August 30, 2007
Birthright citizenship in question again
http://blogs.chron.com/immigration/arch ... _citi.html
Who in Congress wants to end birthright citizenship? About 80 members of the House, it seems.

Rep. Nathan Deal, R-Ga., in April introduced House Bill 1940, which would restrict citizenship to babies with at least one parent who is a U.S. citizen, lawful permanent resident or member of the military.

To see the 79 co-sponsors (including a few from Texas) click here.

Proponents of birthright citizenship say it's a lure for illegal immigration, but supporters say changing it would mean tampering with the Constitution.

Deal was quoted recently in the Chattanooga Times Free Press as saying: ``Birthright citizenship is one of those things that has become a magnet for illegal immigrants to come over here.''

Birthright citizenship, as it is known, has been in force since the approval of the Constitution's 14th amendment in 1868. Some supporters of changing the law say the 14th amendment has been misinterpreted, and should not benefit the children of illegal immigrants.

There's also a birth right petition circulating on the Internet.

Advocates for immigrants warn of unintended consequences if birthright citizenship is abolished.

The ACLU came out against a Texas bill, HB 28, that would have banned the children of illegal immigrants from receiving some state benefits. On the ACLU Web site, it warns that ``restricting birthright citizenship will compromise the identity and character of Texas."