Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    970

    Denver council opposes ballot measure on impounding cars

    Denver council opposes ballot measure on impounding cars

    The Denver City Council voted 10-1 Monday to oppose a ballot measure aimed at taking cars from illegal immigrants.

    Initiative 100 would require police to impound the car of any unlicensed driver who could not prove citizenship.

    The inclusion of the words "illegal alien" in the initiative struck many as unfair targeting of one specific group. Opponents say current law already prohibits driving without a license.

    "In 2007, there were 20,000 citations for charges related to driving without a license," said Paul Lopez, a council member and co-sponsor of the proclamation against Initiative 100. "To say there is a need for this initiative is untrue and ill-conceived."

    Jeanne Faatz, the only council member in favor of the initiative, said safety is the main issue, not illegal immigration. Two council members were absent.

    "Unlicensed drivers who get into accidents will be uninsured and are a tremendous safety hazard to our citizens," Faatz said.

    "A lot of people believe it's because the enforcement of our laws is more permissive, and we need to have teeth to get unlicensed drivers out of cars," she said.

    About 30 activists with We Believe Colorado, a coalition of faith groups, gathered outside the City and County Building before the council meeting to demonstrate against the initiative.

    "We are here to announce that together we are family," said the Rev. Janet Forbes of the Rocky Mountain Conference of the United Methodist Church.

    "People don't want to go left or right but deeper, and so we're here to shift the thinking and to say 'no' to Initiative 100."

    Chad Hagedorn watched the rally from the seat of his bicycle.

    "I think that the initiative is designed to attack undocumented immigrants," Hagedorn said. "It is pretty explicit in the writing and makes the law susceptible to racial profiling."

    Yet John Brick, spokesperson for the Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform, insisted the measure is aimed at all drivers, not just one group. Brick maintained the problem is a lack of enforcement.

    "I've heard police say that insurance for illegal aliens is 'get out and run,' and that's not going to help the victims of accidents," Brick said.


    porterc@RockyMountainNews.com or 303-954-5625


    What's at stake

    Voters will decide on Aug. 12 whether to pass Initiative 100. Here's what it would do:

    * The initiative would require police to impound the car of any driver found to be driving without a license.

    * The car would be impounded unless the driver could provide "convincing corroborating identification, vehicle registration, or a valid driver's license."

    * A driver with a foreign license who cannot prove he or she is in the country legally would have his or her car impounded.

    http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2 ... e-on-cars/

  2. #2
    Senior Member cvangel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    4,450
    Debate Over Impound Initiative Heating Up In Denver
    Area Clergy Rally In Opposition Of Proposal
    By Lance Hernandez, 7NEWS Reporter

    POSTED: 11:28 pm MDT July 28, 2008
    UPDATED: 1:00 am MDT July 29, 2008

    DENVER -- A new group called We Believe Colorado is gearing up to battle Initiative 100.

    That's the proposal that would mandate Denver police confiscate the vehicles of unlicensed drivers.

    Some Denver City Council members said I-100 unfairly targets illegal immigrants. Others said the measure is simply intended to make Denver streets safer.

    "Officers in my district have told me that up to four in 10 of the cars they stop are being driven by unlicensed drivers," said Councilwoman Jeanne Faatz.

    But Councilman Paul Lopez said there are already laws on the books prohibiting driving without a license.

    "I understand we have a broken immigration system," Lopez said. "But this is not the way to handle it. In the month of April (police) impounded 340 odd cars. Cars can be impounded for 19 separate reasons."

    The group behind I-100 told 7NEWS that the courts are backed up with drivers who've been ticketed for not having a license.

    "They pay a little fine then go right back out to their car and drive away," said Daniel Hayes of FutureDenver.com.

    Several clergy members who rallied against the proposal Monday evening said the measure is divisive.

    "It is one of the first steps toward defacing and dehumanizing an entire population," said Rev. Andrew Simpson, presiding Elder with the African Methodist Episcopal Church.

    "It's a step backwards, Simpson said. "It goes back to the day when racial and ethnic profiling was considered good public policy."

    Simpson added that the $2,500 bond required once the car is impounded, "is aimed at getting rid of certain people, not just trying to make the streets safer."

    Hayes disagrees.

    "Nobody's going to jail over this," he said. "It's simply a matter of taking their vehicle."

    Lopez said that if the proposal passes, police will have to spend more time waiting for a car to be towed when they should be out handling more important calls.

    Faatz said that making streets safer is the priority.

    "I feel that driving while unlicensed is a very serious offense," she said.

    http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/17 ... etail.html

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •