Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Brian503a's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    California or ground zero of the invasion
    Posts
    16,029

    English-only employers facing suits

    http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/journalgaz ... 163318.htm

    Posted on Mon, Nov. 14, 2005

    English-only employers facing suits

    By Miriam Jordan
    Wall Street Journal

    Hispanic employees at a Sephora store in New York say their ability to speak Spanish was crucial when they were selling lipstick and eye shadow to well-heeled Chilean and Argentine tourists. But they say that if they uttered any Spanish to each other, even in the lunch room, they were reprimanded by managers.

    As immigrants flock to the U.S. in record numbers, the nation’s workforce is becoming more multilingual. But some companies have responded by creating ad hoc language policies that can land them in court.

    That’s what happened to Sephora USA. Five employees filed a complaint against the division of luxury-goods maker LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 2003. The commission, in turn, filed a lawsuit on behalf of the five and a class of Hispanic employees in a Federal District Court in Manhattan.

    “This is the type of double standard we want to prevent,� EEOC attorney Raechel Adams says. “Hispanic employees are expected to speak Spanish with customers but at the same time are reprimanded for speaking Spanish in their free time.�

    Sephora says it “considers the EEOC’s allegations to be groundless.� It denies that it ever had “an ‘English-only’ rule,� but it says it does expect workers to speak English to customers unless the customer wishes otherwise. In September, a judge ruled that the company’s written policy on English usage is “permissible,� but the case is still pending on the issue of whether the employees were discriminated against when they were told not to speak Spanish.

    Cases involving English-only policies are mounting at the EEOC, the federal agency that enforces anti-discrimination laws in the workplace, as well as at private law firms across the country. Complaints filed with the agency jumped to 155 in 2004 from 32 in 1996. More grievances – they usually involve Spanish – are likely being handled by private attorneys. Still, most instances of language discrimination go unreported because employees fear retaliation, such as job loss, or, if they are illegal immigrants, even deportation.

    In the 2000 census, 47 million people – 18 percent of all U.S. residents – reported speaking a language other than English at home, up from 14 percent in 1990.

    To accommodate immigrants, many states offer driver’s license tests, hospital questionnaires and election ballots in foreign languages. Because of the increase in Spanish speakers, the U.S. Census Bureau is testing a bilingual questionnaire in preparation for the 2010 census.

    But amid a heated national debate over what to do with 11 million illegal immigrants, employers may be feeling emboldened to crack down on those who speak Spanish, in particular, lawyers and civil-rights advocates say. They also say that language discrimination cases are emerging in states that have long absorbed immigrants relatively successfully, such as New York and Texas, they say.

    Federal law doesn’t prevent employers from requiring workers to speak only English if it is justified by business necessity or safety concerns, such as work in a hospital surgery room or an air-traffic control tower. But an English-only rule can get an employer in trouble if it’s applied as a blanket policy, prohibiting workers from speaking another language during their breaks, for example, or when the language being spoken doesn’t make a difference in the performance of the job.

    Workers who feel they are being treated unfairly can file a complaint with the EEOC, which then chooses whether to investigate, mediate or litigate the case. If merited, the EEOC takes legal action based on Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which bans discrimination on the basis of national origin.

    “Employers must understand that discriminatory English-only rules can hurt productivity, morale and ultimately their bottom line,� says Kimberlie Ryan, a Denver attorney who is litigating several cases.

    But some businesses fear that English-speaking clients will feel alienated if too many employees speak a foreign language. Other companies worry that use of a foreign language by one group of workers can undermine overall morale by making other employees feel they are being slighted.

    Highland Hospital in Rochester, N.Y., asked its housekeeping staff to stick to English after it received complaints from several non-Spanish speaking workers who “were feeling ostracized by a group of Hispanic workers and (a) supervisor,� says Cindy Becker, the hospital’s chief executive officer.

    In July, the EEOC filed suit against the hospital and its owners on behalf of a group of Hispanic employees who say they were subjected to an English-only rule and disciplined for violating it. The suit seeks financial compensation for past humiliation and emotional distress.

    “No one can argue that these janitors needed English to sweep the floors,� says Sunu Chandy, an EEOC attorney.

    The hospital denies that it ever enforced an English-only policy. According to Becker, the Hispanic plaintiffs all speak English and were asked to communicate in a “common language.� But the EEOC maintains that most of the claimants have limited English proficiency. The workers, who are still employed by the hospital, won’t comment on the case while it’s in litigation.

    Groups concerned about preserving English object to multilingualism whether it’s practiced in offices or on assembly lines. They believe it threatens the dominance of English by tacitly encouraging newcomers to retain their own languages and to avoid assimilating into American society.

    “As this country becomes more diverse ethnically, it is even more important to have a common language than it was 50 years ago,� says K.C. McAlpin, executive director of ProEnglish, a group that lobbies to make English the official language of the U.S. The group is helping to finance the defense of at least two employers sued for insisting that English be spoken on the job.

    But Ryan, the Denver attorney, says: “This is not about whether people should learn English. It’s about not using language as a weapon of harassment.� She says a large number of her clients require psychological counseling because of the emotional distress they suffer.

    In March, Ryan reached a settlement with the Children’s Medical Center in Dallas and the food-services company Sodexho Inc. on behalf of eight cooks and cafeteria workers at the facility. According to the complaint filed in Federal District Court in Dallas, the employees were subjected to a no-Spanish rule and harassed by the managers who had imposed it.

    Juan Garrido, the lead plaintiff in the case, had been working at the facility for 18 months, preparing special meals for children with cancer, when a supervisor told him to speak only in English. When he declined, he says, he was warned that he was being “insubordinate.� He eventually received a written notice that deemed him “unprofessional� and “unethical� for speaking Spanish. But Garrido, who speaks broken English, says that communicating with workers who spoke only Spanish was essential. “We were making food for children with special diets,� he says in an interview.

    Ultimately, the Guatemalan immigrant says, only eight of the 32 Hispanic kitchen staffers decided to seek legal recourse. The rest feared reprisal. To comply with a confidentiality provision, the parties declined to disclose the size of the settlement.

    The hospital declined to comment. Garrido, 29, says he eventually quit his job at Children’s Medical Center because the stress he felt at work was undermining his health. He has since taken a job as a cook at another Dallas hospital. There, he says, there are no restrictions on Spanish usage by the Hispanic kitchen staff.
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    571
    She says a large number of her clients require psychological counseling because of the emotional distress they suffer.
    OH PLEASE! That's the biggest load of crap I've ever heard.

  3. #3
    Senior Member JohnB2012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    4,168
    Quote Originally Posted by nhantimassredrebel
    She says a large number of her clients require psychological counseling because of the emotional distress they suffer.
    OH PLEASE! That's the biggest load of crap I've ever heard.
    I agree.

  4. #4
    Senior Member JohnB2012's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    4,168

  5. #5
    BlueHills's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    356
    All symptoms of too much immigration and too much government intrusion into private affairs and business. And, if one does not wish to speak English, then one should not sneak into an English speaking country -- or even immigrate legally to one. Don't want to do as the Romans do, then stay out of Rome. The Romans would be better off without you anyway.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Rockfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    From FLA to GA as of 04/01/07
    Posts
    6,640
    Comming from someone who has been around spanish-speaking folk in the workplace for a long time (SFla). You can be with a spanish-speaking friend talking about something. Then someone else that speaks spanish will walk up and not only interrupt, but they will speak spanish instead of not interrupting and waiting to see what language is being spoken. Then, if spanish takes place, well, so be it. I'll wait long enough to see if whom I was talking to has the decency to say to their rude friend "..well, pardon me, but this friend of mine and I were having a conversation, please, excuse me while I continue". If that didn't happen, then I would know now there's someone I don't care to talk to anymore.

    Then there's the 'Ol Act Dumb' trick. You could be in a situation where you'd be trying to explain in Englsh something and the person you are talking to has a hard time understanding because they don't speak English. Then, they'd begin to pretend that they understand you. Every word that that they would speak after that would be JJYEESSS!

    Language differences build chaos and chaos can build resentment. People will always still speak the language of their choice. In the long run, it proves that multiculturalism does not work. Tolerance for legal foreigners who are obviously trying to assimilate to their best should be shown respect. I'm willing to bet anyone reading this would. But in the workplace, we are all between a rock and a hard place with language while trying to produce. For that reason, employers should be able to, not to discriminate, but to have a "common language" that everyone knows so that production can be at its best. Bilingualism is bogging us down!. If we are to be a formadable and competitive work force, this nation needs a common language throughout the work force. Damn if its gonna be spanish. American history is my culture, not somone's else's whose language is from another country. To not demand English means the surrender of our way of life. DEMAND ENGLISH!
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    571
    I had an interesting episode once in Providence, R.I. as an 18 year old smart a$$ that knew Spanish.

    A Puerto-Rican woman came up to me and said "?Habla Espanol?" I replied "Hablamos Ingles en Los Estados Unidos."

    Her boyfriend Pepe and about 12 other vatos kicked me to sleep. I'd do it again in a heartbeat though, just to see that look on her face one more time!

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Saxon Tree Goddess
    Posts
    1,073

    English speaking americans become second class citizens

    Speaking spanish around english-only anglo american citizens by illegal immigrants is just another power tool. 'when my daughter worked in a nursing home, the mexican women would gossip in spanish intentionally around the english speaking workers.
    Its interesting how quick the illegal mexicans or latinos, are so quick to file lawsuits , when most american born citizens never file suit against an employer even when there is cause.
    They are quite an aggressive group- I get the feeling they think they're doing us a favor to come here! when I complain about mexicans who have been here 4 or 8 years and still speak spanish- I am told that English is not the offical language of this country. I can see where that is heading ...

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    571
    It's good to know Spanish, though. All the ICE needs is stated evidence that somebody is here illegally to make a bust. Mexicans blabber about being here illegally in front of Anglos all the time under the presumption that we're too dumb to learn Spanish, which is laughable because their language is one of the easiest to master.

    If you work with alot of people who blabber in Espanol, learn their language and keep "playing dumb". Then, when Agent O'Malley, ICE shows up you can point out the illegals one by one.

    You could say "Ici, ici, ella, ella, y ella tambien. !Buenos tardes, putas!"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •