Thread: Immigration battle is moving to states

June 30, 2007, 1:24AM
Houston Chronicle
Immigration battle is moving to states
Local laws could widely vary from punishment to 'sanctuary cities'

By DAVE MONTGOMERY
McClatchy-Tribune

Washington-The collapse of congressional efforts to overhaul the nation's immigration laws is expected to dramatically accelerate an effort by state and local governments to take matters into their own hands to deal with the nation's 12 million illegal immigrants.

The result, advocates on both sides of the issue say, could be a patchwork of laws and ordinances with vastly different approaches, ranging from measures harshly penalizing illegal immigrants and their employers to the spread of "sanctuary cities" that prohibit police from questioning suspects about their immigration status.

"There's going to be a barrage of local laws dealing with immigration policy," said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., a leading sponsor of a White House-backed immigration bill that stalled in the Senate this week. "In some areas of the country, it will be sanctuary. In other areas of the country, if you look at someone who looks illegal, you can lose your business license."

Senators voted 46-53 against a procedural motion Thursday to move toward a final vote on the bill, effectively killing — at least for now — a years-long push to repair what's long been assailed as a broken immigration system. The outcome dealt an embarrassing defeat to President Bush, who's made overhauling immigration law his top domestic priority.

Frustrated over what they perceive as federal foot-dragging, state and local governments already have been stepping up with remedies, a trend that's almost certain to escalate in the void Congress left.

"If Congress is going to abdicate its responsibilities, then states and cities are going to jump in," said John Gay, the senior vice president of the National Restaurant Association and the leader of a business coalition that backed the failed Senate bill. "One of the arguments for opposing state and local proposals is that Congress is addressing it. We don't have that anymore."

As of April, state legislators in all 50 states had introduced at least 1,169 bills and resolutions on immigration this year, more than twice the number introduced last year, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Many fell by the wayside but others made their way into law, underscoring the public's growing intolerance of federal inaction.

Oklahoma lawmakers recently enacted a law that cuts off illegal immigrants' access to driver's licenses and many government benefits. A six-month-old Colorado law prevents employers from hiring illegal immigrants and requires them to affirm the legal status of employees.

Cities and towns also have gotten into the act. Farmers Branch, a Dallas suburb, drew national attention by enacting an ordinance that bans landlords from renting to illegal immigrants; the ban is being challenged in court. The town council of another Texas community — Oak Point, northwest of Dallas — narrowly approved a resolution declaring English the official language.

Other states and municipalities have displayed a more welcoming atmosphere. In the Cuban-American stronghold of South Florida, two cities and Miami-Dade County have embraced resolutions calling on the federal government to stop deporting undocumented immigrants.

Thirty-two cities and counties in 16 states — including Houston, San Francisco, Austin and Seattle — have adopted "sanctuary policies" protective of undocumented immigrants, according to the Congressional Research Service, a division of the Library of Congress.

With congressional leaders predicting that there'll be no federal action on immigration at least through the rest of Bush's presidency, conservative lawmakers in more than half the states are readying legislation to crack down on illegal immigration and enable local officers to enforce immigration laws.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/4933856.html

What I want to know is since the BUSH administration and other 'factions' within the government are not pushing for this.. why can't TEXAS and other southern states request AID from all of the other states.. and then just build the wall themselves.. and hire their own guards or put their own national guard on it..

I mean, here we are afterwards and has the BUSH team moved forward at all...on security.... Are they at the fence building again?

SO, bush wants to build a highway that is 3 football fields long going thru a few states in 3 years.. yet, he can't build a fence?

The fascination with illegals is beginning to wear off. Having a vistor of another culture for one day is indeed intriguing, but after a couple months you are ready to toss them and their ways out the door.

The wall was already approved in 2006. That still should go up as planned. We need to demand that the funds be released for the extra border security and the wall that Bush approved. Will that at least not be taken care of?
On this issue alone we need to start sending e-mails an calling our senators. This one has already been approved.

Every dat Gopher I have to live and watch them break laws and have babies. I just don't know what to do. It is so gut wrenching.

Originally Posted by gofer

The fascination with illegals is beginning to wear off. Having a vistor of another culture for one day is indeed intriguing, but after a couple months you are ready to toss them and their ways out the door.

Mother said...leave while they still want you there...