Thread: Why Donald Trump May Still Face a Delegate Mutiny at the Convention

Why Donald Trump May Still Face a Delegate Mutiny at the Convention

• By ALANA ABRAMSON
• KATHERINE FAULDERS

Jun 17, 2016, 3:35 PM ET

Ron Jenkins/Getty Images

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks to supporters on June 16, 2016 at Gilley's in Dallas.The efforts to stop Donald Trump from securing the nomination at the Republican National Convention are heating up, with nearly three dozen delegates dialing into a conference call yesterday to discuss coordinating methods to block his coronation in Cleveland.

The conference call, titled "free the delegates," was led by Kendal Unruh, a Colorado delegate and a member of the GOP's rules committee, which shapes the rules of the convention. Unruh, who is pledged to Ted Cruz, wants to create a rule enabling delegates to abstain from voting for Trump, even if they are bound to him, if they feel it violates their moral or religious beliefs.

According to participants, there were approximately 30 people representing 15 states on the nearly hour-long phone call. According to one call participant, the focus was on coordinating the multi-state effort, and less on the official plan of action, which is in the works. News of the call was first reported by the Washington Post. Another phone call is scheduled for Sunday night.

"This call will introduce us to each other in preparation for an open “national leadership” call in a few days," the invitation, a copy of which was obtained by ABC News, explains.

Out of the conference call came a centralized method of managing the data, and talks to create a website explaining the mission, Unruh said.

The idea is to coalesce behind a plan to stop Trump and not unite behind a particular person, though many are former Cruz supporters.

Even if Unruh has managed to develop grassroots support for this idea, however, it is still an uphill climb for this to actually happen.

A conscience clause can only be implemented if it is approved by a majority of the rules committee. And even if the rules committee approves it, it still needs to be approved by a majority of the delegates on the convention floor.

According to current rules, delegates are bound to vote for the candidate they are pledged to -- which is based on primary and caucus votes. Trump has garnered 1,543 delegates, according to ABC News' most recent estimate, more than the 1,237 needed to clinch the nomination outright.

Also under current rules, if a candidate does not receive more than half of the delegates on the first ballot, some are released on the second ballot to vote for whomever they want.

Efforts to stop Trump have focused on fomenting dissent among delegates pledged to the real estate mogul or putting delegates in place who would not vote for Trump on subsequent ballots.

The group claims that more than half the delegates who will be at the convention in July do not want Trump as president or the candidate for the Republican Party. But Unruh says she was the only member of the rules committee on the call last night. And other members of the committee have told ABC News they aren’t on board.

“Donald Trump won it fair and square,” Cindy Costa, a delegate from South Carolina who is also serving on the rules committee, said last week. An unbinding rule is not only unrealistic and unfair, she said, but would cause “magnificent chaos.”

Kelly Arnold, chairman of the Kansas Republican Party and another member of the rules committee, told ABC News last week he is going to do “what’s in the best interest” of the GOP.

"I don’t see myself making any drastic changes," he said.

Trump released a statement calling the effort “totally illegal.”

"I won almost 14 million votes, which is by far more votes than any candidate in the history of the Republican primaries,” Trump’s statement read. “I have tremendous support and get the biggest crowds by far and any such move would not only be totally illegal but also a rebuke of the millions of people who feel so strongly about what I am saying. People that I defeated soundly in the primaries will do anything to get a second shot -- but there is no mechanism for it to happen.”

The RNC did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donal...ry?id=39940520

A conscience clause can only be implemented if it is approved by a majority of the rules committee. And even if the rules committee approves it, it still needs to be approved by a majority of the delegates on the convention floor.

Start taking names and kicking butt. These are the same people flapping their gums about "conscience" who have been in the system in DC to run up $20 Trillion of national debt, embroil US in 4 wars on lies and misinformation, flooded our country with at least 30 million illegal aliens sucking US dry as a bone, and shipped over 45% of our manufacturing base and tens of millions of good jobs to other countries through free trade treason.

For this bunch of traitors to think they could ever use a "conscience" clause at a convention to over-turn the outcome of a primary election where the winner won more votes than any Republican primary candidate in the history of the United States just shows their pathetic desperation, bad inbreeding, and/or genetic mental defects.

This is nothing but blatant wicked evil persecution of Trump and Trump Supporters.

This country is facing grave economic threats. We have been the go-to 'problem solver' for the world. Us and Europe. There are hundreds of countries these refugees could go to---but they pick a handful...thanks to the UN and associated activists. I would like to see any of the other GOP members who weigh in on such issues, to actually say something about it.Trump is the only one, in the running, who addresses it.

Of course, people who think only of their own economic advantage may think that an unrestricted population growth is helping them. It's not going to help nearly everyone, though.

Populating beyond your means to sustain whether through breeding or immigration is overpopulation, and all species know that this is ultimately the end of the species as we knew it.