Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member CCUSA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    7,675

    Hazleton May Offer Evidence Of Illegal Immigrants'Impact

    http://www.thetimes-tribune.com/site/ne ... 6046&rfi=6


    Hazleton may offer evidence of illegal immigrants’ impact

    BY WADE MALCOLM
    STAFF WRITER
    03/01/2007
    Email to a friendPrinter-friendly
    A federal judge will allow Hazleton to present anecdotal and observational evidence of the financial drain illegal immigrants have on public services.


    U.S. District Judge James M. Munley’s ruling paves the way for city officials to state their rationale for adopting ordinances targeting illegal immigrants — an argument that could be key to city’s defense against several aspects of a lawsuit challenging the ordinances.

    While agreeing with the plaintiffs that the city has produced few hard facts supporting its claims, Judge Munley said witnesses can provide competent testimony “about what they have seen, heard and experienced, even when they cannot reduce that testimony to neat statistical categories.”

    Immigration law expert Kris Kobach, who is representing the city, said the ruling would allow Hazleton to show it did not irrationally overstep its authority by enacting the ordinances.

    The decision was one of few victories for the city handed down by Judge Munley on Wednesday in a rulings on several pre-trial motions.

    Lawyers for the plaintiffs — who say the city’s ordinances targeting illegal immigrants are unconstitutional and discriminatory — also sought to remove two of the city’s expert witnesses.

    Judge Munley denied that motion.

    The experts are expected to testify that Hazleton has been afflicted by street gangs comprised mostly of illegal immigrants and that illegal immigration depresses wages and the local economy.

    The city also sought to remove several plaintiffs and one expert witness from the case, but Judge Munley ruled against the city in those motions.

    Lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union, other advocacy groups and several private legal firms represent the plaintiffs, who are private residents and business organizations in the city who claim the ordinances violate state and federal laws and encroach on due process and equal protection rights in the Constitution.

    The trial is scheduled to start on March 12 the William J. Nealon Federal Building.

    THE ASSOCIATED PRESS contributed to this report.

    Contact the writer: wmalcolm@citizensvoice.com



    ©The Times-Tribune 2007
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member nittygritty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    3,251
    I sure do wish Court Tv would cover this, i would love to watch it!
    Build the dam fence post haste!

  3. #3
    Senior Member Beckyal's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,900
    The ACLU needs to lose their tax free status and they sure need to be removed from receiving donations for the federal combined campaign.
    Filing suits which are aginst the welfare of legal immigrants and US citizens is terrible. Time for them to be disbanded or at least have to pay taxes on all the money that they are receiving.

    I would like to see an audit of their donations to see who is paying the bill for being anti-american.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •