Thread: Calif. farmers unhappy with guestworker changes

Calif. farmers unhappy with guestworker changes
Submitted by SHNS on Wed, 04/30/2008 - 10:23. By Susan Ferriss, Sacramento Bee western news

Juan Carlos, 24, swiftly cut and gathered stalk after stalk of asparagus in a remote part of the San Joaquin Delta. He felt safe enough to admit that he is as fresh to California as the produce he harvests.

He only crossed the border from Mexico this year.

"Sure, I'd like to have a permit to come legally. That way there wouldn't be a need to walk through the desert and maybe die," he said in Spanish. "We could go home to our families after the work is done."

Carlos is referring to a permit under the guest worker program known as H-2A. Less than 1 percent of California's farmworkers are on H-2A visas. At peak season, up to 70 percent of the nearly half-million workers in the fields are undocumented.

The Bush administration, however, has promised to get tougher on illegal immigration and is trying to cajole American agribusiness to use the H-2A program instead of hiring undocumented workers. To that end, the administration in February proposed H-2A changes it ideally wants finalized by the end of summer.

The U.S. Labor Department, the agency that reviews H-2A petitions, says it aims to "modernize" the program, making it easier for employers while protecting better the rights of guest workers and U.S.-based laborers.

Labor unions and California farmers object, though, saying many changes would make the program worse.

"It's a Band-Aid on a laceration that's going to require a thousand stitches," said Manuel Cunha, a fruit farmer in Fresno.

The changes include: a new way to calculate wages for H-2A workers; increasing the fee of each worker visa from $10 to $100; and, under threat of higher penalties for lying, allowing businesses to "attest" they performed all obligatory steps to try to hire U.S. workers. Currently, they must file hard evidence of their attempts.

Other substantial changes are increasing advertising to recruit U.S. laborers, and lengthening the H-2A application deadline to no later than 75 days before workers would be needed instead of the current 45 days.

Another major change would allow employers to give H-2A workers housing vouchers to rent their own quarters instead of providing housing -- unless a governor proves a housing shortage exists in a state.

If California farmers were to switch to the H-2A program, the results would be profound for the state, which produces half of all U.S.-grown fresh fruits and vegetables and 20 percent of milk.

Labor advocates fear the wage change would depress wages for all farmworkers. Farm groups fear it could increase wages.

Farmers have long wanted the housing obligation dropped, but some acknowledge that California doesn't have enough rental space now to accommodate the workers who would be needed.

Cunha said he plans to use the H-2A program, but he said requiring growers to anticipate a need for workers 75 days before the date is unrealistic. He called the proposed $100 fee for each visa "so outlandish no one will want to use this."

In February, when officials unveiled proposed reforms to the program, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff expressed sympathy for employers because Congress had not passed earlier immigration changes that would have allowed some farmworkers to earn legal status. But he warned businesses that he intends to "continue to tighten the screws" on illegal immigration.

U.S. Department of Labor Secretary Elaine Chao said, "Unless changes are made to more accurately reflect today's economy, the labor challenges confronting U.S. agriculture would just continue to get worse."

http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/32743

There's a machine for just about everything. We can't afford to pay pickers $100 a day when farms in South America pay them less than five.

They can mount harvesting devices on tractors. I don't know why harvesting equipment needs to be made out of heavy steel, anymore: we're not talking about moving loads of crushed rock, FCO. I could see how harvesting equipment could be made out of aluminum, wood and plastic and sell for a fraction of what it does now.

China will probably manufacture some that is; and then we will import it through a Mexican port.
http://www.chinasuppliers.globalsources ... ipment.htm

I hate to say it but the farmers and people in the Central Valley have a different attitude. They are stuck in the last century. The air quality is terrible, everyone is suffering from allergies and asthma. Studies have shown that it is largely due to the farms/dairies, but they just keep getting excemptions.

If housing prices go up; blame it on the people moving in from the bay area. If it is harder to find jobs; blame it on the people moving from the bay area. If there is more crime blame it on the people from the bay area.

They have lived so long using legal and illegal immigrants labor that they will protect them at all costs and blame everyone else for their woes.

UC Davis has done studies on farm machinery and air quality, but all that is ignored to keep things the way they are.

China will probably manufacture some that is; and then we will import it through a Mexican port

Yea, but it would break down easily or be unsafe to the user!

China has produced a picker machine---that inserts lead onto the produce. After all, they must maintain their standards.

Can't help the sarcasm.