Thread: Obama vs. Arizona: The President is fighting a reckless war

Obama vs. Arizona: The President is fighting a reckless war that will backfire politically

Andrea Tantaros

Thursday, July 8th 2010, 4:00 AM
Related News

The Obama administration is getting quite the reputation for bucking the wishes of the people. From pushing through an unpopular health care bill to imposing a moratorium on offshore drilling that's costing the already-suffering gulf region precious jobs, it has refused to back down when it comes to the will of the masses.

Now, President Obama's Justice Department has decided to sue the State of Arizona over its new law targeting illegal aliens, when a majority of the public favors the legislation, leaving many to wonder if the increasingly detached White House has gone too far.

The administration says its lawsuit is all about the law; Arizona, it says, is trying to enforce immigration statutes - which is the federal government's job alone.

It's hard to believe from a President who has already shaken the finger of moral disapproval at the bill.

Rather, anyone with basic political sense can see the move for what it is: a purely political maneuver intended to invigorate Hispanic voters - a key piece of the Democratic base - in time for the November elections. Obama is hoping that a bloody judicial showdown on immigration will translate into high turnout for Democrats. And that could be enough to sustain Democratic majorities in Congress.

Don't count on it. For the strategy to work, registered Hispanic voters would need to turn out in droves over what essentially boils down to a nuanced debate between federal versus states' rights.

While some legal Latinos will buy the concern that the bill could lead to racial profiling - an outcome the Arizona law strictly forbids - most likely voters are overwhelmingly against illegal immigration. Even if some find the Arizona law abhorrent, it won't likely be enough to counter the majority of Americans who side with the Grand Canyon State and would favor a similar law in their own states.

According to a Pew Research Center poll conducted May 6 to 9, nearly six in 10 voters favor the Arizona legislation, the broadest support in favor of the requirement that people produce documents verifying their legal status. A whopping 86% of Republicans, 65% of Democrats and 73% of independents back that provision.

When it comes to immigration, most Americans want the border secured first and foremost. But securing the border would take the immediacy of the immigration issue off the table. You see, Obama needs the border as a carrot to pass a larger bill in Congress that gives amnesty.

Think about it. What sounds better: "The Protect Our Borders Now Act" or the "Amnesty for Everyone Bill"? Without serious provisions that address border security, any such legislation is unlikely to pass, particularly if the GOP gains seats in the fall or takes control of the House of Representatives, something Obama is expecting, with the help of Hispanics, not to happen.

And so, in an effort to maintain and expand the Democratic base, Obama risks support within it. A sharp divide among the unions could ensue as it did in 2007 during the last immigration fight if blue-collar workers believe Obama is favoring illegal aliens who take their jobs and refusing to stand up for the suffering American worker.

With unemployment hovering at almost 10%, a bitter battle between two levels of government is unprecedented and unnecessary. Voters want action on the economy, not more federal government overreaching. A very public power struggle between the President and one of the states in the Union is not likely to play well, especially because it's Washington that has dropped the ball when it comes to tackling the out-of-control issue of illegal immigration.

Declaring war on the State of Arizona is one thing. Declaring war on the State of Arizona while the economy is on the verge of bankruptcy and a double-dip recession is another. Restoring jobs and economic and national security should be the President's top concerns. If he doesn't change course, it'll be him who is on trial next in the court of public opinion.

andrea@andreatantaros.com

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/201 ... z0t6KS3mvk



I posted to the comment section:

AZ SB 1070 applies ONLY to AZ. It simply makes it illegal for any Law Enforcement Agency within that state to practice Sanctuary Policies. New York City should have been sued by the Feds in 88 when then mayor Koch proudly declared that NYC would NOT FOLLOW the 86 IRCA laws. Ask yourself why Koch felt he had to declare that if NYC didn't have the right to enforce the Fed Law?... EVERY STATE HAS THE RIGHT TO ENFORCE FEDERAL LAWS. WHAT STATES CANNOT DO IS ENACT LAW CONTRARY TO FEDERAL LAW. AZ SB1070 DOES NOT DO THAT. END OF STORY.

All the while sanctuary cites and states, who are actively breaking federal law, are allowed to peacefully go about their business.

Would it be better if local law enforcement agencies just cut ALL cooperation with the federal government to intercept criminals entering the US. Let the airport bombers, shoe bombers, Chinese and Russian spies, religious kooks, fraud rings, smuggling cartels, just roam free. NEVER USE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BECAUSE IT IS THE FED's JOB!!