Thread: Anchor baby issue on O'Reilly tonight

I rarely watch the "pinhead". 10% of the time? Probably less than that in MHO.

OK, after watching O'Reilly and Jeraldo go at it over the illegal drunk driving accident, I have the following question:

WHAT MOMENTUM?

From a talk show? What momentum can you get from a talk show? I am confused, what is the expectation?

Now, had someone suggested we take some kind of action, I'm all for that. It is time we camp out in our representatives offices, do more than send letters that are usually shreaded, etc. I am tired of talk, what do we do?

manlyva153 wrote,

what do we do?

Vote with your feet, vote with your dollar. Each small step adds up.

Try cancelling your cable subscription. Include a little note, "Sorry, I have had enough of all of the propaganda. I no longer wish to live in your box."

Just a thought.

I may be wrong but my attitude is: There's no such thing as bad publicity. The more the media talks about these issues the better. Even when they're spewing propaganda and misinformation. For its a direct reflection of how much interest there is in this subject. Which is a lot. Of interest, that is. And more and more interest every day.

Obama and Congress would prefer to sneak amnesty through the backdoor when nobody is listening. The fact that so much noise is being generated on the public airwaves makes that impossible now. The more noise the better!!!!! Everybody keep talking.

Issue One: Bill O'Reilly is no conservative. He is for Bill O'Reilly. The most self-serving ego maniac I have ever seen.

Issue Two: This item from the THE HILL magazine based on Capitol Hill in D.C.

[u]Senate Democrats pushed back Tuesday against Republican demands to change a part of the 14th Amendment that grants U.S. citizenship by birthright to children of illegal immigrants.

Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) and GOP Whip Jon Kyl (Ariz.) have called for hearings on the amendment.

The arguing is over the Citizenship Clause to the 14th Amendment, which was adopted in 1868 during the Reconstruction era. The clause was intended to reverse the 1857 Supreme Court decision in the Dred Scott case that denied citizenship to African-Americans. The Supreme Court subsequently interpreted the clause to mean that children born in the United States have an inherent right to citizenship.

Republicans maintained Tuesday that modern times present a much more difficult situation, with immigration stressing the country’s resources and dividing the country.

“I’m supportive of [changing the provision] because at the time the amendment was put in, transportation was different, the environment was different and we didn’t have as much crime,â€

America should follow the direction as that of our neighbor to the north, Canada. The number of illegals were beginning to swell at an alarming rate...even though by comparison, (their numbers were in the 100,000's of thousands, ours are in the millions) In 2006, they began deporting illegal aliens in the droves. Amnesty was not on the table, even though they had the same type of protest "rights" voices (civil, human, etc. etc. etc.) in the minority that this country has, and for the same reasons.

Giving birth to a child in Canada does not confer any rights or privileges to the parents. You give birth in Canada, you either take the child with you or leave the child in the care of relatives or guardians. Parents have to vacate the country, even though the child does have Canadian citizenship rights after age 18, and can return as citizens to the country of their birth. There is no immediate "residency" possibility for the parents, period.

Originally Posted by Acebackwords

I may be wrong but my attitude is: There's no such thing as bad publicity. The more the media talks about these issues the better. Even when they're spewing propaganda and misinformation. For its a direct reflection of how much interest there is in this subject. Which is a lot. Of interest, that is. And more and more interest every day.

Obama and Congress would prefer to sneak amnesty through the backdoor when nobody is listening. The fact that so much noise is being generated on the public airwaves makes that impossible now. The more noise the better!!!!! Everybody keep talking.

In case no one has noticed, the messiah thrives on media talking, then he does the opposite. If there was ever a case of "do as I say, not as I do", he is walking, talking proof. He remains unfazed by all the "hoop-la" and continues his course of progressive, socialistic legislation. Yes, I said Legislation, who do you think is introducing these whack-job bills in congress? His "organizational" groups through him, passed through the VP. Yes, they are afraid of getting mentioned on O'Reilly, Beck, Hannity, Cavauto...but that doesn't stop him. Only real live action will stop this short sighted loser.