Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
02-02-2013, 04:32 PM #1
Immigration Reform: Rupert Murdoch and the Fox News Factor
Immigration Reform: Rupert Murdoch and the Fox News Factor
By DEVIN DWYER (@devindwyer)
WASHINGTON, Feb. 2, 2013
In the brewing battle over a path to citizenship for the nation's 11 million undocumented immigrants, Fox News Channel is uniquely positioned to play a make-or-break role. The question is, will it?
Advocates on both sides of a proposed U.S. immigration overhaul are closely eyeing the nation's most-watched cable news network -- and megaphone -- for politically-conservative causes as it joins a rapidly escalating national debate.
Will the network and its high-profile opinionators fan the flames of opposition to a comprehensive reform plan, or will it assume a more neutral role in a debate that does not break cleanly along party lines?
Rupert Murdoch, chairman and CEO at News Corp., Fox's parent company, is the wild card factor in which way Fox News will go.
Murdoch, Australian born and a naturalized U.S. citizen, has become an outspoken advocate for immigration reform and mass legalization of the country's undocumented immigrants, partnering with New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg in this cause.
Whether Murdoch's personal views will percolate through his network, or at least temper criticism on the airwaves of those who don't share it, remains to be seen.
"It depends on how prepared he is to muzzle people on Fox," said Ira Mehlman, spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform and frequent Fox News guest, who opposes the widespread legalization proposed by President Obama and a bipartisan group of U.S. senators this week.
"Rupert Murdoch, first and foremost, is a businessman," he said. "I'm not sure given all his other troubles he can afford to alienate his own audience."
Mehlman and other Republican critics of what they call an "amnesty" plan believe Fox News could be a crucial ally in the battle for public opinion on immigration.
They credit Fox News with helping to amplify their message and derail a similar legislative push that was backed mostly by Democrats and President George W. Bush in 2006 and 2007.
"That's what stopped the 2007 amnesty because all of a sudden all these members of Congress ... were getting called by their constituents saying what are you doing?" said Rosemary Jenks, the chief lobbyist with Numbers USA, which favors more stringent immigration controls.
But 2013 is shaping up to be a different game, immigrant advocates say, with Fox News possibly emerging as a potential boon.
"[Fox host] Sean Hannity is in favor, did an 180 degree turn. You're looking at [Fox host] Bill O'Reilly, who endorsed [Sen.] Marco Rubio's principles overwhelmingly. Even [Fox commentator] Charles Krauthammer has posted and said something needs to be done," said Brad Bailey, a self-described conservative Republican and businessman who chairs the Texas Immigration Solution.
"We need to see more Marco Rubios out there, we need people to come out and rally around them because the solution to this problem is what we need verses the rhetoric," Bailey said, suggesting the network could be a valuable forum to court moderates.
Bloomberg says much depends on the message Murdoch sends to Fox executives about how to handle the immigration story.
"The real thing is if he could get Fox to, you know, be the big champion, which sometimes they do," the mayor told Politico in an interview last week. But, he added, "sometimes they don't."
During a 2010 hearing on Capitol Hill, both men sat side-by-side as Murdoch told lawmakers it is "nonsense" not to provide a "full path to legalization" for the millions living and working in the shadows.
"Requiring unauthorized immigrants to register, undergo a security check, pay taxes, and learn English would bring these immigrants out of a shadow economy and into our tax base," he said at the time. He has since been pushing the message on Twitter.
"Must have sweeping, generous immigration reform, make existing law-abiding Hispanics welcome," Murdoch tweeted in November. "Most are hard-working family people."
Fox News' Influence Questioned
While Fox News primetime viewership has been on the decline in recent months, it remains a highly-profitable network with the largest news audience on cable.
Its median prime-time viewership was 1.9 million in 2011, according to the Pew Research Center, well ahead of MSNBC (773,000) and CNN (654,000).
Still, many advocates caution against overstating the influence of Fox, insisting the network will not play a decisive role in the immigration debate one way or the other.
"Talking heads are talking heads. Whatever they say is fine," said Jenks of Numbers USA, which opposes the Obama and Senate plans. "If we had relied on any of the mainstream media in 2007, that bill would have passed. We don't have any intention of relying on them this time."
Ali Noorani, executive director of the National Immigration Forum, says the diversity and bipartisanship of advocates for a reform plan -- including pathway to citizenship -- will override any single, particular influence.
"I think that Fox having the role as a conservative media outlet now, frankly, has in its Rolodex a range of conservative speakers to this issue, whether it's Sen. Marco Rubio; Leith Anderson, president of the National Association of Evangelicals; Richard Land, the head of Southern Baptist Convention -- these are conservative leaders who can speak to conservatives who want to see this country move forward with a broad immigration reform," Noorani said.
Murdoch has tried to downplay his network's influence on political debate over immigration, too.
"We are home to all views on Fox," he told the congressional panel in 2010. "We don't censor that or take any particular line at all. We are not anti-immigrant on Fox News."
DON'T REWARD THE CRIMINAL ACTIONS OF MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL ALIENS
BY GIVING THEM CITIZENSHIP
02-03-2013, 12:00 AM #2We have immigration laws that just need to be enforced.
02-03-2013, 01:52 AM #3
Has anybody noticed how nobody is talking about the border security bill that was passed in 2007? And that never was finished the way the bill was written?
How come no one is asking how they are going to do a background check on people that have no bonafides? There is no way to check the background of people from third world countries. They don't have nationalized records. And how are they going to make them pay back taxes if they have been working "in the shadows" all this time? Did the people who paid them give them a W-2? Illegal immigrants can register now, why don't they? Are they going to put a cap on that "11" million people? So if it goes up to 20 or 25 million, is that ok too? What about chain migration? Are these "11" million illegals going to be allowed to bring in their family members too? And why has no nobody mentioned the fact that while they might not be eligible for welfare programs, their US born infants are. Everybody knows infants can't work. LA County knows that. They have a 600 million dollar welfare bill for just that county. Is everyone going to be eligible. Suppose they broke other laws, like non violent laws. Do they have to physically hurt someone before they would be ineligible?
Last edited by jd421; 02-03-2013 at 01:54 AM.