Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    526

    North American Union with Mexico and Canada NO!!

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=45830


    PREMEDITATED MERGER
    Resolution fights North American Union
    Urges U.S. to withdraw from Security and Prosperity Partnership


    Posted: February 01, 2008
    1:00 am Eastern
    By Jerome R. Corsi
    © 2008 WorldNetDaily.com


    Utah state Rep. Stephen Sandstrom
    A state lawmaker in Utah has introduced a resolution encouraging the U.S. to withdraw from the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and any other bilateral activity that would move the country toward an EU-style continental merger.
    Republican state Rep. Stephen Sandstrom introduced House Resolution 1 to the Utah legislature this week after a similar measure passed the House last year by a 47-24 vote but was blocked by a Senate committee just before the session's close.
    "I feel confident we will get this resolution passed this year," Sandstrom told WND. "We learned a lot last year about our opponents, and this year we are better prepared to anticipate their legislative moves to block us."
    The resolution reads in part: "The gradual creation of such a North American Union from a merger of the United States, Mexico and Canada would be a direct threat to the United States Constitution and the national independence of the United States and would imply an eventual end to national borders within North America."


    In a speech given in Salt Lake City to the Utah Eagle Forum's annual convention Jan. 19, Sandstrom compared the move toward a North American Union to the stealth methodology used by corporate elite to move Europe toward the European Union. The 50-year process began with the European Coal and Steel Agreement in 1957.
    "While the newspaper articles and reporters published the sequential events of European integration, most people in the European Community nations thought, 'Ho-hum ? no big deal,'" Sandstrom told the Eagle Forum meeting. "As a matter of fact, the Europeans continued to sleep like Gulliver until they were jolted awake when the euro replaced their national currencies."
    When the euro was introduced, Sandstrom explained, "fortunes were made and lost, savings were devalued, prices and commodities were suddenly revalued, borders essentially evaporated and individual countries could no longer control their own immigration laws.
    "Even their national flags ? for which their ancestors had fought and died ? were slowly being replaced by the flag of the European community, with its twelve golden stars on a blue background," he continued.
    "When that happened, many political leaders and vast numbers of usurped citizens wanted to stop the pan-European train and get off, but it was too late," he said. "Too late, because they were part and parcel of the European Union ? now and forever."
    Sandstrom explained he introduced H.R. 1 a second time because he wants to stop the forward movement of the Security and Prosperity Partnership into a North American market, following the European model in which economic integration inevitably led to political integration.
    "Just as in the European market decades ago," he told the Eagle Forum audience, "now there are both official and ad hoc forces here in the U.S. that continually press for further integration and harmonization at every opportunity."
    As evidence, Sandstrom cited the free flow of labor invited to the U.S. by the failure to secure the border with Mexico, the push by the Bush administration to expand NAFTA and CAFTA by a series of individual free trade agreements seeking to push open markets country by country ? first into Peru, followed by Columbia and Panama ? and the bureaucratic trilateral working groups seeking under SPP to integrate and harmonize U.S. administrative laws with those in Mexico and Canada.
    "We cannot and will not tolerate ? not without a fight ? the tearing down of 232 years of sovereign progress in which American has protected the etched-in-stone, under-God principles that were bequeathed to us by our founding fathers," he concluded.
    According to tabulation on StopTheNau.org, 13 states have now passed similar resolutions opposing the SPP and the movement toward a future North American Union.
    Utah is among six states considering a resolution against the SPP.
    As WND reported, Rep. Virgil Goode, R-Va., has introduced into the U.S. House of Representatives a resolution expressing congressional opposition to construction of a NAFTA super highway system or entry into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    15
    bbb

  3. #3
    Senior Member sawdust's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,268
    Sounds like a good deal, maybe Americans should move to Canada too. Why work when the Canadian government will support you. Better than staying here and working hard to support the illegals. A free 1 year vacation courtesy of the Candian taxpayers. We could all hang out at the casino in Windsor and gamble our money while the Canadian government supports us. I'm ready to go!

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by sawdust
    Sounds like a good deal, maybe Americans should move to Canada too. Why work when the Canadian government will support you. Better than staying here and working hard to support the illegals. A free 1 year vacation courtesy of the Candian taxpayers. We could all hang out at the casino in Windsor and gamble our money while the Canadian government supports us. I'm ready to go!
    I think that Canada is working hard to close the loophole. Mexicans don't particularly like cold weather and that's the only reason why Canada is not a mess like the United States. I think Canadians are smart enough to figure out that short term profits from illegals will cause long term damages to their economy and society.

  5. #5
    jazzloversinc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    442

    that is a great bill

    That is a GREAT BILL and we need to get behind it...can ALIPAC get the word out so we can call senators???

  6. #6
    Senior Member Catslave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    790
    Whats the number of the bill? Sponsors?
    PROMOTE SELF DEPORTATION, ENFORCE OUR
    LAWS!

  7. #7
    Senior Member carolinamtnwoman's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Asheville, Carolina del Norte
    Posts
    4,396

    Re: North American Union with Mexico and Canada NO!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Tex_2585_8538
    Rep. Virgil Goode, R-Va., has introduced into the U.S. House of Representatives a resolution expressing congressional opposition to construction of a NAFTA super highway system or entry into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada.
    H. CON. RES. 40

    http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtex ... l=hc110-40

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    594
    AMEN BROTHER!
    Unless we get those criminals & make them pay for what they have done to our country and the lawlessness they have sponsored, we are just another Mexico ourselves!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •