Thread: New Yorkers Rally Against the SAFE Act (The Right to Keep and Bear Arms)

http://american-rattlesnake.org/2013...e-ny-safe-act/

The events of the past week have prevented us from discussing an issue dear to the hearts of many of our followers. Namely, the continuing, deliberate assault by public officials upon the intrinsic liberties of Americans. Specifically, the right to defend our lives and property from unprovoked aggression. We know what happens when citizens surrender their individual rights to the state; the burning fields in Mexico and the inferno in Sweden illustrate why entrusting your security to the guardianship of the state-which in many cases is responsible for placing you in peril in the first place-is such a monumentally foolish idea.
Unfortunately, that is precisely what public servants-who almost never serve the interests of the public-across the nation have embraced as a response to the most recent, horrific mass shootings. The most widely publicized attempt to circumscribe our right to self defense has been New York’s SAFE Act, a hastily-written, arbitrary, and capricious bill that was stampeded into law under the most questionable of circumstances and with virtually no debate.


Therefore, it’s no surprise that resistance to implementation around this state is widespread and growing. In addition to district attorneys who refuse to prosecute individuals who have run afoul of this unconstitutional, ex post facto law, there are numerous counties which have called for its repeal. In addition to these tangible demonstrations of opposition to Governor Cuomo and the legislature, there have been mass rallies, demonstrations and marches staged across the state rejecting the notion that New Yorkers who choose to exercise their constitutional rights are no better than common criminals...

RELATED http://www.alipac.us/f9/new-york-gun...cedent-279629/

Disarming America is The Globalists dream come true

on the other hand; the 2nd Amendment is far bigger and more permenent than temporary Politicians that are worthless on either side of the isle

POLICEMAN’S FIFTEEN YEAR OLD SON DEFENDS HIS HOME AND SHOOTS INTRUDER WITH AR-15

By Joe Calandra Jr.
Published: May 29, 2013 | 3 Comments



No more than a month ago, President Obama said:

“…It’s time to restore the ban on military-style assault weapons, and a 10-round limit for magazines, to make it harder for a gunman to fire 154 bullets into his victims in less than five minutes. Let’s put that to a vote.”

The President and his surrogates have been saying that their zealous advocacy for banning any weapon with more than a ten round capacity comes from an earnest desire to “Make it a little harder for our kids to get gunned down.”

The President must have missed the bit of news coming out of a sleepy little American town where a police lieutenant’s fifteen year-old son was being threatened by a would-be robber while his dad was on duty. The teen had to take up arms to defend himself and his family’s home against the criminal.

The teenager shot the robber with his dad’s AR-15 Assault Rifle modeled on the U.S. military’s M-16. He drew blood from the would-be robber and sent the suspect, who could have killed him and stolen his family’s possessions, running in terror.

Video at the Page Link: http://www.libertynews.com/2013/05/p...er-with-ar-15/

Perhaps having legal magazines with a higher capacity than ten rounds makes it harder for criminals to gun down kids and banning those clips might make it easier for kids to get gunned down by criminals.

http://www.libertynews.com/2013/05/p...er-with-ar-15/