Politics as usual. Reminds me of the Carter cuts in 1978. Of course they could save upwards of 100 billion dollars a year without any cuts simply by enforcing ALL immigration laws and ensuring no illegal alien receives any social services support. They could also scale back the massive expansion of the IRS to support Obamacare. And they definitely could cut off all federal funds to so-called non-profit organizations, such as Planned Parenthood, La Raza, Endowment for the Arts, ACORN (or whatever pseudonym they go by today), NPR, etcBut they won't. Their direction is plain. The military operations cuts are already taking place. This is probably why they are not giving Marines assigned to the Egyptian embassy any live ammunition. Oh well, they have to start somewhere I guess. But I bet the Secret Service agents assigned to the WH have live ammunition. No cuts there, no sirree bob.
    "We have met the enemy, and they is us." - POGO

  3. #3
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012
    Foreign Aid to the Middle East.
    Congressional PDF on Foreign Aid to the Middle East
    http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/mideast/RL32260.pdf

    See Also
    http://www.alipac.us/f19/white-house...gn-aid-263974/
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •