Thread: Tancredo Proposes Anti-Sharia Measure in Wake of U.K. Certif

Tancredo Proposes Anti-Sharia Measure in Wake of U.K. Certification of Islamic Courts
Friday, 19 September 2008

[size=150]“Jihad Prevention Actâ€

If what has happened in the U.K. isn’t proof positive of the imminent danger of unregulated, uncontrolled immigration policies that do not ensure assimilation of immigrants, then God help us, because I don’t know what is.

All nations are defined by their people. This is a no-brianer. Allowing the population balance of citizens to immigrants to tip too far in favor of the immigrants is surely a nation’s suicide.

We must insist that America’s immigration policy take into consideration the impact of immigration on Americans and the identity of this country, and adjust it accordingly. As we are now suffering the consequences of too many years of unbridled abuses to our immigration policy, we must now adjust it to not only drastically reduce the numbers we allow in, but must begin to remove those who never should have gotten in in the first place.

Now, someone tell me what needs be done to assist in the passage of Tom Tancredo’s Jihad Prevention Act?

This really ought to be on the homepage.

Taking a Lesson From Europe: http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2008/ ... eadfurther

Mr. Tancredo better be very, very careful in writing this bill as there will be an immediate outcry of violation of freedom of religion.
And we already have plenty of madrassas in this country teaching radical ideas, like Saudi Wahabbism which thoroughly embraces Sharia law and still carry it out in Saudi Arabia.
I honestly don't think the majority of American Muslims would not agree with that, or the rest of the non-Muslim population, but I get a severe hint that what the people think will matter at all, when there is another administration that embraces foreign influence for the sake of oil and money.

Sharia law, favored by Muslim extremists around the world, often calls for brutal punishment – such as the stoning of women who are accused of adultery or have children out of wedlock, cutting off the hands of petty thieves and lashings for the casual consumption of alcohol. Under Sharia law, a woman is often required to provide numerous witnesses to prove rape allegations against an assailant – a near impossible task.

Tancredo is right, we NEED to do this! We do not allow stoning, cutting off hands, lashings or rape in this country under ANY circumstances. I don't give a darn if your "religion" tells you it's ok!

Religious freedom is ok as long as it does NOT infringe on others. These criminal acts would infringe on EVERYONE.

What's next? Allowing children to be raped because it's ok in some cultures?!?! Human sacrifice in the name of "religious freedom"?

We can't hang the 10 commandments on a government building because it offends non-Chrisitians? BS! Sharia law offends ME!

[quote]Tancredo’s bill, dubbed the “Jihad Prevention Act,â€