Thread: Entitlement of Illegal Invaders is only a media creation.

Many people mull over the reasons that cause illegal immigration and I have noticed that generally almost everyone becomes enraged by the hypocritical sense of entitlement and demands made by this wave of lawbreakers. Of course the demands made by illegals are definitely something they are in pursuit of, but they create a more sinister obstacle designed to burden any opposition. The simple logic of the pro-invader/open borders lobby is to make extreme and monumental demands hoping not necessarily to achieve those demands, but to fall slight short of them. I believe this comes from their inherent understanding of how Western Civilizations work and an exploitation of its flaws. Simply put, members of Western Civilization sovereign states have a tendency to react to any concept or idea with the assumption that the concept has been presented for the purpose of resolution. The idea that a thesis may be challenged until disprove or changed is par for the course in our society. The sole purpose of discourse is to achieve an answer. What drives this actually ends up being the critical flaw that illegal invaders exploit and manipulate. The other assumption is the intent of bringing up a concept by any party is to arrive at a solution. This assumption is how the invader movement exploits true discourse. They simply overload us (Western Civilization) with mounds of absurdities, massive entitlements, demands and concepts. It is well known that Americans especially, like to be known as negotiators and have a tendency to resolve situations in a sort of legal sense of the word. In fact, we are accountable for this because of how we treated Mexico after their "revolution." Britian and France made very specific demands of compensation for all of the murders and destruction of property committed by the Mexicans during this period of peasant anarchy. They received them as the Mexicans knew that fighting a war against remote, understrengthed, not resupplied and unreinforced troops from Europe was one thing. Garnering the attention of colonial powers and their war capabilities was another. So the Mexicans paid up. The US on the other hand decided to "negotiate" our civilian losses and destroyed/confiscated property, making no demands of payment or consequence. This was probably the birth of Mexican entitlement with our country. Mexico has in place the same value system of reacting to authority as does countries like Syria, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Lybia and many other middle eastern countries.

This simply comes back to sense of entitlement and what pushes it. The point I want to make is that the illegals and their handlers know without a doubt that they are breaking the law and acting as agents of foreign powers. This was clearly established in 1976 from the Supreme Court decision Mathews vs Diazz 1976.

Here is a quote from this decision that sets clearly the guidelines for illegal behavior in our country and their entitlements:

Neither the overnight visitor, the unfriendly agent of a foreign power, the resident diplomat, nor the illegal entrant, can advance even a colorable constitutional claim to a share in the bounty that a conscientious sovereign makes available to its own citizens and some of its guests.

I am guessing that this is so clear Bush and the global corp zealots are just seeing right thru it. This decision also mentions that the states cannot usurp federal immigration law or counter it (as NY currently has done). So with this in mind the violations of law, demands of amnesty and benefits by politicians have been in clear violation of this clause. The entitlement is a fictional creation designed to inspire these hateful hordes into a foaming frenzy. Just like the nazis did with their Atlantian theories, just like Mao did and just like Castro did...It hasn't changed except for the fact that it is funded by some of the same corporate interests that run our media outlets.

Before any illegals should be removed, I think it only fair that Bush, the Senate, Congress, Mayors and Govenor's get it first.

Well they are in fact illegal, so the rule of law requires that they be held accountable for their crimes. I personally think it would be a msitake to allow their crimes to be tied to political movements. But I do agree that we HAVE to put the betrayals of our polticians in our mind at the ballot box. We will end their careers and make it known why they now wander aimlessly thru a political graveyard full of greedy and lost men.

I would like to see them in prison. Our politicans deserve no less. They are trying destroy a country.

Originally Posted by Paige

I would like to see them in prison. Our politicans deserve no less. They are trying destroy a country.

I do like to remind our sellout politicians that Jefferson Davis, first a US Senator and then President of the Confederacy, spent time in prison after the Civil War for treason. When We the People regain control of our government they might end up in prison also.

But I do agree that we HAVE to put the betrayals of our polticians in our mind at the ballot box.

In order to settle it at the ballot box, we must have a reasonable alternative. At this point I don't see enough people stepping up to make a difference. None of the front-runners for president is espousing a position on illegal immigration that varies dramatically from the failed package. The elections to seats in congress take on an even larger importance to keep the future president in check.

Analyses of 2008 Senate Races:

Alabama Senate Race
Incumbent:
Jeff Sessions (R) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
State Senator Vivian Davis Figures (D)
*******************************
Arkansas Senate Race
Incumbent:
Mark Pryor (D) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
Former Governor Mike Huckabee (R) unannounced
*******************************
Alaska Senate Race
Incumbent:
Ted Stevens (R) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
Mayor of Anchorage Mark Begich (D) unannounced
Former Governor Tony Knowles (D)
*******************************
Colorado Senate Race
Incumbent:
Wayne Allard (R) retiring/resigning

Challengers:
Representative Mark Udall (D)
Former Representative Bob Schaffer (R)
*******************************
Delaware Senate Race
Incumbent:
Joe Biden (D) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
Attorney General Beau Biden (D) if Joe retires
Representative Michael Castle (R)
*******************************
Georgia Senate Race
Incumbent:
Saxby Chambliss (R) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
CEO of Dekalb County Vernon Jones (D)
TV Journalist Dale Cardwell (D)
*******************************
Idaho Senate Race
Incumbent:
Larry Craig (R) retiring/resigning

Challengers:
Lieutenant Governor and former Governor Jim Risch (R)
Veterinarian Rex Rammell (R)
Former Representative Larry LaRocco (D)
*******************************
Illinois Senate Race
Incumbent:
Dick Durbin (D) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
A doctor, a truck driver, and three failed political candidates (R)
*******************************
Iowa Senate Race
Incumbent:
Tom Harkin (D) no announcement

Challengers:
Businessman Steve Rathje (R)
Businessman Bob McDowell (R)
*******************************
Kansas Senate Race
Incumbent:
Pat Roberts (R) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
?? (D)
*******************************
Kentucky Senate Race
Incumbent:
Mitch McConnell (R)

Challengers:
Representative Ben Chandler (D)
State Attorney General Greg Stumbo (D)
*******************************
Louisiana Senate Race
Incumbent:
Mary Landrieu (D) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
State Treasurer John N. Kennedy (R)
Others to follow
*******************************
Maine Senate Race
Incumbent:
Susan Collins (R) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
Representative Tom Allen (D)
*******************************
Massachusetts Senate Race
Incumbent:
John Kerry (D) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
Ex-Delta Force Officer Jeff Beatty (R)
*******************************
Michigan Senate Race
Incumbent:
Carl Levin (D) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
?? (R)
*******************************
Minnesota Senate Race
Incumbent:
Norm Coleman (R) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
Comedian Al Franken (D)
Attorney Jim Ciresi (D)
*******************************
Mississippi Senate Race
Incumbent:
Thad Cochran (R) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
State Representative Erik Fleming (D)
Congressman Gene Taylor (D)
Former State Attorney General Mike Moore (D)
*******************************
Montana Senate Race
Incumbent:
Max Baucus (D) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
Former State House Majority Leader Michael Lange (R)
*******************************
Nebraska Senate Race
Incumbent:
Chuck Hagel (R) retiring

Challengers:
Attorney General Jon Bruning (R)
Former Governor, current Secretary of Agriculture Mike Johanns (R)
Former Mayor of Omaha Hal Daub (R)
Mayor of Omaha Mike Fahey (D)
Former Senator Bob Kerrey (D)
*******************************
New Hampshire Senate Race
Incumbent:
John E. Sununu (R) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
Former Governor Jeanne Shaheen (D)
*******************************
New Jersey Senate Race
Incumbent:
Frank Lautenberg (D) indicated interest in reelection bid

Challengers:
??(R)
*******************************
New Mexico Senate Race
Incumbent:
Pete Domenici (R) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
Patricia Madrid (D) unannounced
*******************************
North Carolina Senate Race
Incumbent:
Elizabeth Dole (R), announced reelection bid

Challengers:
??(D)
*******************************
Oklahoma Senate Race
Incumbent:
Jim Inhofe (R) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
State Senator Kenneth Corn (D)
State Senator Andrew Rice (D)
*******************************
Oregon Senate Race
Incumbent:
Gordon Smith (R) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
State House Speaker Jeff Merkley (D)
Lawyer/Activist Steve Novick (D)
*******************************
Rhode Island Senate Race
Incumbent:
Jack Reed (D) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
?? (R)
*******************************
South Carolina Senate Race
Incumbent:
Lindsey Graham (R) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
?? (D)
*******************************
South Dakota Senate Race
Incumbent:
Tim Johnson (D) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
State Representative Joel Dykstra (R)
Governor Mike Rounds (R) unannounced
*******************************
Tennessee Senate Race
Incumbent:
Lamar Alexander (R) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
former Representative Harold Ford (D) unannounced
Governor Phil Bredesen (D) unannounced
*******************************
Texas Senate Race
Incumbent:
John Cornyn (R) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
?? (D)
*******************************
Virginia Senate Race
Incumbent:
John Warner (R) retiring

Challengers:
Former Governor Mark Warner (D)
Representative Tom Davis (R)
*******************************
West Virginia Senate Race
Incumbent:
Jay Rockefeller (R) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
??(R)
*******************************
Wyoming Senate Race
Incumbent:
Incumbent 1- Mike Enzi (R) announced reelection bid
Incumbent 2- John Barrasso (D) announced reelection bid

Challengers:
Governor Dave Fruedenthal (D) unannounced
Cynthia Lummis (R) unannounced
*******************************
http://www.upfrontpolitics.com/senate-analyses