Thread: Voter Fraud Confirmed In Sutton NH

NH Voter Fraud CONFIRMED
Posted January 9th, 2008 by ruthindeed
New Hampshire District Admits Ron Paul Vote Skew
Sutton township reported Congressman had zero votes, actual number was 31

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, January 9, 2008

The head clerk of the New Hampshire town of Sutton has been forced to admit that Ron Paul received 31 votes yet when the final amount was transferred to a summary sheet and sent out to the media, the total was listed as zero. The fiasco throws the entire primary into doubt and could lead to a re-count.

As we reported earlier today, an entire family voted for Ron Paul in Sutton, yet when the voting map on the Politico website was posted, the total votes for Ron Paul were zero.

Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming "human error" was responsible for the mistake.

Two or three votes not counted could be a plausible mistake - but 31 votes for one candidate?

"The classic method for rigging a hand count is to write the wrong number on the form," Harris told the Alex Jones Show.

"They are counting everything in public real nice, they fill out a form in public real nice and then they transfer it to another form and they call that a summary sheet and then that is the one they send in," explained Harris.

"What happened is she said they did not transfer the number correctly and put zero instead of 31 - that is unacceptable as an answer."

With 100% of precincts now reporting, the map originally listed zero votes for Ron Paul as you can see below. It has now been updated to reflect the 31 votes Paul actually received.

The remainder of the 31 people in Sutton who voted for Ron Paul need to go public immediately with the charge of vote fraud and make it known that they were cheated out of their right to vote.

Harris estimates that it could cost the Ron Paul campaign as much as $67,000 dollars for a recount, but such a move could throw the entire primary into doubt, especially in light of the fact that Barack Obama appears to have been cheated out of a win by Hillary Clinton.

http://www.dailypaul.com/node/23647

If you think this is bad wait until over a million illegals vote in
Los Angeles or Chicago

And they will

"Harris estimates that it could cost the Ron Paul campaign as much as $67,000 dollars for a recount, but such a move could throw the entire primary into doubt, especially in light of the fact that Barack Obama appears to have been cheated out of a win by Hillary Clinton."

And, maybe Romney as well by McCain.

You can't deny that this does throw the whole thing into doubt

So, does anybody think you're vote is going to count when it gets to your state?

Why does Ron Paul have to pay for their "human error"? I think that's wrong.

Originally Posted by usanevada

If you think this is bad wait until over a million illegals vote in
Los Angeles or Chicago

And they will

THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT MCCAIN AND HILLARY ARE COUNTING ON!

OUR VOTING SYSTEM SUCKS.

THERE IS FRAUD EVERYWHERE. ILLEGAL ALIENS ARE BEING PAID BY GROUPS LIKE LARAZA TO FOLLOW THE VOTE FROM STATE TO STATE. ALL THEY NEED IS THIER PHONEY SS #'S, SOME BOGUS LICENSES, A FREAKING UTILITY BILL, OR A FAKE GREEN CARD. ALSO THEY MUST HAVE OVER 10 ALIASES WITH BOGUS INFORMATION. SOMETIMES EVEN MATRICULAR MEXICAN MICKY MOUSE CARDS. ANYTHING THAT LOOKS ALMOST OFFICIAL TO STUPID PEOPLE WORKING AT VOTING POLLS.

"What happened is she said they did not transfer the number correctly and put zero instead of 31 - that is unacceptable as an answer."

She did it, I think she should be charged with voter fraud. Should we believe it was only 31 votes she didn't count? Wonder how many other un-American criminals did the same thing.

Makes you wonder how many other towns did this in NH and Iowa, doesn't it?