Thread: Border Patrol shifting from voluntary return policy

January 01, 2009, 2:32 p.m.
Patrol shifting from voluntary return policy
ARTHUR H. ROTSTEIN
The Associated Press
The Border Patrol experienced a turning-point year in Arizona in 2008, with increased manpower, resources and technology bringing dramatic drops in illegal immigrant arrests, top officials say.

They're confident more is on the way in 2009, in part because of a continuing shift away from a policy under which most illegal immigrants are automatically allowed to return home after being apprehended sneaking across the border.

The heads of the patrol's Tucson and Yuma sectors cite the goal of eventually eliminating most voluntary repatriation as a significant step toward deterring illegal entries. They say it ensures that those who cross into the United States unlawfully will pay a price for doing so.

"My goal has always been to eliminate voluntary return," said Chief Robert Gilbert, head of the patrol's Tucson sector, which covers most of the Arizona-Mexico border. "I believe that's one of the keys to border security — that's through certainty of arrest and a penalty for the crime."

Programs aimed at adding consequences were increasingly part of the mix during 2008, when the patrol also added to its arsenal of agents, fences, barriers, roads, lights and cameras. The programs included prosecutions of some border-crossers for illegal entries and efforts that return migrants to the Mexican interior or to distant border communities to sever ties to their smugglers.

"We've been pretty successful in Yuma to ensure ... that if you enter the United States illegally, there will be a consequence," said Paul Beeson, chief of the Yuma sector, which covers the southwestern corner of Arizona.

During the 2008 fiscal year, 52,000 of the 317,000 illegal immigrants apprehended in the Tucson sector, or about one in six, were not voluntarily returned.

Isabel Garcia, Pima County legal defender and a longtime human rights activist, deplores the shift but isn't surprised.

"It's what we've been sounding the alarm about for over the last 10 years," she said, "that the enforcement would continue to increase dramatically, especially trying to eliminate voluntary return, knowing full well that it has horrendous consequences for immigrants."

Often, she said, they have spouses and children who are American citizens.

"Secondly and most importantly," she said, "is that the public must wonder out loud what $30 billion to $40 billion of `border security measures' have done for us. It's brought major insecurity, deaths, suffering, separation of families, destruction of private and environmental treasures, political chaos such that we have now elected some of the most anti-immigrant individuals in our history."

Apprehensions plunged in both the Tucson and Yuma sectors during the 2008 fiscal year when compared to the preceding 12 months.

Arrests dropped 16 percent, from 378,000 to 317,000, in the Tucson sector, the busiest region for illegal entries on the U.S.-Mexico border. They went down 78 percent, from 38,000 to 8,363, in the Yuma sector.

In the Tucson sector, historically more than 70 percent of those arrested in the most heavily trafficked areas southwest of Tucson re-entered the country.

It's what Gilbert called "a wicked cycle."

"They would just be sent back to Nogales and come back in, be sent back to Nogales and come back in," he said. "Eventually we don't catch them anymore. Either they went home or they were successful."

Now, the situation is different.

Increased lights, fencing, roads, sensors and mobile and remote camera surveillance systems, as well as 70 illegal entry prosecutions a day, have cut the recidivism rate in that area to less than 30 percent, Gilbert said.

Tucson began prosecutions in March with 40 a day, totaling 9,600 by the end of September. Yuma's prosecution program began more than a year earlier.

Both sectors also bring some of those arrested before immigration judges for administrative formal removal, typically for those who have overstayed visas.

In Tucson, nearly 10,000 others were processed through expedited removal — essentially removed without a hearing because they've entered illegally.

Among other programs, more than 18,600 people were flown to Mexico City; thousands were sent back, technically via voluntary returns, to such locations as El Paso and San Diego to keep them away from their smugglers. More than 12,000 people from countries other than Mexico were formally removed through U.S. immigration courts.
http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/daily/brea ... 106573.php

"It's what we've been sounding the alarm about for over the last 10 years," she said, "that the enforcement would continue to increase dramatically, especially trying to eliminate voluntary return, knowing full well that it has horrendous consequences for immigrants."

Often, she said, they have spouses and children who are American citizens.

"Secondly and most importantly," she said, "is that the public must wonder out loud what $30 billion to $40 billion of `border security measures' have done for us. It's brought major insecurity, deaths, suffering, separation of families, destruction of private and environmental treasures, political chaos such that we have now elected some of the most anti-immigrant individuals in our history."

Again another misdefinition, Ms. Garcia. An immigrant comes in legally, while the problem is with those that cross the border without permission, as is defined in the laws of the US. And yes, they face death trying to slither through the deserts and destroying private property by robbing out of desperation and destroying our environment by the crap they leave behind on their trek, insecurity because they know they have done wrong, and as for political chaos, there is none when elected officials observe laws already on the books.

"Secondly and most importantly," she said, "is that the public must wonder out loud what $30 billion to $40 billion of `border security measures' have done for us. It's brought major insecurity, deaths, suffering, separation of families, destruction of private and environmental treasures, political chaos such that we have now elected some of the most anti-immigrant individuals in our history."

This woman is an idiot...we now have more Pro Illegal politicians than ever before......

Has she seen the enviromental tresures The desert from the trash these people leave behind...Pleasssse don't go there you can not win this fight with the so called injustices you have brought up.