Thread: Immigration Measure Said Likely to Pass

Immigration Measure Said Likely to Pass
By SUZANNE GAMBOA, Associated Press Writer
46 minutes ago



WASHINGTON - A prominent congressional opponent of sweeping immigration legislation conceded Friday the measure is likely to pass next week, adding "The Senate should be ashamed of itself."


At the same time, Sen. Jeff Sessions (news, bio, voting record), R-Ala., predicted that without significant changes, no final compromise would emerge from House-Senate negotiations this year.

Sessions indicated little chance of a filibuster, a tactic that would require supporters to amass 60 votes to prevail.

The Alabama Republican made his remarks at the end of a week of maneuvering on the Senate floor that left the fundamental provisions of the legislation intact. The bill calls for tougher border enforcement, new guest worker programs and an eventual chance at citizenship for most of the estimated 11 million to 12 million illegal immigrants already in the country.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., declined to say whether he intends to vote for the measure, although he added, "It's certainly moving in that direction." As leader, Frist has played a major role in making sure the legislation reached the Senate floor, although he also has voted for some of the amendments sought by the bill's foes.

President Bush has expressed support for the general approach taken in the legislation, but has not said whether he favors its passage.

The White House voiced support for two provisions that cleared on Thursday. One declared English to be the national language of the United States. The other deemed it the "common unifying language"

"What the president has said all along is that he wants to make sure that people who become American citizens have a command of the English language," said White House press secretary Tony Snow. "It's as simple as that."

Ironically, Snow's remarks disputed a claim made on the Senate floor by Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., the sponsor of the proposal to declare English the national language. He warned senators it was inconsistent to support both, adding, "You can't have it both ways."

Two dozen senators joined with Bush in doing so.

Supporters agreed that both measures are largely symbolic.

"We are trying to make an assimilation statement," said Sen. Lindsey Graham (news, bio, voting record), R-S.C., one of two dozen senators who voted Thursday for both proposals.

Inhofe disputed charges that making English the national language was racist or aimed at Spanish speakers. Eleven Democrats joined Republicans in voting for his measure.

The provision makes exceptions for any language assistance already guaranteed by law, such as bilingual ballots required under the Voting Rights Act or court interpreters. It also requires immigrants seeking citizenship to demonstrate a "sufficient understanding of the English language for usage in everyday life."

But critics argued the move would prevent limited English speakers from getting language assistance required by an executive order signed by President Clinton. So the Senate then voted 58-39 on saying that English is the nation's "common and unifying language."

The Homeland Security Department is in the midst of redesigning the citizenship test and some groups have been concerned about efforts to make the test more difficult.

Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo, offered the alternative. The only Republican to vote solely for Salazar's "common and unifying" language option was Sen. Pete Domenici (news, bio, voting record) of New Mexico, whose home state's constitution prohibits discrimination on basis of inability to speak, read or write English or Spanish.

Both provisions will be included in an immigration bill the Senate is expected to pass and send to conference with the House, where differences will be resolved.

Bush, who often peppers his speeches with Spanish words and phrases, had little to say about the Senate votes while visiting the Arizona-Mexico border. "The Senate needs to get the bill out," the president said.

Bush toured an unfortified section of the border in the Arizona desert Thursday, where he endorsed using fences and other barriers to cut down on illegal crossings. The Senate on Wednesday voted to put 370 miles of fences on the border
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060519/ap_ ... MlJVRPUCUl

We all need to email and Fax our Senators Sunday "There will be No Amnesty for any Senator who votes for Amnesty come election."

Make sure they have their Monday morning reading. Then we need to be calling them all day Monday with the same message.

Why the hell can't they filibuster?

The Isaaskson measure lost by one vote.

The guest-worker/amnesty had only three votes over a supermajority.

The worst that can happen is that 60+ traitors vote for cloture, we delay it for another two or three days-while shaming them even further-and fall back on the House.

What's wrong with trying?

I will now. It's filibuster time. I wonder if they would do it if they got thousands and thousands of email and phone calls from people?

Might be worth a try............

Originally Posted by Shapka

Why the hell can't they filibuster?

The Isaaskson measure lost by one vote.

The guest-worker/amnesty had only three votes over a supermajority.

The worst that can happen is that 60+ traitors vote for cloture, we delay it for another two or three days-while shaming them even further-and fall back on the House.

What's wrong with trying?

I once went to a hospital district meeting that since a quorum did not show up they could not start the meeting. No quorum, no vote?



quorum - The number of Senators that must be present for the Senate to do business. The Constitution requires a majority of Senators (51) for a quorum. Often, fewer Senators are actually present on the floor, but the Senate presumes that a quorum is present unless the contrary is shown by a roll call vote or quorum call.

Originally Posted by Shapka

Why the hell can't they filibuster?

The Isaaskson measure lost by one vote.

The guest-worker/amnesty had only three votes over a supermajority.

The worst that can happen is that 60+ traitors vote for cloture, we delay it for another two or three days-while shaming them even further-and fall back on the House.

What's wrong with trying?

As much as I admire the work of Senator Sessions, Inhofe, Kyl, etc., I have to be honest. They're simply not getting it done. If we had five more Democrats like Senator Byrd, and five less Republicans like John McLame, and Lyndsay "The Goober" Graham, this crap would be dead already.

Here's hoping that the Byrd Man pulls through.

If anyone can bury this monstrosity, before it's too late, it's him.