Thread: [Watch] Hillary Clinton, The Butcher of Benghazi – A Video That Shows It Does Make a

[Watch] Hillary Clinton, The Butcher of Benghazi – A Video That Shows It Does Make a Difference

Posted on 8 May, 2014 by Rick Wells



Responsibility for the murder of four Americans in Benghazi is being fought hard by those with the most to lose, B. Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton.

This video provides a good summary and gives a general timeline of where we are and what we know up to this point in time.

From a dismissal of the recognized threat that multiple sources warned of prior to the attack, to stand down orders given while the attack was under way, to the present select committee beginning its investigations, the video lays out a case disputing the false claims of those who orchestrated our limited and wrong-headed response.



For those of us with Democrat or progressive associates and friends, this would be a good video to offer them when they parrot the claims of the administration and the media, agreeing with Hillary Clinton that it doesn’t make a difference.

Lots of criminals would like to use that line to take the heat off of their wrong-doing. It doesn’t work and what happened does matter.

Rick Wells is a conservative author who believes an adherence the U.S. Constitution would solve many of today’s problems. “Like” him on Facebook and “Follow” him on Twitter.

http://gopthedailydose.com/2014/05/0...-a-difference/

Benghazi Cover Up Bombshells Exploding in Midst of Release of Documents

Pamela Geller 5 hours ago
1 Comment

We now have the evidence that the State Department knew right away that Benghazi was a jihad terror attack. We know that Susan Rice knew. Barack Obama also knew and lied to the American people.
The Democrats are threatening to boycott the select committee on the Benghazi jihad attack on September 11,2012. The media is cheering their subterfuge on, hoping to normalize glaring un-Americanism, so that the president can easily follow suit. Once again, the Democrats overreach. Does the Watergate-flogging party mean to stump for the suppression of the truth about the slaughter of our countrymen? Is that their campaign platform? Do they really believe they are going to win on a platform of propaganda?

The emails make it perfectly clear that it was known from the outset that Islamic terrorists planned and coordinated the attacks on our consulate in Benghazi.
Treason is the accurate term for the actions of the Obama administration in the aftermath of Benghazi. The president knew within 24 hours that it was Islamic terror.
And yet in the post-Benghazi fallout, Obama continued to attack and blame free speech for the Benghazi slaughter. Obama, along with Hillary Clinton, starred in a paid advertisement condemning the video insulting Islam. These paid advertisements (funded with American taxpayer dollars) ran in Pakistan. This presidential attack on our freedom and our Constitution was the Obama administration's primary response to the deadly Islamist attack on September 11, 2012.
He knew. He knew from the very first.
In reviewing the cache of new documents just released as a result of Judicial Watch's successful FOIA lawsuit, it is clear that there is more incriminating evidence of a cover up than just the now-infamous "smoking gun" email from Ben Rhodes. Rhodes' email is slam-dunk evidence of the White House's lead role in the cover up. The blaming of the YouTube video and the talking point lies that Susan Rice was to advance on the five Sunday shows were driven by the White House.
In reviewing the 41 new documents, one sees that huge sections of these unclassified documents are blacked out. If they are unclassified, why are all the Benghazi paragraphs redacted? Fox News is reporting there are discrepancies between the emails released to Congress and the same emails released to the watchdog group, Judicial Watch.
Still, some material extremely damaging to the administration is clear. In a memo from former Deputy Spokesman at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations Payton Knopf to Susan Rice and others, Knopf provides "Guidance on Events in Libya 9/12/12. (Today's initial guidance from NSS and State)." In it, he gives a timeline ("the tick tock") of events on that day and quotes the State Department's Victoria Nuland as saying that "it was clearly a complex attack."
In the same memo, Knopf discusses Obama's "tick tock" during Benghazi. The president was made aware of the attack on the afternoon of September 11, 2012 "as he started his weekly meeting with the Secretary of Defense and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs." Ironically, only a day before the Benghazi jihad attacks, Marc Thiessen broke the story in the Washington Post that Obama had scaled back in-person daily intelligence briefings and had actually attended fewer than half of the daily intelligence briefings that had been held since he entered the White House.
But what's salient here is that according to Benghazi transcripts of defense testimony, just minutes after the American consulate in Benghazi was attacked, senior defense officials, both civilian and military, were told that it was a "terrorist attack." So why did the Obama White House promote a false narrative, and why didn't defense officials speak out about this false claim?
After being notified that it was a terrorist attack on the afternoon of September 11, 2012, Obama was "updated several times throughout the evening and the next morning." When asked when he had heard of Ambassador Steven's murder, Nuland said, "The president was notified last night that Ambassador Stevens was unaccounted for and then notified again this morning of about his tragic death."
At 11:53 PM on September 11, senior adviser Eric Pelofsky told Rice that a Libyan government official had called him to "extend his condolences" over Ambassador Stevens' death. Pelofsky said that they had not recovered the Ambassador's body, but referred to "a photo on twitter of someone carrying a body of someone who resembles Chris over their shoulder." Pelofsky had previously written that it looked as if the death of Stevens was a kidnapping gone bad. "Yes – I'm very worried. In particular, that he is either dead or this was a concerted effort to kidnap him," wrote Pelofsky at 9:06 PM Eastern the night of the attack. This, too, contradicts the State Department version of events.
I find it impossible to believe that the president of the United States was not notified immediately that night, while Pelofsky was writing about Stevens' death, that our Ambassador had been taken from our embassy possibly still alive and then murdered. But Nuland clearly says he was notified the next morning.
If he was asleep at that time, they wouldn't wake him for such momentous news? Why wasn't he calling the shots? He's the Commander-in-Chief – or had he by that time already given the stand down order? The American people need answers to such questions, and let the chips fall where they may – or bodies, in this case. Why are they covering up the point at which Obama was informed about Stevens' death?

And there is still more. In an email on September 11, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Alex McPhillips, Press Officer at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations, advised Rice thatAnsar Al-Sharia was attacking the consulate. The first reports came into the White House between 4:00 and 5:00 PM that day.
In the same email from Knopf concerning "Guidance on Events in Libya 9/12/12," he asked Nuland what State knew about the group taking credit, Ansar al-Sharia. Nuland would only say, "It's very early and I'm not going to be able to offer an assessment of this group." The point is – it was known that Ansar al-Sharia was taking credit for the attack in a widely distributed State Department email on September 12, 2012. Everybody knew that the al-Qaeda-linked group was behind the attack.
Yet the White House statement of September 12, 2012 did not call it a terror attack. Obama called it "an outrageous attack." It sounds like a Broadway review. It was an outrageous lie.
And in Hillary Clinton's press release that same evening, Clinton referred to the Muhammad video in her remarks and stated unequivocally that the "United States deplores any intentional efforts to denigrate the religious belief of others."
The frenzy was not to save our beloved countrymen. The frenzy was to save Obama's election – this while our boys were in the firefight of their lives.
There is also proof that Rice was lying when she said that security on the ground was strong and significant. In an email at 4:49 PM on September 11th– 49 minutes after the attack began, according to the State Department's own timeline – State's Dan Fogarty advised several officials, including Deputy Secretary of State William Burns, Victoria Nuland, and others that the February 17 Brigade were responding to the attack on the mission [consulate] "engaging the attackers, taking fire, and working its way to the compound to get to the villa…"
The February 17 Revolution Brigade is a jihadist militia that is tied to the Muslim Brotherhood. It was repeatedly accused of engaging in atrocities during and after the Libyan Civil War. Yes, with the world's largest, most technologically advanced, and best-armed military, the Obama administration and State Department outsourced their response to a jihadist group.
Back in September 2012, according to the Daily Beast, "the intelligence community had an intercept between a Libyan politician whose sympathies are with al Qaeda and the Libyan militia known as the February 17 Brigade – which had been charged with providing local security to the consulate. In the intercept, the Libyan politician apparently asks an officer in the brigade to have his men stand down for a pending attack – another piece of evidence implying the violence was planned in advance." In other words, it wasn't a spontaneous reaction to a video about Muhammad.
What I also want to know is why hasn't the FBI released Christopher Stevens' autopsy report? How did he die, precisely?
And where was Obama on the night of September 11, 2012?
I await more of Judicial Watch's documents in the hope that they might shed more light on what happened on that fateful day. But what we know already is enough to begin impeachment proceedings.
Source
Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.
You can also get Freedom Outpost delivered to your Amazon Kindle device here.

http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/05/be...ase-documents/

Could This Mean The “Butcher Of Benghazi” Hillary Clinton Is Headed To Prison?

There’s a huge movement powered by social media. Help spread the word!

Kris Zane — May 8, 2014

Video at the Page Link:

Hillary Clinton, known as the “Butcher of Benghazi” after the release of the scathing report “Breach of Duty: Hillary Clinton and Catastrophic Failure in Benghazi,” refused dozens of requests for additional security at the Benghazi consulate.

The report also reveals that Clinton held back a special forces State Department Foreign Emergency Support Team on the night of September 11, 2012—essentially giving a stand down order—leaving Islamic radicals to butcher Chris Stevens, Shawn Smith, Ty Woods, and Glen Doherty.

Clinton and Obama couldn’t reveal that they left Americans to be slaughtered, and so began the fantasy about a “protest turned violent” over an anti-Muslim YouTube video virtually no one had seen. When that became laughable, Clinton and Obama then blamed the CIA for bad intel about the phony protest. This was also a lie as revealed in a huge cache of emails obtained by the government watchdog group Judicial Watch last week.

According to the emails, Clinton and the rest of the Obama administration were feverishly working to cover up the fact that al-Qaeda had attacked our embassy. Feverishly trying to cover up the fact that the consulate didn’t have sufficient security. And feverishly trying to create a lie big enough that the entire American public would fall for it. Clinton and Obama cared more about saving their political careers than saving the lives of four Americans.

Obama and Clinton stood by as four Americans were murdered.
If a murder is in progress, and the President of the United States and Secretary of State do nothing, that is accessory to murder. And up until now, Clinton and Obama have gotten away with murder.
But there’s a new sheriff in town: “Benghazi Bulldog” Trey Gowdy, appointed to head the Select Committee on Benghazi. And this Sheriff is going after Clinton and Obama with guns blazing!

Plus, there’s a huge movement powered by social media calling for Hillary Clinton to be sent to prison for her role in the Benghazi massacre. The movement is called “Hillary Clinton for Prison 2016.”
We can only hope…

The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/but...headed-prison/

Rush Limbaugh

State Department personnel knew exactly what was going on when it was going on.



Benghazi Terrorists Used State Department Cell Phones? - The Rush Limbaugh Show
RUSH: It means that State Department personnel knew exactly what was going on...
Rush Limbaugh

Benghazi Terrorists Used State Department Cell Phones?

June 12, 2014


Windows Media


BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: The terrorists who attacked the US consulate and the CIA annex in Benghazi were using State Department cell phones. Now, wait. They were using cell phones seized from State Department personnel during the attacks. Now, what does that mean? It's bad enough that the attacks separated our people from their cell phones. It's bad enough that the bad guys ended up with State Department cell phones and started using them. But what does that mean?
It means that State Department personnel knew exactly what was going on when it was going on. They had real-time evidence because the bad guys were using the State Department cell phone network. "US spy agencies overheard them contacting more senior terrorist leaders to report on the success of the operation." This is a story from Bret Baier and James Rosen at Fox News. Now, the disclosure is important because it adds to the body of evidence that establishes that senior US officials in the Regime knew early on that Benghazi was a terror attack and not a spontaneous protest over an anti-Islam video that had gone awry, which the Regime claimed for several weeks after the attacks.



This is just another slice of evidence that they knew at the time what this was. This is another bit of evidence that the Obama administration was lying and doing so for weeks in the aftermath. They were listening. The terrorists had State Department cell phones and were reporting their success to their superiors. We were monitoring that network. (interruption) Well, I don't know about can't track 'em down. I don't know if they're still using State Department cell phones. I don't know if they have the right chargers. Could be using USB versus Lightning. Who knows what the terrorists have in their tech arsenal.
But this is striking, folks. This is just another couple of exclamation points to illustrate the degree and purposefulness to which this Regime was lying about everything having to do with Benghazi. "The disclosure is important because it adds to the body of evidence establishing that senior U.S. officials in the Obama administration knew early on --" like, at the moment "-- that Benghazi was a terrorist attack, and not a spontaneous protest over an anti-Islam video that had gone awry."
In fact, I'll tell you what else. This discovery, this revelation explains how the CIA and other intelligence agencies knew in real time that it was a terror attack. They knew it in real time. The CIA. And remember, the CIA was blamed for the early edits of the talking points, which made this a random protest. In other words, folks, they didn't have to intercept and decode anything. They were able to actually hear the terrorists talking to their terrorist leaders on their own phones.
And note something else. This is something we've never known before. This is a new revelation. This is something that has been covered up. Somehow it has been uncovered. It has been revealed. And it's further proof of why we need this House Select Committee to get out the facts of what happened in Benghazi.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Santos, Yuba City, California, great to have you on the EIB Network. Hi.
CALLER: Hi, Rush. Mega blueberry sweetened Two If By Tea dittos. Rush considering this information that Bret Baier just revealed --
RUSH: Yeah.
CALLER: -- about the attackers in Benghazi using cell phones of Benghazi employees, or consulate employees. Are those conversations recorded or are there transcripts available, do you think, or are those things -- I understand --
RUSH: There's no question they were recorded. NSA records everything.
CALLER: Well, I know they record the metadata, which is the phone number to phone number type numbers. I'm just curious, this would put to bed our assertion that the attack was more than just due to a video.
RUSH: Somebody's heard it because the details of what they were saying were reported. I'm sure that there are transcripts. I'm sure that there are. Not that we're ever gonna see them. But I'm sure that there are. Santos, I appreciate the call.
END TRANSCRIPT

Related Links

• Fox News: US Spy Agencies Heard Benghazi Attackers Using State Dept. Cell Phones to Call Terrorist Leaders

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/20...nt_cell_phones