Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member American-ized's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Monroe County, New York
    Posts
    3,530

    New Mexican consul says U.S. influx is bad for Mexico, too

    New Mexican consul says U.S. influx is bad for Mexico, too

    Sacramento Bee
    By Stephen Magagnini
    smagagnini@sacbee.com
    Sunday, Oct. 4, 2009 - 12:00 am | Page 5B

    The Mexican government has sent one of its top experts on Mexican migration to Sacramento to dispel myths about the estimated 7 million undocumented Mexicans in the United States.

    That emigration "is very bad business for Mexico - we are losing our young labor force," said the new consul general of Mexico in Sacramento, Carlos González Gutiérrez. "Whole villages are becoming ghost towns."

    Instead of staying in Mexico to create wealth, the workers are coming to the United States to create wealth, González Gutiérrez said. "It's not the U.S. subsidizing Mexico - it's the other way around. The only solution is to create better jobs in Mexico."

    González Gutiérrez, 45, became consul general in Sacramento in May. He and his staff of 30 serve 800,000 immigrants from Modesto to the Oregon border.

    The consulate offers IDs to Mexican immigrants so they can open bank accounts. It also helps people locate relatives, deal with legal problems and find health care.

    González Gutiérrez studied Mexican migration for six years while serving as executive director of the Institute for Mexicans Abroad - about 12 million worldwide, most of them in the United States.

    González Gutiérrez understands the fear and distrust of undocumented immigrants.

    "I see in Mexico exactly the same reaction" to Central Americans, Koreans and others. "It's part of the human condition. You become concerned when you see a massive inflow of immigrants."

    But sending all the undocumented workers back to Mexico would create more problems for the United States, he said, collapsing the economy and disrupting families.

    "They are part of binational families - many have children and spouses who are U.S. citizens."

    The immigration debate in the United States "has nothing to do with reality," González Gutiérrez said.

    Not only are millions of undocumented workers binational, but some of California's key industries - agriculture, construction, restaurants and hotels - depend on them. "To pull the plug on foreign labor is to hurt yourself," he said.

    The undocumented workers were essentially "invited here by employers who could not fulfill these jobs otherwise - more than 80 percent of California's farmworkers are immigrants," González Gutiérrez said.

    "They come because of the huge income gap - the average Mexican worker makes about $10,000 a year, while the median income for Mexicans 16 years and older in the U.S. is $20,238."

    Undocumented workers pay sales taxes and many pay income taxes through their employers, he said.

    They will pay more taxes, complete their educations and contribute more to California if they are given work permits that allow them to go back and forth, he said.

    The cost of undocumented immigrants "is huge on both sides of the border," González Gutiérrez said.

    Along with laborers, half a million Mexican university graduates are living in America, "and we need these people in Mexico," González Gutiérrez said.

    While critics of immigration policy change often accuse the Mexican government of inefficiency and corruption, González Gutiérrez said, even if Mexico's economy grew at a record 7 percent a year, the income gap would still pull migrants to the United States for decades to come.

    Regardless, Mexican migration has dropped 50 percent over the past several years because of the recession, González Gutiérrez said.

    González Gutiérrez said his job is to promote investment and job creation in Mexico, and to protect and empower Mexicans here and help them integrate into U.S. society.

    Their success is key to Mexico's success. "They are one of the most powerful sources for change we have because they want to make Mexico more democratic and more open," González Gutiérrez said.

    http://www.sacbee.com/ourregion/story/2229189.html

  2. #2
    Senior Member ReggieMay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,527
    The Mexican government has sent one of its top experts on Mexican migration to Sacramento to dispel myths about the estimated 7 million undocumented Mexicans in the United States.
    7 million? Who are they kidding? Unless he's leaving out the one who have documents - just not their own.

    "It's not the U.S. subsidizing Mexico - it's the other way around. "
    Remittances are a major source of revenue for Mexico.
    "A Nation of sheep will beget a government of Wolves" -Edward R. Murrow

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    ELE
    ELE is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    5,660
    Oh my! We better help Mexico and send all of their people back to their own country asap. smile
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member SOSADFORUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    IDAHO
    Posts
    19,570
    You are full of crap González Gutiérrez...I say we send them home and find out the hard way, something tells me these jobs will be filled by out of work Americans!

    CLOSE OUR BORDERS!!!
    Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    Senior Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    5,262
    If their government and our organiztions started a dialogue we would find areas of common ground. It is our politicians acting for the US Chamber of Commerce and Mexican American organizations and fellow travellers which are our biggest foes. Attrition through enforcement is really the best solution and in counter response to the DREAM Act the best Marshall Plan.
    I support enforcement and see its lack as bad for the 3rd World as well. Remittances are now mostly spent on consumption not production assets. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  6. #6
    Senior Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    5,262
    "They come because of the huge income gap - the average Mexican worker makes about $10,000 a year, while the median income for Mexicans 16 years and older in the U.S. is $20,238."

    This should read

    "They come because of the huge income gap - the average Mexican worker household makes about $10,000 a year, while the median income for Mexicans 16 years and older in the U.S. is $20,238."
    I support enforcement and see its lack as bad for the 3rd World as well. Remittances are now mostly spent on consumption not production assets. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  7. #7
    Senior Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    5,262
    If they want things to change binational families need to invest in Mexico rather allowing the remittances to be used as spending money and financing illegal immigration.
    I support enforcement and see its lack as bad for the 3rd World as well. Remittances are now mostly spent on consumption not production assets. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  8. #8
    Senior Member GaPatriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    879
    The problem for Mexico is when their nationals come back to Mexico, our economy improves and theirs will take a nosedive. Which will only serve to reinforce the obvious, which we have been complaining about for years now.

    Mexico last month had an unemployment rate of 4.8%. There is no excuse for delaying massive deportations except that corrupt and immoral politicians, corporations and special interest groups demand that our taxpayers support and subsidize this ungrateful and arrogant labor force that is a detriment on our nation and a drain on our resources.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    5,262
    If they want things to change binational families need to invest in Mexico rather allowing the remittances to be used as spending money and financing illegal immigration.
    That would be the case if the Mexican illegal aliens all left at once and their families here and in Mexico did not invest in job creation in Mexico.
    I support enforcement and see its lack as bad for the 3rd World as well. Remittances are now mostly spent on consumption not production assets. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  10. #10
    Senior Member Ratbstard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Alien City-(formerly New York City)
    Posts
    12,611
    But sending all the undocumented workers back to Mexico would create more problems for the United States, he said, collapsing the economy and disrupting families.
    I Call BS!
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •