Thread: Gays push for partner immigration rights

Gays push for partner immigration rights

Matthew B. Stannard,Tyche Hendricks, Chronicle Staff Writer

Saturday, June 6, 2009

As Congress and immigrant advocacy groups gear up for the annual tussle over comprehensive immigration reform, a proposal by San Jose Rep. Mike Honda is opening up a new angle on the debate - one that some groups warn could overshadow years of effort at building consensus.

Honda's Reuniting Families Act, introduced Thursday, would extend to "permanent partners" the same naturalization rights accorded to spouses under the bill, allowing gay and lesbian Americans to seek legal residency for their immigrant same-sex partners.

"How do you define 'all families'? Traditional heterosexual families but also permanent partners, recognized as having a legitimate long-term relationship," Honda, a Democrat, said this week. "It's a civil rights issue. The idea of being on the outside looking in is something we're familiar with, it's un-American. ... I want to make sure we do the right thing the first time."

The proposal would address situations like that of Shirley Tan, a Pacifica mother who testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee this week. Committee Chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, introduced a similar bill this week in the Senate.

Tan, a housewife who lives with Jay Mercado, her registered domestic partner, and their 12-year-old twin sons - all citizens - faced deportation to the Philippines in April until that order was blocked by special legislation sponsored by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif. Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Hillsborough, had earlier obtained a three-week stay of the order.

"It was horrible - it was as if the world came down on me," Tan said by telephone Friday as she was visiting the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum with her family.

Were Tan and Mercado a heterosexual married couple, Tan would probably have been eligible for a green card. A survey commissioned in 2000 by Immigration Equality, a national organization fighting for equal immigration rights for the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and HIV-positive community, reported about 37,000 same-sex couples in the country where one partner was a foreign citizen.

"The thought of being separated from my family, my boys, because they're my life, my everything," Tan said. "There should be equality. This is what I believe America should stand for. ... Families shouldn't be torn apart."

Honda introduced his bill, which addresses a range of other immigration issues, in advance of a White House meeting on immigration policy, scheduled for June 17, to which President Obama is inviting congressional leaders from both parties. Hundreds of immigrant advocates converged on Washington this week to show support for comprehensive immigration reform, including legalization of undocumented immigrants and an increase in green cards for family-based immigration.

But Honda's proposal to extend to same-sex partners the legal residency rights now accorded to spouses has generated controversy within the coalition of groups seeking reform - with some of those groups warning the issue could fracture the movement.

"I do believe it could be a death knell," said the Rev. Samuel Rodriguez, president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference. "We won't support legislation - period - that includes the Honda same-sex component."

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops this week also criticized Honda's bill, saying that while it strongly supported reform to help reunify immigrant families, the conference strongly opposed efforts to "erode the institution of marriage and family by according marriage-like immigration benefits" to same-sex relationships.

Rodriguez insisted that the issue is not one solely of moral opposition, noting that while he opposes same-sex marriage, he also has spoken against homophobia in the church. But immigration reform is going to be tricky enough to sell in Congress, he said, without adding divisive issues.

"We already know that in order to pass comprehensive immigration reform, we need to engage some of the Blue Dog Democrats, some of the centrists and the moderates," he said. "If we add on the same-sex component, many of the Blue Dog Democrats are going to say absolutely not, we're not going to sign on." The Blue Dogs are a group of conservative Democrats.

Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies at the Center for Immigration Studies, which favors limited immigration, said Honda's proposal could also lead to increased fraud because same-sex couples don't have the same clear documentation - a marriage certificate - to prove to immigration officials that they have the relationship they claim.

"Our whole immigration system is based on documents," she said.

But Rachel Tiven, executive director of Immigration Equality, said the bill includes requirements for proving that a same-sex couple has a significant long-standing commitment, using financial documents, mortgages and wills - the kind of documentation she said businesses use when confirming eligibility for domestic partnership benefits.

Nor should the same-sex benefit scuttle the coalition building for immigration reform, Tiven said - in fact, she added, the addition of experienced grassroots activists from the LGBT community might more than make up for any allies lost over the issue.

"There are millions and millions of families that desperately need immigration reform," she said. "Some of those families are gay, most of those families are not, and I hope that people who really genuinely care about families and immigration reform will really act to protect families that need help."

E-mail the writers at mstannard@sfchronicle.com and thendricks@sfchronicle.com.

This article appeared on page A - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c ... 181S.DTL

Gender preference is not the issue............if a person is in our country illegally and/or has a partner that is an American, the illegal is still an illegal. If the couple wants to live in the home country of the illegal to be unified they can do so. The American people don't want to pay for any illegals and/or their extended familes.

PS
Additionally if a person is from another country and they are partnered with a legal American citizen, they have to go through legal channels like everyone else.