Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
07-13-2007, 02:50 PM #1
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 1,009
Rep. Tancredo's opposition to the NAU and SPP
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=50657
THE NEW WORLD DISORDER
Tancredo confronts
'super-state' effort
Demands full disclosure of White House work with Mexico, Canada
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: June 15, 2006
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2006 WorldNetDaily.com
Responding to a WorldNetDaily report, Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., is demanding the Bush administration fully disclose the activities of an office implementing a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada that apparently could lead to a North American union, despite having no authorization from Congress.
As WND reported, the White House has established working groups, under the North American Free Trade Agreement office in the Department of Commerce, to implement the Security and Prosperity Partnership, or SPP, signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005.
The groups, however, have no authorization from Congress and have not disclosed the results of their work despite two years of massive effort within the executive branches of the U.S., Mexico and Canada.
Tancredo wants to know the membership of the SPP groups along with their various trilateral memoranda of understanding and other agreements reached with counterparts in Mexico and Canada.
Tancredo's decision has been endorsed by Jim Gilchrist, founder of the Minuteman Project.
"It's time for the Bush administration to come clean," Gilchrist told WND. "If President Bush's agenda is to establish a new North American union government to supersede the sovereignty of the United States, then the president has an obligation to tell this to the American people directly. The American public has a right to know."
Geri Word, who heads the SPP office, told WND the work had not been disclosed because, "We did not want to get the contact people of the working groups distracted by calls from the public."
WND can find no specific congressional legislation authorizing the SPP working groups nor any congressional committees taking charge of oversight.
Many SPP working groups appear to be working toward achieving specific objectives as defined by a May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force report, which presented a blueprint for expanding the SPP agreement into a North American union that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a new governmental form.
-
07-13-2007, 03:11 PM #2
Geri Word, who heads the SPP office, told WND the work had not been disclosed because, "We did not want to get the contact people of the working groups distracted by calls from the public."
Again here we go with the Elitist attitudes. They don't want to be distracted by the public? What flavor kool-aid are they drinking because I sure would like a glass.
This reminds me of how some of the senators reacted to all the faxes, phone calls and e-mails regarding the FAILED immigration bill. It was like how dare these peasants bother me.
-
07-13-2007, 04:02 PM #3
They are PUBLIC SERVANTS and they better get that through their heads.
Three cheers for Tancredo for telling them like it is. This is treason!Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
07-13-2007, 06:23 PM #4
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Location
- Ron Paul Land
- Posts
- 1,038
IF Bush can be linked to this, and because of the LINK it can be shown that he left the BORDERS deliberately unattended --- then couldn't he be put on charges of treason?
RON PAUL, like Tancredo, is wise to all of this and is pushing full force to stop it.
Bill Melugin: Border Patrol Apprehends 2,000 Illegal Aliens in...
04-25-2024, 07:51 PM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports