Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Brian503a's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    California or ground zero of the invasion
    Posts
    16,029

    Guest workers backed, but wage rule 'troubling'

    http://washingtontimes.com/national/200 ... -9190r.htm

    Guest workers backed, but wage rule 'troubling'
    By Charles Hurt
    THE WASHINGTON TIMES
    Published July 20, 2006

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pro-business advocates urged Congress yesterday to create a program for foreign "guest workers" but called some of the provisions in the Senate immigration bill "troubling."

    The Senate legislation, said Elizabeth C. Dickson of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to a House committee yesterday, "includes a number of requirements that are unclear, unnecessary or simply unwise, and we hope that should Congress move to enact a new temporary-worker program that these problems will be addressed."

    In particular, she said, there are concerns in the business community about provisions that would require foreign construction laborers here under a guest-worker program to be paid well above the minimum wage, even as American workers at the same site could earn less.

    The bill that passed the Senate in the spring would dramatically expand the Davis Bacon Act of 1931, which requires that a local prevailing wage be paid to all workers employed in federally contracted construction or projects done for the District. Those wages -- up to four or five times higher in some fields than the federal minimum wage of $5.15 per hour -- are set by the Department of Labor.

    The Senate's immigration bill would require that the higher wages be paid to foreign temporary workers in all construction occupations, even if the project isn't federally funded and doesn't otherwise fall under 1931 legislation.

    Despite flaws in the Senate bill, Ms. Dickson said a guest-worker program is needed. However, Jack Martin of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) warned that such a program would have negative effects on American workers.

    The increases proposed in just two categories of work visas, he said, would result in an immigrant work force that in six years could grow to 2.8 million -- more than double the 2004 level.

    "FAIR views the various current visa programs that allow aliens to work temporarily in the United States as excessive, poorly conceived, subject to abuse and in many ways unfair to the American worker," Mr. Martin told the House Education and the Workforce Committee yesterday. "It should also be clear that FAIR finds the expansion of foreign temporary-worker programs provided for in [the Senate bill] unwarranted and injurious to the American work force."

    Committee Chairman Rep. Howard P. "Buck" McKeon, California Republican, said the hearing provided evidence that the Senate bill requires further scrutiny by House.

    "Though there was disagreement among our witnesses about the value of guest-worker programs, there was a commonly held view that these programs need reform and a closer examination of a potential expansion of them is warranted," he said.
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member nittygritty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    3,251
    Quote,
    Despite flaws in the Senate bill, Ms. Dickson said a guest-worker program is needed. However, Jack Martin of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) warned that such a program would have negative effects on American workers.


    Negative effects my butt, there would be a riot I would think and rightly so!
    Build the dam fence post haste!

  3. #3
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,717
    The Senate legislation, said Elizabeth C. Dickson of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to a House committee yesterday, "includes a number of requirements that are unclear, unnecessary or simply unwise, and we hope that should Congress move to enact a new temporary-worker program that these problems will be addressed."

    In particular, she said, there are concerns in the business community about provisions that would require foreign construction laborers here under a guest-worker program to be paid well above the minimum wage, even as American workers at the same site could earn less.
    There it is in a nutshell, corporate Amercia GREED!

    Raising the pay for "guest workers" defeats the whole purpose of having "cheap labor." This reminds me of the old saying, "be careful for what you ask for, because you just might get it." Looks like the guest workers sort of lose their shiney luster when employers are forced to pay them well above minimum wage. This would almost be funny, if the whole issue wasn't so sad!

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •