Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    1,247

    Mex Hypocracy-Mex Death Row Inmates

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080619/ts_ ... St8XUE1vAI

    Mexico's message, "Let our consular staff coach Mexican criminals in your country so we can get them out on lesser charges, but remember, when you come to our country it's our "no judicial process for aliens rule" that YOU AMERICANS are subject to."

    By Emma Thomasson
    Thu Jun 19, 6:45 AM ET



    THE HAGUE (Reuters) - Mexico asked the World Court on Thursday to take urgent steps to stop imminent U.S. executions of five Mexicans on death row who were denied their rights to consular assistance.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    One of the five, Jose Medellin, is due to die on August 5 in Texas, which is poised to set execution dates for the others.

    The International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague ruled in 2004 that the United States had violated international law by failing to inform 51 Mexicans now on death row of their right to consular assistance and said the cases should be reviewed.

    Mexican representative Juan Manuel Gomez-Robledo said the United States was in breach of its international obligations, and asked the U.N.'s highest court to seek stays of the five imminent executions.

    "Five Mexican nationals ... could be executed without their convictions and sentences being given the review and reconsideration that is their right," he said.

    The issue has soured relations between the United States and its southern neighbor Mexico, which opposes the U.S. death penalty. The United States will put its case later on Thursday.

    "The situation is indisputably urgent," said Donald Donovan, a lawyer for Mexico. "It is impossible to identify an act more irreparable than the execution of a human being."

    In 2005, President George W. Bush, a staunch defender of the death penalty, directed state courts to review the 51 cases following the World Court's ruling, saying the United States must adhere to its international treaty obligations.

    But the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in March that Bush overstepped his authority when he directed Texas to comply with the ICJ's ruling and reopen the case against Medellin.

    RULE OF LAW

    A gang member, Medellin was denied the right to meet with a consular official from Mexico after his arrest for the June 1993 rape and murder of two teenage girls in Houston. The killings were linked to a gang initiation.

    Under the Vienna Convention, foreign nationals have a right to talk to consular officers after their arrests.

    Texas has acknowledged Medellin was never told he could talk to Mexican officials. But it has argued that claim cannot be made now because he never raised it at trial or sentencing.

    Even if his treaty rights had been violated, it would not have made any difference in the outcome of the case, Texas said.

    The ICJ, also known as the World Court, is responsible for handling disputes between U.N. member states. Its rulings -- which often take years -- are binding and not subject to appeal.

    Sandra Babcock from the Center for International Human Rights at Chicago University said the Mexicans only had a 1 percent chance of clemency, noting Texas had commuted just two of its more than 400 death sentences in the last few decades.

    The Mexicans are on death row in several other states as well as Texas, including California and Oklahoma.

    Gomez-Robledo, Mexican under-secretary for multilateral affairs and human rights, called Bush's efforts to get the cases reviewed "praiseworthy" and said U.S. authorities were doing more to respect the rights of arrested foreign nationals.

    But he appealed to the United States to respect international law. "The rule of law is the foundation stone on which the United States was built," he said.

    )

  2. #2
    Senior Member redpony353's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    4,883
    But he appealed to the United States to respect international law. "The rule of law is the foundation stone on which the United States was built," he said.
    YES THATS RIGHT....THE RULE OF LAW. IT IS AGAINST THE LAW IN THE UNITED STATES TO RAPE AND MURDER CHILDREN. PEOPLE WHO DO THIS WILL BE EXECUTED.....EVEN IF THEY ARE MEXICAN.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member joazinha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,576
    Crimes committed on AMERICAN soil are under AMERICAN NOT foreign jurisdiction! If YOU LOVE YOUR scumbag killer creeps SO MUCH, Mexico, it's TIME for YOU to TAKE them BACK with NO questions asked!!!

  4. #4
    Senior Member bigtex's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    3,362
    Fortunately for us, the World Court has no say in American affairs. Unfortunately Mexico and the World Court, the Supreme Court has already said neither can interfere win American law. Medellin and his pals will get what Texas justice has planned for them.
    Certified Member
    The Sons of the Republic of Texas

  5. #5
    Senior Member koobster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1,699
    And you know what really gets me, is that BUSH, went up and tried to get it overturned, did I hear that right?
    Well, at any time you rape and murder a child, you need the death sentance, and right away. This monster got to sit on death row for 15 years? What kind of crap is this? And mexico was mad about this from what I heard.
    But yet some illegal drug runner can illegally come into the USA to bring drugs, gets shot in the butt, and then gets a free pass, and gets to bring more drugs into the USA and mexcico demands that they prosecute the agents, and they get 10-12 years for protecting the border. And this drug runner gets to also sue the USA for "VIOLATION" of his "RIGHTS". Is there some thing wrong here, or is it just me???
    And what buisness is it of mexicos to get involed with the USA, buisness.
    Are they now running this country, sure looks like it to me.
    Proud to be an AMERICAN

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •