Thread: TREASON IN BENGHAZI – MY THEORY
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
- 12-24-2012, 05:14 AM #1
- Join Date
- May 2007
- South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
TREASON IN BENGHAZI – MY THEORY
TREASON IN BENGHAZI – MY THEORY
December 8, 2012 by ppjg
Liberty News Online
Back In August of 2012, there were reports in the national media that President Mohamed Morsi, the new President of Egypt had requested that the Obama administration release the Blind Sheik, Omar Abdel Rahman, the convicted mastermind behind the 1993 World Trade Center Terrorist attack, as a sign of good faith.
The story persisted for a couple of weeks but gradually faded as the national media lost interest and the Obama administration denied that they were talking to anyone about releasing him.
I have a theory that there was some truth to the story, but when it was somehow leaked out to the public, the Obama administration circled the wagons and with the usual cooperation of the main stream media, the story was killed and no one paid any attention to it anymore.
I believe there is a strong possibility that there is a connection between the rumors about releasing the Blind Sheik and the Terrorist Attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012. The information comes from confidential sources, congressional hearings and the stories in the press. Defenders of the President and his administration, including his allies in the national media (sometimes called the 5th column) will lash out and call what I am detailing here, just another “conspiracy theory.”
But consider this. The President of the United States, for over three months, has repeatedly lied about what happened at Benghazi, still refuses to tell the truth and avoids answering any questions about what he and his national security advisors did while watching the whole terrorist incident on closed circuit TV .
Because of this lack for truthfulness on the part of the president and his administration, my theory is a lot more plausible than the President’s lies.
If my theory proves to be true, it will clarify the reasons for the strange behavior of President Obama, the Secretary of State and other high ranking officials of the Obama administration, along with the reasons for the severe reduction of the number of security personnel assigned to the consulate, the “stand down” orders to the military and CIA, as well as blaming that stupid video about Mohammed for the attack that hardly anyone had even seen. It may also help explain why David Petreaus, the head of the Central Intelligence Agency, was forced to resign only days before he was to testify before congress at the Benghazi Committee hearings. If only some aspects of my theory are proven to be true, it may be grounds for impeachment of the President and/or his prosecution for treason.
According to confidential sources within the State Department and the CIA, there was an intercepted communications received from the Muslim Brotherhood, which indicated that operatives within the Obama administration, with the president’s full knowledge and approval, “staged” the attack in Benghazi in order to create a monumental “October Surprise” that would guarantee his re-election.
We know from White House visitor records that President Obama and selected staff members have personally met with members of the Muslim Brotherhood at the White House on several occasions during 2012. I believe that as a result of some of those meetings, a secret plan was developed with the help of the Muslim Brotherhood to secretly engineer the release of the “Blind Sheik,” Omar Abdel Rahman. Unfortunately for the Obama administration, when a portion of the plan leaked out, as I said earlier, it was quickly killed by the national media.
As part of this October Surprise plan, Obama administration officials were instructed to intentionally deny the repeated requests for additional security at the Benghazi consulate, so that almost no security would be available to protect Ambassador Chris Stevens who would then be kidnapped, and held for ransom by Al-Qaeda or a similar group controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood. Then, several days before the November election, the plan was to trade Chris Stevens for the Blind Sheik, making President Obama look like a hero, and all but guaranteeing his re-election.
I believe that this was one of the main reasons President Obama was so insistent that the Egyptian government, controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood, get $1.2 Billion in U.S. Aid. They were to be rewarded for having provided assistance in getting Barack Obama re-elected. That is why, even though the Obama Administration, including the State Department, knew days before the attack that it was going to occur, that no effort was made to bolster security. It was intended to be non-existent. The Libyan security forces were supposed to quietly slip away into the night when the attack began. And they did, just as planned.
There were two C-130U gunships, (which were built SPECIFICALLY for this kind of attack, and which could have saved the lives of our people there) a mere 45 minutes away, but they were never scrambled at any time during the attack. That is because there was to be no resistance whatsoever. That was the plan. Confidential sources reported that there was not one, but two drones flying over the consulate during the terrorist attack, at least one of which was armed. Our ex-Navy Seal/ CIA operatives on the ground were painting targets because they knew air cover was available from at least one of the drones.
Even though these brave Americans at the consulate requested air support and backup three times, their requests were NOT ignored, but they were intentionally, specifically DENIED three times, and even they were told to “stand down, ” which basically means to “surrender.” That was a crucial part of the plan. They were not to fight back because that would potentially undermine the kidnapping effort and cause unnecessary “complications” for both the terrorist attackers and the Obama administration.
The ex-Navy Seals/CIA operatives were on the ground, providing real-time reports to the White House, the State Department, National Security personnel and the U.S. Military. These brave Americans were “lighting up” the location of the mortars that were firing on the compound with lasers, but no gunships or support ever came, because they weren’t supposed to resist. That wasn’t “part of the plan.” It also wasn’t part of the plan for the CIA operatives to intentionally defy orders, recover the body of Sean Smith and then stand up against additional orders and directly engage the enemy terrorists who were attacking American soil.
It was supposed to be a “clean” quick, efficient kidnapping of the Ambassador and get out. Then the President would negotiate a deal and Save the Day in the “nick of time” just before the election. Unfortunately, the metro-sexual pinheads and academics in the Obama administration didn’t take into consideration the determination and sheer guts of a tiny group of highly trained ex-Navy Seals/CIA operatives.
Even though they eventually lost their lives in the firefight, these brave men, who were greatly outnumbered, managed to employ the full measure of their skills, and took out approximately 80 terrorist attackers in the process… which in turn enraged the attackers, who were led to believe that they would encounter no resistance. That is probably the reason why Ambassador Stevens was murdered and dragged through the streets.
In their warped minds, the terrorists and the Muslim Brotherhood believed that they had been betrayed by the U.S. yet again. They believed that they were going to get their beloved Blind Sheik back. And yet, there were 80 of their own… dead by American hands.
President Obama has been asked in interview after interview if he denied the request of these brave Americans for assistance during the attack and he has thus far refused to answer, and instead has talked about the incident “being investigated” and promising to “bring those responsible to justice.”
My God, he watched the attack on TV and did nothing. Why didn’t he do something, anything?
He went to bed, got up the next morning, gave a short speech in the Rose Garden and then went on the campaign trail like nothing had happened. Here we are in December, and he still refuses to address the issue with the American people.
The American press remains quiet on the subject. The reporters are afraid to ask the president any questions on Benghazi for fear that they will lose their seat in the White House press corps.
I believe that former CIA and State Dept. personnel will be coming forth soon with damning evidence that will indict President Obama and White House staff members and hopefully reveal the truth about what really happened in Benghazi on September 11, 2012.
Why did the President and his administration initially use The “Mohammed Video” as the cause of the so-called “Spontaneous Attack?”
It was because the “Video” was part of the carefully crafted plan developed weeks in advance of the actual attack that was designed to explain the random nature of a mob attack on a consulate and the kidnapping of the Ambassador.
Unfortunately for the President and the other White House conspirators, a couple of brave ex-Navy Seals named Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, stood their ground and their bravery may well bring down this presidency.
Well, this is my theory. It’s not perfect, but it is a lot better than President Obama’s non-explanation and outright lies.
Ref Article: TREASON IN BENGHAZI - MY THEORY
TREASON IN BENGHAZI – MY THEORY « The PPJ GazetteAmnesty for 11 million will increase debt by $6.3 trillion And that doesn't count costs of 22 million additional legal immigrants in just 10 years!
A Nation of of 3rd World Broke A@@es "AmeriKa" cannot afford an Invasion of Broke A@@es from the 3rd World