Thread: Gerrymandering for illegals-creating majority voters in AR

ArkansasFreedom
Joe McCutchen

Gerrymandering for legal & illegal Mexicans is creating a Hispanic majority district in NW Arkansas

Representative Charlie Collins July 9, 2011
Representative Collins,

I appreciate your response to a somewhat terse communication regarding gerrymandering and a litany of other aspects.

I would be extremely surprised if what you are proposing are your own ideas and positions; therefore I will labor under the assumption that these arguments you put forth can be changed. If so, I would ask you to meet with those in opposition to your proposal in order to expand your thought processes in areas of which you don’t seem to be aware. I would also request you do some research on our blog www.arkansasfreedom.com to acquaint yourself with documented evidence concerning the presence of illegals and their use of our welfare systems, as well as governmental enabling, etc….especially our FOI’s.

With that said, I find that you are a Michigander. A few years back you had a U.S. Senator by the name of Spencer Abraham. Spence alone was responsible for the ridiculously high number of Muslims and other mideasterners residing in your home state. I decided that in defense of our republic, I would remove him from office. Barbara & I ran a campaign, financed largely by us, under the name of Michimpac…..Michigan immigration control PAC. I spent most of a year in Michigan seeking out small conservative newspapers in which to advertise, flew drag signs over the Mich/Mich State football games & also over the U.P. on holidays while all the corrupt politicians were walking across the bridge.

Barbara & I determined if we could move 8% of the vote…Spence would be defeated…precisely what happened. Incidentally, we got no help from any of the illegal immigration reform 501 c3’s, e.g. FAIR & NumbersUSA.
May I call you Charlie? You do have a lot to learn if you are truly not complicit in this effort. You say you are 100% opposed to illegal immigration….if so, what are you doing about it? Wal-Mart & Tyson’s have long been in the forefront for open-borders and mass illegal immigration, of which your area is a citadel.
As in the case of illegal immigration you state you believe in the rule of law and insist we follow all our immigration laws, and you want to be consistent. I will insert here some of 8 USC:

1. Section 1324a….hiring, harboring, transporting any illegal alien is a felony punishable by 10 yrs. jail + $2,000 fine per illegal
2. Section 1324c...ALL OFFICERS whose duty is to enforce criminal laws have the authority to make arrests for any violation of this section
3. Section 1644…no local ordinance, rule, or measure shall stop law enforcement officers from enforcement of this section
Charlie, you say you believe in the rule of law and upholding immigration law, so………..? You state we don’t have the option of ignoring the law. Where are the arrests of the corporate heads of companies hiring illegals?

Now comes the Voting Rights Act, as you surely know the 1965 Act strictly had to do with Black American Citizens who had been denied voting rights and other significant deficiencies. What you and your handlers appear to be doing is pursuing the creation of an environment that will precipitate litigation by politicians & power-brokers (Tyson, Wal-Mart, Catholic Church, Arkansas Friendship Coalition, etc.) making the illegal Mexican and OTM invasions a civil rights matter hoping to produce amnesty. Your position has no legal foundation, unless legal Hispanics have been denied the vote, otherwise it is an affront to legal American citizens.
Nowhere in America and specifically NW Arkansas have American citizens with Mexican lineage been denied the vote, but if you think illegal aliens are not voting, you are exhibiting a substantial degree of naiveté. Methinks your Yankee heritage is at play here, in some manner. Your attempt to gerrymander a district does 2 things.

1. It increases the magnet exponentially to attract more illegal Mexicans and OTM’s into our republic and our state…all defying 8 USC.
2. Bringing attention to a gerrymandered district exacerbates the crimes being committed by the invaders, their employers & the governments which overlook standing law. This is textbook example of racist behavior. You are pursuing the creation of a national subset which is resulting in another welfare class, and at the same time you have taken the racial bait—fear of discussions on race, while your own proposition is racial, i.e. ethnic gerrymandering.
How can you expect to have a cohesive society when you constantly refer to Mexicans & OTM’s as hyphenated Americans? Why not Americans? Nationally this is done purely on purpose. You are either American or you are not.

Note, immigrants legal & illegal bring their failed cultures & philosophies to our shores and keep them in play resulting in no acculturation, accompanied by no understanding of our Constitution and what it demands.

So you see Charlie, western civilization is being erased and replaced by 3rd world uneducated, poverty-ridden, individuals who in the main smell the red meat, the unearned largesse. Are you not aware that Bear-Stearns ran an exhaustive study in 2005 that
demonstrated there were at least 20 million illegals in our country and could go as high as 25 million…most with their hands out? While displacing millions of middleclass Americans in job descriptions & lowering our quality of living. We once had Ellis Island for very rational reasons. Hispanic reproductive habits are extreme to say the least. Charlie, this will probably shock you but we are trading down, they & the government by not enforcing existing laws are destroying our schools, crime rates soar, diseases reintroduced, gang activity, every form of welfare, etc. Is this really what you want for your children?

Are you aware that former Gov. Mike Huckabee pushed through a bill in 2005 which gives illegal women free prenatal care, all ancillary services, not available to American women, producing Anchor Babies who are eligible for welfare til 21 & may import their immediate family from the mother country? In 2009 I filed an FOIA and there were already 6,000 illegal women who had delivered Anchor Babies. Are you aware that Latinos make up 42% of all WIC recipients, nutrition assistance to Women, Infants & Children?

Charlie, you can’t discuss the Hispanic invasion without determining legal vs. illegal, and corrupt politicians have made, in spite of 8 USC, it impossible to determine who is legal & who is illegal. FOIA’s to the various state commissions are received as a joke and answered with untruths, like “we don’t keep those kinds of recordsâ€

Thanks for posting this I am adding it to my voter fraud thread!

Originally Posted by April

Thanks for posting this I am adding it to my voter fraud thread!

===========================================

related

Arkansas trying to create Hispanic VOTING DISTRICT!

http://www.alipac.us/ftopic-242664-0-da ... rasc-.html

The Underground Labor Force
Is Rising To The Surface

Robert Justich and Betty Ng, CFA
January 3, 2005

Illegal immigrants constitute a large and growing force in the political, economic, and
investment spheres in The United States. The size of this extra-legal segment of the
population is significantly understated because the official U.S.Census does not capture
the total number of illegal immigrants. In turn, the growth of the underground work force
is increasingly concealing the economic impact of this below-market labor supply.

Our research has identified significant evidence that the census estimates of undocumented
immigrants may be capturing as little as half of the total undocumented population. This
gross undercounting is a serious accounting issue, which could ultimately lead to
government policy errors in the future.

Though we cannot conduct an independent census of the United States population, as
investors, we need not accept the accuracy of the official census immigration statistics,
which are widely recognized as incomplete. There are many ancillary sources of data
that provide evidence that the rate of growth in the immigrant population is much greater
than the Census Bureau statistics. School enrollments, foreign remittances, border
crossings, and housing permits are some of the statistics that point to a far greater rate of
change in the immigrant population than the census numbers. At the risk of appearing
dogmatic or taking a leap of faith, we have applied the rate of growth from these other
areas and have drawn several conclusions about the current immigration population:

1. The number of illegal immigrants in the United States may be as high as 20
million people, more than double the official 9 million people estimated by the
Census Bureau.

2. The total number of legalized immigrants entering The United States since 1990
has averaged 962,000 per year. Several credible studies indicate that the
number of illegal entries has recently crept up to 3 million per year, triple the
authorized figure.

3. Undocumented immigrants are gaining a larger share of the job market, and
hold approximately 12 to 15 million jobs in the United States (8% of the
employed)

4. Four to six million jobs have shifted to the underground market, as small
businesses take advantage of the vulnerability of illegal residents.

5. In addition to circumventing the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986,
many employers of illegal workers have taken to using unrecorded revenue
receipts. Employer enforcement has succumbed to political pressure.

6. Cell phones, internet and low-cost travel have allowed immigrants easier illegal
access to the United States and increased their ability to find employment and
circumvent immigration laws.

We believe that immigration is becoming one of the most significant economic themes of
this decade. The investment implications for 2005 and 2006 will hinge on the
forthcoming government policy decisions in amnesty, employer enforcement, and
monitoring systems, as well as the effective enforcement of the laws.

Over the coming
year, we intend to monitor and analyze the benefits and costs of assimilating a
demographic group the size of New York State into the financial and legal mainstream.

Though this challenge is not quite the magnitude of, say, German reunification, we
believe most investors are underestimating the magnitude and significance of this theme.

The growing extralegal system in the United States has distorted economic statistics and
government budget projections. The stealth labor force has enhanced many of the
economic releases that investors follow closely. Payroll numbers understate true job
growth and inflation has been artificially dampened by this seemingly endless supply of
low-wage workers. The large infusion of the imported labor supply has reduced average
annual earnings by approximately 4 to 6 percent. Real estate prices have been boosted by
the foreign population infusion. The productivity miracle may be exaggerated because
the government is incorporating the output of millions of illegal immigrants but not
counting their full labor input. Long-term budget projections are probably overstating the
potential growth of the U.S. economy because productivity is inflated. Or, stated
differently, are long-term growth projections dependent on a steady flow of illegal
immigration that no one is taking into account?

As census procedures improve and the immigration numbers are revised closer to reality,
many of these questions will be answered, and public perceptions will change. Many
government forecasts, policies and procedures will be modified to compensate for the
undercounting. The public sector will incur significant costs in assimilating a reclassified
population. An abrupt increase in employer enforcement could have a negative impact
on GDP. In the short-term, an adjustment to immigration policies could squeeze small
business profits and increase the budget deficits. Longer-term, we believe the effects
will be more balanced as this invisible work force provides aid to the demographic problems of social security. Increased enforcement of legal employment procedures
should also boost tax revenues

The implications of these massive inflows of workers are enormous. Although there are
economic benefits to cheap, illegal labor, there are significant costs associated with
circumventing the labor laws. The social expenses of health care, retirement funding,
education and law enforcement are potentially accruing at $30 billion per year. Many of
these costs lag and will not be realized until the next economic downturn and beyond as
new immigrants require a safety net.

On the revenue side, the United States may be foregoing $35 billion a year in income tax
collections because of the number of jobs that are now off the books. Illegal aliens offer
below market labor costs and many employers circumvent regulations to take advantage
of the laissez faire government enforcement process. We estimate that approximately 5
million illegal workers are collecting wages on a cash basis and are avoiding income
taxes.

The United States is simply hooked on cheap, illegal workers and deferring the costs of
providing public services to these quasi-Americans. Illegal immigration has been
America’s way of competing with the low-wage forces of Asia and Latin America, and
deserves more credit for the steroid-enhanced effect it has had on productivity, low
inflation, housing starts, and retail sales.

From a personal standpoint, our research does not take sides with any of the emotional
arguments of the Crossfire mindset. We are grateful to have had the opportunity to speak
with immigrants, local business owners, realtors, and police officers. This project
afforded us the opportunity to see into the past and look into the future of the United
States.
-----------------------------------------------
That's just the first few pages.

steinreport(.)com