Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Brian503a's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    California or ground zero of the invasion
    Posts
    16,029

    Commentary: A crackdown on migrants defies logic

    http://www.abqtrib.com

    Commentary: A crackdown on migrants defies logic
    By Laura Carlsen
    March 15, 2006

    Guillermo Martinez was only 20 years old when he was shot in the back at close range by an agent of the U.S. Border Patrol in California.

    Scores of migrants have been shot by U.S. immigration enforcement officers. Mexican human rights organizations warn the number is on the rise. Most fail to make the headlines.

    But Martinez's death comes at the same time as a series of measures to further criminalize migrants, measures that are likely to increase the chances that more young men and women lose their lives on what has become the world's most contradictory border.

    U.S. House Bill 4437, also known as the Sensenbrenner bill after its sponsor, which was passed in the lower house last December, has damaged the binational relationship and stirred both indignation and anti-immigrant fervor. The bill calls for making illegal entry into the United States a felony, building approximately 700 miles of fence to staunch the flow of immigrants and beefing up border security.

    Both the title - "The Border Protection, Anti-Terrorism and Illegal Control Act" - and the logic of the law locate immigration squarely within the purview of the war against terrorism. But using an anti-terrorism lens on immigration issues obscures a much different reality.

    It has been said before. For better or for worse, the U.S. economy depends on immigrant labor. Just weeks after Martinez was shot, Arizona's governor announced the need to import 25,000 legal day workers from the neighboring Mexican state of Sonora to harvest Arizona's winter crops. The same is true of the growing dependence on undocumented labor in the services sector.

    Arizona's emergency measure sought visa-holding workers willing to return over the border after a day's work. But lately talk even of guest worker programs has been drowned out by the rhetoric of hate and fear campaigns against immigrants. Politicians seeking to boost their political careers have offered up anti-immigrant statements that violate the nation's basic principles.

    Until a legal solution is found, employers will continue to rely on undocumented labor or face losing, in the case mentioned above, billions of dollars. This solution forged on the margins of legality causes severe social and personal problems but keeps labor costs down.

    The other half of the reality is the flow of immigrants shows no signs of abating in the near future. Indeed, the number of men, women and children willing to risk crossing continues to grow. Mexico's National Council on Population reports that 2 million Mexicans left during the five years of the Fox administration, most to the United States. Last year alone they pumped $22.2 billion dollars into the sluggish Mexican economy through remittances.

    With Mexico's unemployment at record highs - 1.6 million people unemployed and millions more underemployed - wages below the basic-needs level, millions of youths entering the work force and people left homeless by Hurricane Stan in Chiapas and Guatemala, thousands more will seek a better life or just survival in the north.

    As immigration mounts, so do the deaths. The 2,000 migrants dead of dehydration or acts of violence over the past five years are not the only casualty of our profoundly contradictory border policies. The binational relationship has also suffered.

    Martinez's death led to yet another diplomatic maelstrom between Bush administration officials and Mexico. The Mexican government began an investigation and sent a diplomatic note to the U.S. government. Even those actions were criticized by legislators and citizen groups as a "lukewarm" response amid a climate of growing indignation.

    As violence and drug trafficking on the border threaten to spin out of control, the U.S. focus on hunting migrants undermines cooperation on urgent security issues and diverts needed resources.

    None of this makes any sense. It makes no sense for the United States to treat workers as criminals. It makes no sense for Mexico to consider out-migration an acceptable economic strategy. It makes no sense for one of the world's most commercially open zones to ignore problems of labor flows, shunting them into criminal categories that stigmatize, exploit and deny their very existence.

    No doubt exists that controls are necessary. But the current plans for robot-driven aircraft that patrol the border like birds of prey, multimillion-dollar walls and thousands of armed patrols will only exacerbate what is a political, not a law enforcement, problem.

    Perhaps these measures will reduce the flow of immigrants to the United States. But at what cost? Creating warlike conditions on the border could all too easily become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member WavTek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,431
    Perhaps these measures will reduce the flow of immigrants to the United States. But at what cost? Creating warlike conditions on the border could all too easily become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
    Hasn't she noticed that war-like conditions already exist on the border.
    REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •