Thread: Another U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Goes Against Illegals!!!

By John W. Lillpop


The U.S. Supreme Court appears to be on a "common sense, rule of law" roll which is good news for American citizens, not so good for illegal aliens and Democrats who hate rule of law.

As reported at the reference, in part:


It appears that last month’s Supreme Court ruling upholding Arizona’s E-Verify law will precipitate a potent counteroffensive against the illegal immigration judicial defense industry.

In light of the Court’s 5-3 decision validating the right of state and local governments to impose penalties on employers who hire illegal aliens, the high court vitiated a ruling against a similar ordinance passed by government officials in Hazleton, Pennsylvania.

In 2006, following a sharp spike in violent crime perpetrated by illegal aliens, Mayor Lou Barletta (now a Republican congressman) signed an ordinance prohibiting landlords from renting to illegals and employers from hiring them. Under the Hazleton Immigration Relief Act, renters and employers who failed to verify the immigration status of renters and employees would face fines or suspension of business and rental licenses. This law was the impetus for dozens of subsequent efforts by states and municipalities to curb their growing illegal immigration problem.

Today’s ruling is a very salient victory for supporters of our sovereignty and the rule of law. Hazleton was one of the earlier battlegrounds in the fight against illegal immigration and has inspired many other local governments to complete the job that the federal government refuses to do.â€

YEAH!

Wonderful ruling. Bet you Sotomayor was on the opposing side (Reconquista Queen). I remember a quote from moderate swing voter Justice Kennedy stating he would not leave the Bench as long as Obama is in office which gave us a possible insight as to how he would vote on most social issues. Be prepared for violence as the pro open borders, anti Constitution and anti America crowd invokes whenever they lose.

Originally Posted by retiredairforce

Wonderful ruling. Bet you Sotomayor was on the opposing side (Reconquista Queen). I remember a quote from moderate swing voter Justice Kennedy stating he would not leave the Bench as long as Obama is in office which gave us a possible insight as to how he would vote on most social issues. Be prepared for violence as the pro open borders, anti Constitution and anti America crowd invokes whenever they lose.

The writing is on the wall.But alot of people wont believe it until they are in the middle of a war!

Why the hell does the SCOTUS need to rule on excluding businesses operating in violation of federal law? Glad they still have some common sense.

Least now we have the power for mandatory E-Verify and penalties if any area wants it. If we can get control of semi major cities with a decent mayor we can get it in that way. Just think how much damage we could do to the illegal alien push of them wanting rights if we can get mayors in 10 key major cities such as Chicago, NYC, LA, Minneapolis, and whatever other major ones and shove mandatory e-verify in.

Our next problem however with E-Verify likely will be the liberals trying to dismantle E-Verify itself through funding or making it useless through bad regulations. Instead however we need to push for the SSA to join in with E-Verify to check SSN's who have multiple jobs especially in multiple areas.

NEED HELP HERE! PLEASE CALL NC LEGISLATURE TODAY!

http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-240180.html

Originally Posted by working4change

NEED HELP HERE! PLEASE CALL NC LEGISLATURE TODAY!

http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-240180.html

ON IT MAN!!!!

Originally Posted by duckman

Originally Posted by working4change

NEED HELP HERE! PLEASE CALL NC LEGISLATURE TODAY!

http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-240180.html

ON IT MAN!!!!

Thanks for your help