Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    Bloomberg Writer: Sen. Tim Scott’s Success Due To GOP “Lowering The Bar” For Blacks…

    Conservative Lady

    Bloomberg Writer: Sen. Tim Scott’s Success Due To GOP “Lowering The Bar” For Blacks…



    Bloomberg Writer: Sen. Tim Scott’s Success Due To GOP “Lowering The Bar” For Blacks…

    Of course it has nothing to do with Tim Scott having one of the strongest...

    gopthedailydose.com

    Bloomberg Writer: Sen. Tim Scott’s Success Due To GOP “Lowering The Bar” For Blacks…

    Posted on 10 May, 2014 by Dylan


    Of course it has nothing to do with Tim Scott having one of the strongest conservative voting records in the Senate.
    Do Republicans Lower the Bar for Blacks?

    Bloomberg View
    Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky has a Tea Party primary challenger. Speaker of the House John Boehner just dispatched one of his own this week in Ohio’s Republican primary. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, facing opposition from the right, has six candidates vying to unseat him in South Carolina’s June primary.
    You know who doesn’t have a serious primary challenger, Tea Party or otherwise? Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina. That’s intriguing. Appointed in 2013 by Governor Nikki Haley to fill the seat vacated by former Senator Jim DeMint, Scott is the first black Republican in the Senate since Edward Brooke of Massachusetts, who served in the era when Dino-RINOs of the Nelson Rockefeller and Charles Percy persuasion roamed the earth. (Randall Young of Greenville has filed papers to challenge Scott in the primary; according to the State newspaper, Young, who received 24 votes last time he ran for office, gave election officials only a post office box and a nonworking telephone number.) [...]
    Affirmative action based on race has taken quite a beating at the Supreme Court, in state legislatures and at the ballot box. In the Republican Party, however, affirmative action can punch your ticket like nobody’s business.

    LOL, You demokkkrats have Hank… He’s a rocket scientist ..




    http://weaselzippers.us/185554-bloom...ar-for-blacks/



    http://gopthedailydose.com/2014/05/1...ng-bar-blacks/
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696
    Bloomberg Writer: Black Republicans Are a 'Lower' Group



    by Warner Todd Huston 10 May 2014, 7:27 AM PDT 743 post a comment

    Sen. Scott reacts to comment from NC...


    South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott is talking about a comment made by the president of the North Carolina NAACP.





    Bloomberg writer Francis Wilkinson recently wrote a piece claiming that Republican Senator Tim Scott of South Carolina--an African American--only became a senator because Republicans "lowered the bar" for his appointment. He also claimed that Scott’s candidacy serves as a "shield" for racist Tea Party members to hide behind.

    Video at the Page Link:

    In an article that is more invective than analysis, Wilkinson essentially called Senator Scott a do-nothing senator. He said Scott acted like a "shield" for racist, Confederate flag-waving Tea Party members who need someone to replace Herman Cain as the favorite candidate behind whom they can hide their racism.
    Wilkinson made these assessments because Scott didn't get a Tea Party challenger even as so many other incumbents across the country did.
    But the writer answered his own question in his own piece as to why Scott may not have faced a Tea Party challenger. "Scott placed himself so far to the right that there was no space for a Tea Party challenge on ideological grounds," Wilkinson wrote.
    The columnist further reported that Scott "has an 'F' on the NAACP legislative scorecard" and a high score on the "right-wing Heritage Action scorecard--94 out of a possible 100."
    It would make sense that Scott didn't get a Tea Party challenge compared to those others whom Wilkinson said were getting challenges. He cited House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Minority leader Mitch McConnell, both establishment party bosses who, because of their legislative actions, have drawn the ire of Tea Party members.
    Scott, however, is not a target of Tea Partiers because he has, as Wilkinson noted, "positioned himself" with them ideologically.
    But this wasn't good enough for Wilkinson. No, Wilkinson thought that the real reason was because all his white backers are undercover racists.
    "The act of supporting a black conservative," Wilkinson claimed, "is both an absolution for the past and a shield for the present and future. In South Carolina, where the Confederate battle flag still flies on the state capitol grounds, and where a recent lieutenant governor seemed a little too enthusiastic about all things confederate, that matters."
    This sort of "undercover racist" charge is all the rage among liberals. Somehow they expect America to believe that someone who hates blacks will vote for one so that people won't know they hate blacks--as if a guttural, unthinking hatred can be disguised with a logically derived facade like that.
    Then Wilkinson revealed his own biases as he intimated that black Republicans just aren't smart enough to be worthy elected officials:
    In effect, South Carolina Republicans treat Scott like the national party previously treated the ham-handed presidential candidate Herman Cain and the party's not-quite-competent chairman during Obama's first term, Michael Steele: They are members of an endangered political species for whom the bar is effectively lowered.
    On what did the columnist base this assessment? The word of a single, unidentified Republican he dredged up in South Carolina. So much for journalistic practices of having at least two legitimate sources for something!
    It seems clear this article says more about Francis Wilkinson than it does Senator Tim Scott. It makes one want to say, “Lighten up, Francis.”
    But this Wilkinson has a long history of claiming that whites--all but him, of course--are racists and that Republicans just can't stop being hood-wearing bigots. If his oeuvre is any indication, he is obsessed with race.
    For example, in April, Wilkinson said that racist comments from Clippers owner Donald Sterling proved that racism is as bad in the U.S. as it ever was and hinted that Republicans and conservatives are trying to cover it up or ignore it.
    In December of last year when the film 12 Years a Slave came out, Wilkinson said that conservatives "abet racism in their ranks."
    In November last year, Wilkinson dredged up the well-worn chestnut that opposition to Obama is really just white racism at its most typical.
    Last July, Wilkinson wrote an article where he said that gun owners are white racists.
    He has also written about income inequality and lamented that newspapers are dying and that writers are finding it harder to make a living. Meanwhile, Wilkinson admitted that in 2007, he was part of the team that helped implement Huffington Post's scheme of populating its pages with the work of hundreds of unpaid bloggers as he earned a good salary for posting work for which he paid nothing. It seems he didn’t feel that bad about his fellow writers after all.


    Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston or email the author at igcolonel@hotmail.com.


    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journal...-a-Lower-Group
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-07-2014, 03:59 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-15-2013, 03:27 PM
  3. after lowering standards for BP corruption rises
    By agrneydgrl in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-29-2009, 11:57 PM
  4. Illinois proposes lowering the voting age to 17
    By crazybird in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-27-2008, 07:12 PM
  5. N.Y.: NOT FOR NUTHIN’ - Lowering car insurance – Ha!
    By Jean in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-20-2007, 07:53 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •