Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member American-ized's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Monroe County, New York
    Posts
    3,530

    Republicans Angered by Repeal of 'No Match' Rule

    Republicans Angered by Repeal of 'No Match' Rule

    Congressional Quarterly Homeland Security
    August 19, 2009 Wednesday
    By Rob Margetta, CQ Staff

    Congressional Republicans are decrying the Department of Homeland Security's decision to repeal its "no match" rule, a system to let employers know if their workers are ineligible to work in the United States.

    "No-match letters help employers who want to follow the law to identify employees that may be working in the U.S. illegally," said House Judiciary Committee ranking Republican Lamar Smith of Texas.

    "There are currently an estimated seven million illegal immigrants working in the U.S. Meanwhile, there are 12.7 million Americans looking for jobs.

    Citizen and legal immigrant workers should not have to compete with illegal immigrants for scarce jobs.

    By repealing the no-match rule, this administration is putting illegal immigrants before the best interests of the American people."

    The George W. Bush administration's no-match rule tasked the Social Security Administration with sending employers, employees and the self-employed letters when names or Social Security numbers on tax forms did not match the agency's files.

    The rule outlined actions that employers could take after receiving such letters.

    Homeland Security in July announced its intention to abandon the no-match rule, saying its leadership favors the "E-Verify" employee-checking system.

    A release from the department called attention to the fact that the rule has never been implemented -- it was held up in litigation shortly after its creation in 2007.

    "E-Verify is a smart, simple and effective tool that reflects our continued commitment to working with employers to maintain a legal workforce," Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said at the time.

    The department filed notice it was rescinding the rule in the Federal Register on Tuesday.

    That move drew the ire of some conservatives, including Sen. David Vitter, R-La., who proposed an amendment to the fiscal 2010 Homeland Security appropriations bill (S 129 prohibiting its funding from being used to change the no-match system. The Senate adopted the amendment by voice vote a day after Homeland Security announced its decision to abandon no-match. The bill is now awaiting conference committee action.

    "This filing by the Department of Homeland Security further exemplifies the need for my 'No Match' amendment to remain in the final DHS appropriations bill," Vitter said. "My amendment passed with unanimous support of my colleagues, signifying that members of Congress recognize the need for greater workplace enforcement measures, not less."

    Rob Margetta can be reached at rmargetta@cq.com

    http://www6.lexisnexis.com/publisher/En ... 04&start=5

  2. #2
    Senior Member draindog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    864
    wheres the outrage?!!! napalitano should be FIRED!

  3. #3
    Senior Member Ratbstard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Alien City-(formerly New York City)
    Posts
    12,611
    By repealing the no-match rule, this administration is putting illegal immigrants before the best interests of the American people."
    Why am I not surprised?
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    TEXAS - The Lone Star State
    Posts
    16,941
    Quote Originally Posted by Ratbstard
    By repealing the no-match rule, this administration is putting illegal immigrants before the best interests of the American people."
    Why am I not surprised?
    i give up on this administration. they SUCK

  5. #5
    Senior Member vmonkey56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Tarheel State
    Posts
    7,134
    Why didn't the Republicans do more during President Bush's days? The Chamber of Commerce remember is not for E-Verify. Why is this?
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  6. #6
    ELE
    ELE is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    5,660

    The Dems have betrayed the American people.

    Democrats= Communist

    Impeach Janet. All of the victims and/or their families of crimes perpetrated by illegals should file a class action suit against Janet.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  7. #7
    Senior Member Ratbstard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Alien City-(formerly New York City)
    Posts
    12,611

    Re: The Dems have betrayed the American people.

    Quote Originally Posted by ELE
    All of the victims and/or their families of crimes perpetrated by illegals should file a class action suit against Janet.
    That's an interesting idea!
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •