Thread: Ron Paul wants border security now

But - he really ticked off a lot of people with it (libertarians). Now they're saying he's pandering to conservative republicans.

Originally Posted by NOamNASTY

.

Saudi Arabia just beheaded it's second subject this year ,it's just Jan . Last year it as 138 public beheadings . Any group od citizens who would want to watch this is not created by Americans . I don't agree with irag, but think the Sauds should have been taken out if anyone . Of course this will never happen .

You might not agree with the way Ron present' his foreign policy case, but you're actually arguing his points.

Saudi Arabia is our ally. You want to bomb our allies? You want to attack people who haven't attacked us? You're making Ron's case, in that we should not be involved in the screwy politics of a culture that's older than almost all others. We simply cannot afford to, nor do we have the moral authority to, be the police of the world,

China kills far more Tibetans every year. Should we invade China to save some of the most gentle people on earth?

Originally Posted by AngelaTC

Originally Posted by NOamNASTY

.

Saudi Arabia just beheaded it's second subject this year ,it's just Jan . Last year it as 138 public beheadings . Any group od citizens who would want to watch this is not created by Americans . I don't agree with irag, but think the Sauds should have been taken out if anyone . Of course this will never happen .

You might not agree with the way Ron present' his foreign policy case, but you're actually arguing his points.

Saudi Arabia is our ally. You want to bomb our allies? You want to attack people who haven't attacked us? You're making Ron's case, in that we should not be involved in the screwy politics of a culture that's older than almost all others. We simply cannot afford to, nor do we have the moral authority to, be the police of the world,

China kills far more Tibetans every year. Should we invade China to save some of the most gentle people on earth?

I said if we were going to attack anyone it should have been the place that breeds the ones who attacked us . The headhackers of the world [ 14 of the 911 were saudis ] !

Now Paul can blame us for all the things these demons do, but he can't blame us for what they did long before Chris Columbo got lost !

Wonder why they attacked us when that skirt stainer was in office he gave them a couple nations by bombing the heck out of the Serbs .

I don't see why Paul has to blame America for terror attacks when this is what they do the best ,not help their people or their nations, but help themselves to all the money while their citizens starve . You don't see any imans blowing up their own ass's ! They live in luxuary and love the hell out of life, while they teach the hungry to love death .

If Paul thinks some of our leaders were involved, he should go after them, not praise a bunch of our enemies .

Ron Paul did not blame Americans for 9/11 but our government has been involved in helping people get into power who have treated their citizens horrible.Marcos in the phillipeans,Shah of Iran,even Hussein and many others.

Do you know the poison gas used on the Iranian people came from the USA ? Do you see why they might be a little angry for our part in their misery ?

Ron Paul wants to try and make things safer for Americans around the world and working toward mutual understandings and stop meddling in their business unless it effcts us is a good beginning in my opinion.

We have a world organization who watches what is going on and works to stop atrocities around the Globe called the UN.Let them take the lead dealing with other countries and let the USA mend fences with our world neighbors.

We MUST secure the border at ALL COSTS, EVEN if we have to MILITARIZE it!

Originally Posted by joazinha

We MUST secure the border at ALL COSTS, EVEN if we have to MILITARIZE it!

A huge increase in troops is happening at Ft. Bliss in El Paso Texas.
Perhaps that means something

Originally Posted by vegasvic

Originally Posted by joazinha

We MUST secure the border at ALL COSTS, EVEN if we have to MILITARIZE it!

A huge increase in troops is happening at Ft. Bliss in El Paso Texas.
Perhaps that means something

There is probably a different reason for that increase at Ft. Bliss, but perhaps you are right.

At least, I hope you are. Id rather have troops on the border rather than just a wall.

Give people 3 months to get out of the country, and over that period just use rubber bullets for people trying to illegally cross the border.

MOD EDIT

its not inhuman - you still have legal immigration, we are simply protecting our sovereignty and our borders from invasion.

Doubtful, but any increase in troops along the border is good IMO. (as long as they are US troops)

Ron Paul never blamed the American people for 911. He specifically said that had our government not been meddling in middle easter affairs all these years, the terrorists wouldn't have done this. It doesn't make it right what the terrorists did, but this government needs to stop policing the world and tend to its own business right here at home.

Ron Paul never said he blamed the American people or our military. he blames FAILED FOREIGN POLICY for getting into foreign entanglements. He believes we should talk to people, visit and trade with them, just dont' get involved politically which we do ALL the time. The Founding Fathers said that. Don't you agree with the Founding Fathers???

Originally Posted by theclassics

Ron Paul never said he blamed the American people or our military. he blames FAILED FOREIGN POLICY for getting into foreign entanglements. He believes we should talk to people, visit and trade with them, just dont' get involved politically which we do ALL the time. The Founding Fathers said that. Don't you agree with the Founding Fathers???

I think things are a bit different now than they were back then , besides
even from the days of the founders we have been
involved in stuff all over the world