Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member WhatMattersMost's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Illegal Sanctuary, Illinois
    Posts
    2,494

    $66 Million to Improve Sewerage Treatment from Tijuana River

    Border sewage facility funded

    Issues of location and builder remain
    By Mike Lee
    UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

    December 19, 2007

    Congress last night set aside up to $66 million to improve treatment of sewage from the Tijuana River. But the long-awaited funding didn't settle questions about where the facility that would handle the wastewater should be built and who should build it.


    Advertisement Instead, the legislation directs the International Boundary and Water Commission to report back to Congress after analyzing the two leading sewage treatment plans. It allows the commission to choose the best option, and that probably won't happen for at least four months.
    The money is the most tangible sign yet that the U.S. government will upgrade its wastewater treatment plant in San Ysidro or pay for a separate plant in Tijuana that has been proposed by Bajagua LLC of San Marcos.

    The facility in San Ysidro handles about 25 million gallons of wastewater a day from Tijuana, but it hasn't met U.S. Clean Water Act standards since it started operating in the late 1990s.

    One complication is that $66 million would pay for only about two-thirds of the San Ysidro expansion.

    Bajagua officials have said their plant would treat at least 59 million gallons of wastewater a day. They would finance the construction costs upfront, but U.S. taxpayers ultimately would pay for the facility and its operation over two decades. The bill is estimated at $600 million.


    Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., has said for months that expanding the plant in San Ysidro is the surest way to lessen sewage problems in the South Bay. However, the spending bill directs the boundary commission to negotiate with Bajagua while it evaluates the best path.

    [b]“The compromise demonstrates that the federal government is committed to cleaning up the Tijuana River and that we will move forward with funding to build a new treatment facility,â€
    It's Time to Rescind the 14th Amendment

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Couer D Alene Id.
    Posts
    438
    Waste water from Mexico well why not we have the people coming here that Mexico doesnt want ..

  3. #3
    Senior Member CitizenJustice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    2,314
    "“We tried and tried to keep (the money) out,â€

  4. #4
    Senior Member SOSADFORUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    IDAHO
    Posts
    19,570
    And again the U.S. Taxpayer pays, why does this not surprise me and who the hell let Fienstein in on it...that was a sure way to screw the American taxpayer.....What the hell, we just gave Mexico 1.4 billion to fight their drug cartel, and they are still whinning, because they don't want restrictions on the money.
    Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Tri-State Area IA, MN & SD
    Posts
    650
    My dad's suggestion - build a canal DEEP & WIDE from the Pacific to the Gulf of Mexico and build in systems for using the water. It could be the sister to the Panama Canal providing a load full of opportunity from the production of electricity to irrigation on both sides of the border.
    From the Border Movie:

    I will not sell my country out ~ I WILL NOT!
    I'd like to see that pride back in AMERICA!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •