Thread: Price Waterhouse Coopers, NAU, WTO Asia and Mintz Levin

Currently the border debacle in the United States does nothing more than boost the frustration level of compliant American citizens as they watch their own once representative government sell their soveriegnty to hordes of Mexican Nationalists and Communist Invaders guided by corporate interests. This condition of interest comes straight from the desire to remove border restrictions and sovereign red tape for the beneift of WTO and Trans National Corporations profits. The process is widespread, well funded and well organized. For one of the first times, global corps have found an ally in communist and socialist activism, which has been funded/directed to attack the cultural blockades to globalism by empowering the nationalism of Mexican invaders, destroying American cultural connection to our history and sense of purpose and place, and creating a "movement" that is nurtured by corporate controlled media outlets.

Corporations have been pushing for the integration of Asia into the WTO, due to its lack of human labor laws, Asian governments willingness to utilize prison labor and child labor, low costs, corporate ownership of Asian political processes produce tangible results, and easy corruption of Asian enterprises. In point of fact, the current desire is to push for small and medium enterprise development in Asia because it benefits their ease of control and manipulation, but also it provides the basis for an argument to reduce tarrifs and trade barriers. Which is in fact the main goal of the globalists. The small and medium enterprise the use quite manipulatively to press for trade tarrif and border restriction reductions, because they say that it cripples development for these entities. The constant pitch from pro-globalists is that borders and tarrifs stifle these enterprises. One not even need list the tens of thousand devestating effects this has on the economy that is simply supposed to consume these goods, with zero to no returns on the labor that created the goods! Just pure consumption. They want to be able to have the slave labor created goods land free of tarrif and move without restrictions to US markets. Borders seem to get in the way and thats where Mexico and cultural invasionism comes into play.

This is a complicated process that has been in play since W's daddy uttered his infmaous NWO comments, which was then well nurtured by Clinton and W. Besides the governmental funding of the process, there are massive corporate interests at play that fund this movement. One of the flagship entities for this destructive process is PricewaterhouseCoopers. They were monumental in pushing for and providing Corporate consultation for the development of the Trade Act of 2002 which allowed President Bush to have the authority to negotiate trade deals directly and prevent Congressional amendments. In a business sense it seems expedient and due to the massive corruption and low moral character of the American congress, preventing trade deals from becoming bloated pork barrel entities is an even greater perceived benefit. But the major problem is that the practice of fast tracking creates econmic streams that are then forcing unconstitutional infrastructure changes.

PricewaterhouseCoopers is a corporate juggernaut in facilitating the movement of illegal aliens into the US along with law firm Mintz Levin.

Here is a pdf printed from an archived version of a seminar they co-hosted:
http://www.aztlandestroyer.com/public/M ... rchive.pdf
The original link was here:
Link
A google of the event title returns this:
Google Search of event

Archive Invite:
LINK

Here is the source text from the pro open borders meeting:

Cross-Border Employee Immigration and Tax Issues Seminar-Mintz Levin to Co-host with PricewaterhouseCoopers

Mintz Levin is co-hosting with PricewaterhouseCoopers the seminar "Cross-Border Employee Immigration and Tax Issues" on January 29, 2004 at Mintz Levin's Boston office. Panelists will include Susan J. Cohen, Chair and founder of Mintz Levin's Immigration Section; Grant S. Sovern, Senior Associate in Mintz Levin's Immigration Section; Rick Murray, Mananging Director of PricewaterhouseCooper's, IAS Practice; and Julia Smye Rumsby, Mananging Director of PricewaterhouseCooper's, Global Visa Solutions Practice.

Wether you are a small business hiring a foreign national in the U.S., or a large global company with offices around the world, you and your employees face daunting issues related to immigration, taxation, benefits and related issues. Join our expert panelists in a lively discussion covering specific scenarios and providing practical solutions to these common (and not so common) concerns.

For more information, click here to view the invitation.

Mintz Levin has recently opened a 40,000 square foot office in San Diego:
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/busi ... wyers.html

The Boston law firm Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, which opened a San Diego office in 2006, also plans to relocate to the Gateway at Torrey Hills after signing a lease for almost 40,000 square feet, according to Grubb & Ellis/BRE Commercial.

The World Economic Forum on Latin America is being held in Cancun and being co-chaired by these individuals:
José Sergio Gabrielli de Azevedo, President and Chief Executive Officer, Petroleo Brasileiro Petrobras, Brazil
Alejandro Baillères, Chief Executive Officer, Grupo Nacional Provincial, Mexico
Samuel A. Dipiazza, Global CEO, PriceWaterhouseCoopers, USA
José Antonio Fernández Carbajal, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, FEMSA, Mexico
Guo Shuqing, Chairman, China Construction Bank, People's Republic of China

http://www.weforum.org/en/events/WorldE ... /index.htm

PricewaterhouseCoopers has beena zealot for the landing of Chinese goods in Mexico and driving them freely into inland ports in the US. On October 2005 Dr. Suthad Setboonsarg of PWC produced this revealing presentation:
http://www.unescap.org/tid/projects/gbd ... suthad.pdf

If the link is killed:
http://www.aztlandestroyer.com/public/g ... suthad.pdf

UNESCAP by the way is United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.

PricewaterhouseCoopers took advantage of 9-11 to create a massive propaganda campaign that desperately attempts to tie 3rd party security to expedited cargo delivery and the need for less border regulation into a viable package! They have championed the cause of privatizing US Border inspection security of cargo to a 3rd party and surmise that their proposal would allow for "green lanes" and fast tracks systems for those in compliance during a potential terror event. The problem here is not mentioned in the document, but it is the infrastructure to create these "green lanes" that there is a need for broder erasure and inspection.
http://www.aztlandestroyer.com/public/c ... -final.pdf
The argument they are making is that goods need a 3rd party security firm that rewards compliant businesses. Which in reality would allow for constant uninterrupted movement of goods and "workers" across the border, leaving a 3rd party to determine threats.

A lapdog for much of the push for an integrated North American Union is Ms. Deborah Meyers, Senior Analyst, Migration PolicyInstitute, Washington. She has helped to maintain relationships and associations with Various Mexican Consulate Generals and gave a speech in 2003 about a North American integration. The conclusion she states as an inhibitng factor is IDENTITY. Hence the rush towards disruption. Meyers is a close associatte of Luis Herrera-Lasso who will be in attendance to the upcoming World Economic Forum in Cancun. It is a cozy world in the land of oz.

This aritcle constantly mentions the NAU. The full text of her speech and Herrera's are now unavailable. But this overview from the Canadian Public Policy Forum is still around, tho' well hidden. They are both close associattes of PricewaterhouseCoopers CEO.
Here is the overview pdf:
http://www.aztlandestroyer.com/public/n ... _final.pdf

Google archive Link:
www.ppforum.ca/common/assets/publications/en/na_outcomes_final.pdf+Luis_Herrera-Lasso_pres&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us]Search Link[/url]

Enjoy.

Chosen - thanks for posting this.

A related story on the general theme above...


About a year ago, I had a distant family member that worked for PWC in an accounting position. We had a discussion about PWC's human resource/hiring policies one day. She explained that she was working with several people in her local office from 'outside the country'. Having some first-hand experience in working with non-nationals, and having a fairly keen sense of the terms / modus operandi of 'worker importation' of large companies, I asked the obvious question(s) (the 'Q's are me in the below exchange):

Q. "So, why does your company hire these people? You mean you couldn't find any Americans to do these jobs"
A. "Well, no. We just brought these people in from outside the country".

Q. "Why?"
A. "Because these people were qualified, and they transferred into these positions".

Q. "'Transferred in', what does that mean?"
[knowing full well what the answer would be]
A. "They worked for the company over in <African, European nations>, but were transferred in under an L-1 visa. The company can pay them less".

Q. "Oh, I see. So, it's really not about the skills of the employee, but about getting people who will work cheaper?"
A. "Ah, well, erg, ah......<no answer>"

I got up from the table and walked away without saying another word.

....She quit the company a few months later. Maybe partly due to my obvious criticism of colluding with exploitative multinational (which has parent ownership in the UK for those onlooking here), but maybe also to having a glimmer of a look into what the future might look like...when her job is the one slated for "transference'.


I don't like multinational corporations and probably never will.

Yes that's great. That illuminates the simple power global corps have in affecting the workforce. "Transferring" seems to be the backdoor thats never had a door, it has just been an entry parlor. Multinational corps are not answerable to the public of the country in which they are profiting.

Businesses know that the new "immigrant" is simply happy to do a job and will take whatever comes their way. Across the lake here in Seattle, google has begun to expand in Kirkland. I have a friend who works in management in human resources/recruiting and he tells me they recruit from major math/engineering universities (ie UT Austin, UW) and simply look for ethnic names (mainly Asian) in the graduating class. They put them in a paid intern position, milk them for their contributions and then put them on the path to full time. He states it is purely a game of economics, they capitalize on the foreign exchange students desires to work in America which allows them to recruit at substantially cheaper rates than an "established" (his words) American. This is a practice Microsoft has pioneered and actually sells consultation on the strategy to hire foreign nationals.

I thank you, too, for posting this.

Wanted to note here of PWC's current involvement in the World Economic Forum.

As stated above, they are a major player in causing much of the business side of our open borders problems.

Web Page

It is very important to note how the global corps are taking advantage of the current crisis to lay out their trade barrier free agenda.